Federal Civil Procedure Flashcards
Federal courts have original subject matter jurisdiction over…
federal question claims that assert federal law as the basis for the claim and relief sought.
Limited Liability companies’ citizenship is determined by
FED.
the citizenship of each member of the LLC.
The supplemental jurisdiction statute allows federal courts that have jurisdiction over a claim to hear another claim if the additional claim…
arises from the same common nucleus of operative facts as the main, jurisdiction-invoking claim.
The removal statutes provide only for…
removing a case filed in state court.
The only way a case can be sent from federal court to state court is if:
(1) the case originated in state court, (2) had been removed to federal court, and (3) was then remanded because of some defect in the removal process.
Under FRCP Rule 12(b)(7), a defending party can move to dismiss for failure to…
join an indispensible party.
If a plaintiff has failed to sue a person who is subject to service of process and whose joinder will not deprive the court of SMJ, that person must be joined as a party if:
FED.
(1) in that person’s absense, the court cannot accord complete relief among existing parties, or
(2) That person claims an interest related to the subject of the action and is so situated that disposing of the action in the person’s absense may impair or impede that person to protect the interest, or leave an existing party subject to substantial risk of incurring multiple or inconcistent obligations because of the interest.
Under FRCP Rule 12, a motion to dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party is/is not waivable.
is not, and can be raised at any time up until and including the trial.
FRCP rule 12 provides that a defending party may, as a third-party plaintiff…
serve a complaint on a non-party who is or may be liable to it for all or part of the claim against it.
In diversity cases and cases in which the federal court has supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims, the Erie doctrine provides that…
federal courts should apply state substantive law.
Federal courts are not required to change their procedure or practices for handling cases and trials so long as they do not …
impinge on state substantive law.
The amount-in-controversy requirement follows the…
FED test
legal cetainty test.
The legal certainty test states that…
FED
a claim will meet the requirements of AiC unless the court can say, to a legal certainty, that the Plaintiff cannot recover more than $75,000, exclusive of interest and cost.
To exercise personal jurisdiction over a Defendant, a Federal District Court sitting in Virginia must….
(1) satisfy a ground under the Virginia long-arm statute; and
(2) not violate due process of law.
The Virginia Long Arm statute provides that…
if a claim in the suit arises from a number of specified activities, then a court in Virginia can exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident Defendant.
A few of the specified activites of Virginia’s long-arm statute are…
(1) transacting buisiness in Virginia;
(2) contracting to supply goods or services;
(3) causing tortious injury; and
(4) using a computer network in Virginia.
Virginia’s ‘transacting business’ activity requres only…
a single transaction of business.
(TRUE/FALSE): A Defendant must come into Virginia to satisfy the enumerated business transaction activity under the LAS.
FALSE.
In addition to satisfying the Virginia LAS, to exercise personal jurisdiction, the Federal Court sitting in Virginia must not…
violate the due process clause.
The minimum contacts test requires that…
the Defendant have sufficient minimum contacts with forum state that the Defendant could reasonably anticipate being sued in the forum.
Purposefully availing oneself of the state puts a Defendant…
on notice of the potential to being sued there.
Under the federal general venue statute, venue is proper in a federal district where…
substantial events or a series of events giving rise to the claim arose, or where the Defendant lives.
Just because there are more bases for a claim to be heard in one venue than another doesn’t determine…
whether a transfer of venue is appropriate.
The determination in transferring venue comes down to whether the district to which the case is being transferred…
FED
would have jurisdiction.
The venue statute provides that the action to be transferred…
FED
could have been properly filed in that jurisdiction.
Where the Plaintiff files suit in a proper forum, the presumption [of transferring venue] favors…
FED
the Plaintiff’s choice of district.
To survive a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, a Complaint must contain…
FED
sufficient facts, if accepted as true, that state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.