Two-way tables, risks, & odds Flashcards

1
Q

visualizing distributions

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

two-way tables

A

a two-way table is a two-dimensional table that displays the frequency counts for two categorical variables simultaneously according to a row variable and a column variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

marginal distribution

A

marginal distribution of one of the categorical variables in a two-way table is the distribution of values of that variable among all individuals in the table

  • the percents for marginal distributions are found by dividing each row total or column total by the table total
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

conditional distributions

A

distribution of one variable depends or is conditional on the other variable

The percents for conditional distributions are found by dividing each row entry or column entry by their total

(class size is conditional on year of study)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

conditional distributions in tables

A

two-way table conditional distribution is the row or column of the table

(frequency of 1st year courses - 1st year column)

(medium class size - medium class size row)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

visualizing conditional distributions

A

variable 1: bald

variable 2: happy

you can select all happy people and take the distribution of baldness

or take all unhappy people and take the distribution of baldness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

defining risk

A

the risk of an event is:

  • proportion of times it happens in a group
  • probability of it happening in a population
  • percentage of the group for which it happens

Risk = Number of occurrences in group / Total size of group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

calculating risk

A

risk of complication = 12/110 = 0.13

risk of complication for A = 10/100 = 0.10

risk of complication for B = 2/10 = 0.2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

relative risk (RR)

A

ratio of risk of an event for two categories or groups of an explanatory variable; a comparison of risk

RR = Risk of event for group A / Risk of event for group B (usually treated as a baseline risk)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

calculating relative risk

A

risk of complications for A = 10/100 = 0.10

risk of complications for B = 2/10 = 0.2

relative risk of complications = risk for B / risk for A = 0.20/0.10 = 2 (x2 more risk)

(usually the baseline risk is lesser than the other risk unless stated otherwise)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

increased risk (IR)

A

percentage change in risk for one group in comparison to another (e.g. baseline) group

Increase in risk = (change in risk / comparison group’s risk) x 100%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

calculating increased risk

A

risk of complications for A = 0.10

risk of complications for B = 0.20

increased risk of procedure B compared to A = (risk B - risk A / risk A) x 100%

= (0.20 - 0.10 / 0.10) x 100%

= 100%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

odds

A

compare the number of units with a quality to the number without the quality, expressed as “to 1”

Odds = Number of occurrences in group / Number of non-occurrences in group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

calculating odds

A

risk of complications for A = 10/100 = 0.10

odds of complications for A = 10/90 = 0.11 (0.11 to 1)

odds of no complications for A = 90/10 = 9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Simpson’s paradox

A

when studying the relationship between two variables, there may exist a lurking variable that creates a reversal in the direction of the relationship when the lurking variable is ignored, as opposed to the direction of the relationship when the lurking variable is considered

lurking variables creates subgroups and failure to take these subgroups into consideration can lead to misleading conclusions regarding the association between the two variables

an association that holds for all of several groups can reverse direction when the data are combined to form a single group - this reversal is called Simpson’s paradox

example: road and helicopter, lurking variable: seriousness of injury

reversal when seriousness variable is observed separately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly