Torts Flashcards
What is plaintiff’s burden of persuasion in a conversion action?
Preponderance
In Virginia, there is an irrebuttable presumption that a child under the age of _______________ is incapable of negligence.
7
Standard of care for a child
that of a reasonable child of similar age, intelligence, and experience.
What standard are children engaged in adult activities held to?
Same as adult
Under the last clear chance doctrine, plaintiff may mitigate the legal consequences of her own contributory negligence if she proves
defendant had the last clear chance to avoid injuring the plaintiff but failed to do so.
Under Virginia law, total damages in medical malpractice actions occurring from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017 may not exceed
2.25 million
For acts of negligence occurring on or after July 1, 2017, the total damages limit will increase by $50,000 each year until it equals
3 million
Conversion elements
1) wrongful exercise of authority over its property,
2) inconsistent w P’s ownership right
In general, conversion only applies to
tangible property, although Va cts have found that an action may lie for unlawful conversion of certain intangible property rights that have been documented
Respondeant superior
Employer is liable for torts committed by employee during scope of employment
In a Negligent entrustment motor vehicle case question is whether
Owner knew or had reason to know that he was entrusting vehicle to an unfit driver likely to cause injury to another
Negligent entrustment intoxicated driver
Whether owner knew or had reason to know that individual was addicted to intoxicants or has habit of drinking
Premises liability: invitee duty
An invitee is a business guest. Owner owes invitee duty to keep premises in reasonably safe condition. An owner w constructive notice of defect breaches its duty to keep premises reasonably safe
Burden for intentional infliction of emotional distress
clear and convincing evidence
Virginia cts define false imprisonment as
an illegal restraint on another’s freedom
Once P demonstrates prima facie case of false imprisonment, it is up to D to show that restraint was
legal or justified
Conversion
wrongful assertion or exercise of the right of ownership over goods or other tangible PP belonging to another in denial of or inconsistent w the owner’s rights
Who can bring an action for conversion?
only person having property interest in and entitled to immediate possession of the item alleged to have been wrongfully converted
Does D have to apply property to his own use for P to recover for conversion?
No, irrespective of D’s good or bad faith, care or knowledge or ignorance w respect to the property
Can conversion relate to intangible property rights?
Yes, such as stocks, certificates, promissory notes, bonds, NIL,
conversion does not apply to claims for
interference w undocumented intangible property rights
Damages for conversion are based on
value of the property converted at time and place of conversion
Burden for conversion
preponderance
Virginia’s good samaritan law
protects ppl rendering emergency care, in good faith without compensation
Good samaritan law protects those rendering emergency obstetrical care from all but
gross negligence when pregnant woman’s medical records are not readily available
Emergency personnel are protected from liability while operating an emergency vehicle en route to an emergency so long as
they comply w warning lights and siren laws
Emergency personnel are not protected if injury results from
gross negligence or wanton misconduct
are those who render emergency aid to animals protected
yes
No duty on employer to supervise employee
Va does not recognize a cause of action based on a duty by an employer to supervise or train an employee
Negligent hiring action is based on whether
employer knew or should have known prospective employee to be dangerous or have a propensity to harm others
Children under 7
irrebuttable presumption that child under 7 is incapable of negligence
Children between 7 and 14
there is a REBUTTABLE presumption that children between 7 and 14 are legally incapable of negligence bc they lack capacity to understand dangers of their acts
7-14 may be rebutted by
evidence that child had capacity to understand the peril and shown that child-P’s conduct amounted to contributory negligence by applying the reasonable child standard to P’s conduct
Common carriers and innkeeper duty
duty to exercise utmost care to protect customers and guests from personal injury
inkeeper duty re criminal conduct
duty to warn and protect guests from reasonably foreseeable injury from criminal conduct of a 3rd party (locks on hotel door)
Trespasser
someone who enters or remains upon the land of another without consent or privilege to do so.
Landowner duty to trespasser
to refrain from willful, wanton, reckless or intentional conduct
Attractive nuisance in VA
attractive nuisance doctrine has been repudiated in VA but landowner may be held liable for leaving an instrument w a hidden danger on an area of his property that is easily accessible to children and known to be frequented by children
Duty owed for Recreational land use
in VA, landowner does not owe a duty of care to persons entering land for specfic recreational purposes, such as hunting and fishing
Landowner is not required to warn such persons of hazardous conditions, regardless of whether landowner gave person permission
Recreational land owner may be liable if
they collect a fee for recreational use or person enters land for other purposes
Recreational Landowner liability for actions of person who enters land and engages in intentional or negligent acts
landowner does not assume responsibility or incur liability for any intentional or negligent acts of recreational user