Criminal Flashcards
A criminal conspiracy is…
an ageement between two or more persons by concerted action to commit a criminal offense.
A conspiracy is complete when…
the agreement is made, no furter act is required to effect it.
A subsequent withdrawal is no defense to a conspiracy charge if the…
agreement to conspire is already complete.
A co-conspirator may effectively withdraw from a conspiracy if he…
affirmatively informs the other conspirators of his withdrawal from the conspiracy.
By making an effective withdrawal from a conspiracy, a conspirator will…
not be liable for subsequent crimes committed in furtherance of the conspiracy.
Even if one abandons a plan (and reports the conspiracy to the state police), if they do not also tell the co-conspirators about the abandonment of the plan…
they do not escape liability for the subsequent crimes.
Warrantless searches are presumptively…
unreasonable under the 4th Amendment.
Consent to a warrantless search may be given by one…
with actual or apparent authority.
Where multiple parties have common authority over a premises, who is able to give consent for a warrantless search?
any one party with authority, despite the lack of express concurrence by any of the other parties.
In Virginia, in a criminal case, a spouse’s decision to testify…
must be allowed.
Can a spouse be compelled to testify?
No – absent rare circumstances.
Unlike spousal immunity, the marital communications privilege…
is an evidentiary rule. This protects confidential spousal communications made during marraige from being disclosed in legal proceedings.
[must be communications made in private between spouses not intended for others.]
If a spouse voluntarily agrees to testify in a criminal proceeding against their spouse, the criminal spouse may not…
object to the testimony.
Prior convictions are not admissible as impeachment evidence during the guilt phase if….
the Defendant did not testify.
Prior convictions are relevant during…
the sentencing phase of one’s trial.
How does the prosecution admit evidence as to a Defendant’s prior convictions in the sentencing phase of a trial?
The Commonwealth should provide notice of its intention to introduce final orders evidencing a Defendant’s prior criminal history by providing notice to the Defendant at least 14 days prior to trial.
Where should a criminal Defendant direct his appeal?
The Virginia Court of Appeals.
In order to perfect an appeal, a criminal Defendant should…
(1) file a notice of appeal with the Circuit Court within 30 days of entry of his sentencing order;
(2) Transmit notice to the prosecutor of the case;
(3) File a copy of the notice of appeal with the clerk of the Court of Appeals;
(4) Pay the filing fee with the Court of Appeals.
A notice of appeal should contain…
A statement on whether any transcript or statement of facts, testimony, or incidents of trial will be filed; and the appropriate certificate.
If a transcript is to be filed for an appeal, it must be filed with…
the office of the clerk of the trial court no later than 60 days after entry of judgment.
Once a trial record has been received by the Court of Appeals, an appellate will have…
40 days to submit their opening brief.
A violation of the Fourth Amendment, if one occurred, should only result in the suppression of any evidence…
that resulted from the violation.
The U.S. Supreme Court has held that police officers may make an arrest without a warrant if the officers have…
probable cause to believe that the person had committed a crime.
Probable cause exists if the officer has…
knowledge that would warrant a reasonably prudent person to believe that the person has committed or is committing a crime.
If police receive an anonymous tip, they may need…
additional corroboration for probable cause.
The automobile exception allows for…
a warrantless search of an automobile because vehicles are inherently movable and subject to disappearing.
Still must have probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains contraband or another evidence of a crime.
A search of a vehicle is allowable, incident to arrest, in areas…
within reach of the arrestee.
The 5th Amendment protects…
a person’s right not to incriminate onself.
Miranda v. Arizona requires that once a person is placed into custody, that person must be…
informed of his right to remain silent before interrogation is commenced.
The Miranda requirement applies also to statements or other actions by police that are…
designed to elicit a response.
One is likely in police custody if…
They are not free to terminate the questioning and leave at will; or whether, under circumstances, the suspect believes that he is not free to leave at will.
While a Defendant has a right to a trial by jury under the 6th Amendment, he does not have a constitutional right to…
demand a trial by a judge.
(TRUE/FALSE): No constitutional right is violated by the government’s ability to veto the right of a defendant to waive a jury trial.
TRUE.
(TRUE/FALSE): A juvenile has the same rights to waive a jury trial as an adult.
TRUE.
A jury trial may only be waived with the consent of…
the defendant, the Commonwealth, and the court.
If a juvenile is 16 years of age or older and is charged with a felony, what court proceeding should occur first?
The juvenile court should conduct a preliminary hearing.
If a juvenile court finds probable cause in a preliminary hearing, the court will then…
certify the charge to the grand jury.
If a juvenile court finds probable cause for a charge where the Commonwealth wants to try the juvenile as an adult…
the juvenile court loses jurisidction over the charge and any ancillary charges, and the Commonwealth may seek direct indictment.
A direct indictment by the Commonwealth after a juvenile proceeding will…
cure any error or defect in the juvenile court proceeding.
A juvenile proceeding MUST occur before…
the Commonwealth obtains a direct indictment for the juvenile to be charged as an adult.
because the juvenile court has jurisdiction still until the proceeding.
What motion should be filed if a confession has been procured in violation of Miranda rights?
Motion to quash confession
If a person being interrogated clearly indicates his desire to stop talking…
the officers must stop interrogating such person, else they may violate his Miranda rights.
The confrontation clause of the 6th Amendment gaurantees…
the right of cross examination.