Fed Civ Pro Flashcards
Venue is proper where
1) any federal district where D resides
2) where substantial events giving rise to claim occurred
Diversity jurisdiction
where all plaintiffs are completely diverse in citizenship from all defendants and the amount in controversy exceeds $75k
An individual citizen is domiciled where they physically reside with the intent to remain indefinitely. A corporation is domiciled where they are incorporated and have their PPB. PPB is where the corp has their nerve center–where high ranking officers and directors conduct the business of the corporation
What jury instruction law should courts use for diversity jurisdiction where it concerns substantive law?
VA model jury instructions
What law does ct use for jury instructions when the instructions concern laws of procedure?
Fed Model jury instruction, so long as it doesnt address state substantive law
Federal Question Jurisdiction
the courts subject matter jurisidction to hear cases that arise under federal law, treaty, statute, or constitution
Supplemental jurisdiction
Fed courts ability to hear a case it would not ordinarily have jurisdiction over when the case arises out of a common nucleus of operative fact as the federal claim before the court
Personal jurisidction in federal ct is determined by
Virginia’s long arm statute + minimum contacts due process analysis
Minimum contacts due process analysis
D purposefully avails himself of VA’s laws thus putting him on reasonable notice of suit
Virginia long arm statute
- transacting any business in Virginia
- Contracting to supply services or things in VA
- Causing tortious injury by act or ommission in VA
- Causing tortious injury in VA by act or ommission outside of VA if he regularly does or solicits business or derives substantial revenue from goods used or consumed or services rendered in VA
- Causing injury in VA by BREACH OF WARRANTY made in sale of goods outside of VA when he might reasonably expect such person to use, consume, or be affected by the goods in VA, provided he regularly does or solicites business, derives substantial revenue from goods used or services rendered in VA
- Possessing real property in VA
- Contratcing to insure person or property located in VA
- Child support
- Operating a computer network located in VA
- Incurring liability for taxes, fines, penalties
- Maintaining a matrominial domicile at time of seperation of parties upon which grounds for divorce or seperate maintenance is based
When/how must D raise challenge of personal jurisidction
motion to dismiss for lack of PJ in first filed challenge to P’s complaint…answer pre answer motion
Submitting to a physical/mental exam
Ct may order a party to submit to a physical or mental exam by suitably licenses examiner when party’s physical/mental condition is in controversy
Motion for leave to ammend pleading should be freely granted when
justice so requires
-aka should not be granted if it would cause undue prejudice, delay or filed in bad faith
What action should be filed when one party holds property subject to competing claims
interpleader action joining all claimaints
Interpleader action asks ct to
determine who is entitled to the property
Interpleader brought in GDC is subject to
$25k cap
D can remove case from State to Fed Ct if
- D files notice of removal w district ct within 30 days of receiving service
2.Fed ct has smj jurisidction
- If diversity, D is not domiciled in jx where case is being removed
- Case is being removed to fed jx where state ct action is pending
Removal is determined based on the pleading at time
D files removal petition
Removal: Diversity must exist
at time of filing pleading and at time of removal
Diversity must exist at time of filing complaint and time of removal unless
P dismisses a party who would have destroyed diversity
Supplemental jx: ENtire case can be removed to fed ct if
state law claim arises out of common nucleus of operative fact as the fed q claim
Ct may determine all issues or in its discretion remand any claims where state law predominates
Can D remove a case from Fed ct to State ct
No, that is called remand and only occurs after removal if removal was defective
If, after removal, P seeks to join a D who would destroy fed court’s diversity, ct may
deny joinder and proceed w the action in federal court or permit the joinder and remand the action back to state ct
How can case be remanded back to state court
if there was a defect in removal
When diversity jx exists when complaint is filed, is jx lost when events after the action has been filed reduce the amount in controversy beflow the stat minim
no, so long as OG claim was made in good faith
Procedure for Removal
D must file notice of removal within 30 days of recipt of the complaint
Notice of removal requisites
removal must be
1) signed containing a short and plain statement abt grounds for removal
2. verified
3) filed in district ct where state action is pending
- accompanied by copies of all process, pleadings and orders served on Ds seeking removal
Must All D’s join in notice of removal?
Yes
Removal: notice to P
notice of removal must be sent to P in state ct where case was pending
Domicile for partnership in diversity
where all partners are domiciled, general and limited
Can you aggregate multiple claims against one D in diversity
yes, regardless of the subject of the aggregated claims
Value of P’s claims against multiple D’s generally cant be aggregated if
claims are separate and distinct
Demand for jury must be made within
14 days of filing complaint
If P has failed to sue a person who is subject to service of process and whose joinder will not deprive the ct of subject matter jx, person must be joined as a party if
1) w/o that person complete relief cannot be granted among existing parties or
2) Person claims an interest relating to subject of the action and is so situated that disposing of action in person’s absense may impair or impede person’s ability to protect that interest or leave an existing party subject to a substantial risk of incurring multiple or inconsistent obligations bc of the interest
what action is used by a D to assert claims against 3rd party for all or part of the liability on the original claim
impleader
Impleaded claim must relate to
the original claim against the defending party
impleaded claim must fall wthin ct’s
SMJ