Torts Flashcards

1
Q

The tort of assault consists of…

A

(1) a voluntary act;
(2) intended to cause either harmful or offensive contact or apprehension of such contact with another person; and
(3) that causes reasonable apprehension of imminent contact with the other operson.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Under the transferred intent doctrine, the intent to commit an intentional tort against one person….

A

can be transferred to the person actually injured or to the tort actually committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The doctrine of transferred intent specifically applies to the torts of ….

A

assault, battery, trespass to land, trespass to chattel and false imprisonment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The mitigation of damages defense can…

A

decrease the damages the Plaintiff is able to recover.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Virginia law recognizes a plaintiff’s duty to mitigate damages in a personal injury action by….

A

submitting to reasonable medical treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The tort of battery consists of:

A

(1) a voluntary act;
(2) inteded to cause either harmful or offensive contact; and
(3) resulting in harmful or offensive contact to the Plaintiff’s person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Can the “contact” in battery be caused indirectly?

A

YES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The elements required to establish a prima facie case of negligence are:

A

(1) a duty on the defendant to conform to a standard of care;

(2) a breach of that duty by the plaintiff;

(3) where the breach is an actual and proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury; and

(4) the plaintiff suffered injury as a result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The proximate cause of an event is that act or omission which…

A

in a natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by an efficient intervening cause, produces the event, and without which that event would not have occurred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A plaintiff must prove proximate cause by showing there was….

A

a connection sufficiently close or reasonably foreseeable that it is fair and just to require the defendant to pay for the wrong done.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The tort of IIED consists of…

A

(1) a voluntary act amounting to extreme and outrageous conduct;

(2) committed intentionally or recklessly by the defendant;

(3) causing emotional distress that was severe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Extreme and outrageous conduct must transcend…

A

all bounds of decency and be utterly intolerable in a civilized society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The distress caused by IIED must be…

A

so severe that no reasonable person could endure it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Does the transferred intent doctrine apply to IIED?

A

NO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Can a mere insult amount to outrageous conduct sufficient for IIED?

A

NO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Typically, a claim for IIED will not stand in Virginia without….

A

physical injury resulting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Is the owner of an automobile vicariously liable for a family member’s negligent operation of an automobile by virtue of the family relationship?

A

NO – Virginia rejects the family purpose doctrine.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

(TRUE/FALSE): Virginia permits claims for direct liability against parents based on negligent entrustment of a vehicle to a child.

A

TRUE

19
Q

For a negligent entrustment of a vehicle claim, the Plaintiff must prove that…

A

the owner of the vehicle knew, or had reason to know, that she was entrusting her vehicle to an unfit driver, likely to cause injury to others.

20
Q

Entrustment may be granted through giving…

A

express or implied permission.

21
Q

In Virginia, children between what ages are presumed to not have the capacity to commit negligence?

A

7 and 14.

22
Q

Can a defendant rebut the presumption that a child between 7 and 14 are incapable of committing negligence?

A

Yes – by showing that the Plaintiff child had the capacity to understand the peril and dangers of their actions.

23
Q

Virginia is a contributory negligence jurisdiction. This means that no plaintiff is entitled to recover for an injury…

A

proximately caused by the Plaintiff.

24
Q

To show that a child plaintiff’s conduct amounted to contributory negligence, the evidence must show that…

A

the Plaintiff’s conduct did not conform to the standard of what a reasonable person of like age, intelligence, and experience would do under the circumstances for his own safety and protection.

25
Q

Assumption of the risk is an affirmative defense in Virginia and it operates to…

A

bar recovery by a Plaintiff based on the subjective inquiry into what the particular plaintiff knows, understands, and appreciates.

26
Q

To succeed with an assumption of the risk defense, the defendant must prove…

A

that the plaintiff fully understood and appreciated a known danger and voluntarily exposed himself to it.

27
Q

A business owner owes an invitee a duty to…

A

keep the premises in a reasonably safe condition.

28
Q

A business owner with constructive notice of a hazard on its floor….

A

breaches its duty to exercise ordinary care in maintaining its property.

29
Q

Constructive notice will be imputed on the business owner if the facts establish that….

A

the business owner should have known of the hazard through its regular inspection/cleaning.

30
Q

If a landowner warns an invitee of a dangerous condition…

A

they have satisfied their duty to maintain the property in a reasonably safe condition.

31
Q

A landowner generally does not have a duty to warn invitees of….

A

open and obvious dangers.

32
Q

To establish a claim of negligence per se, a plaintiff must prove that…

A

(1) the Defendant violated a statute enacted for public safety;

(2) he belongs to the class of persons for whose benefit the statute was enacted, and

(3) that the statuatory violation was a proximate cause of the injury.

33
Q

A claim based on negligence per se is essentially…

A

a strict liability claim.

34
Q

In order to successfully assert a claim for the tort of conversion, one must show that….

A

(1) The Plaintiff has an ownership interest in the property; and

(2) The Defendant interfered with that property interest, depriving the Plaintiff of possession.

35
Q

Conversion claims arise when one shows a…

A

wrongful exercise of authority over property, inconsistent with another’s lawful ownership right.

36
Q

In Virginia, generally, conversion claims only apply to…

A

tangible property.

37
Q

Virginia courts have found that an action may lie for conversion of certain intangible property rights if they have been…

A

documented.

38
Q

Virginia allows for a tort claim for civil conspiracy if…

A

two or more persons conspire to willfully or maliciously injury someone in their reputation, trade, business, or profession; which actually damages them.

39
Q

A corporation, like an individual, cannot on its own….

A

commit conspiracy with itself.

40
Q

The Virginia Supreme Court has held that a pre-injury release of liability for negligence is…

A

void as against public policy.

41
Q

A landowner has no duty to inspect and cut down trees that have the possibility of falling on a public roadway, however, a duty is owed to…

A

refrain from engaging in any act that makes the roadway more dangerous than it was in its state of nature.

42
Q

The Virginia Good Samaritan Statute provides that if one…

A

renders emergency aid, without compensation, to any injured person at the scene of an emergency, shall not be liable for civil damages for acts or omissions resulting from the rendering of such care.

43
Q

Holding someone contributorily negligent for taking actions to rescue someone in distress would be…

A

antiethical to the Good Samaritan statute.