Topic 4- Crime, control and prevention Flashcards
Where does the criminal justice system cover
England and Wales
What makes up the CJS
-Police
-Crown prosecution service
-Courts
-Prisons
Who is responsible for the CJS
-Ministry of Justice
-Home office
-Attorney general
Ministry of Justice
-Oversees the magistrates courts, the crown court and legal services
-Manages the justice process from start to end
-Responsible for criminal law and sentencing
The Home Office
-Oversees the police
-Protects the public from terror, crime and anti-social behaviour
-Responsible for crime reduction, policing, security and counter-terrorism
The Attorney General
-Oversees the Crown prosecution service
-Chief legal adviser to the government
-Responsible for ensuring the rule of the law is upheld
What are the key goals for the CJS
-Improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the CJS in bring offences to justice
-Increase public confidence
-Increase victim satisfaction
-Increase the recovery of criminal assets
Role of the CJS
-Deterrence
-Public protection
-Retribution
-Rehabilitation
Restorative justice
Naming, shaming and facing victims
Right realists
Emphasis the individual
-They say that people choose to commit crime because the benefits outweigh the cost of crime
Garland
Now a ‘culture of control’- concerned with controlling, preventing and reducing the risks of people becoming victims of crime
Situational crime prevention
Clarke 1992
-That relies on reducing opportunities for crime
-directed at specific crimes
-involve managing the environment of the crime
-aim to increase effort of committing crime
Target hardening
Aims to make potential targets of crime more difficult and riskier for potential offenders
-E.g. CCTV, locks and car alarms
Rational choice theory
Sees offenders as acting rationally, weighing up the benefits and risks when they see an opportunity for crime
-E.g. Port authority bus terminal, NYC
Port authority bus terminal, NYC
Poorly designed so the toilets were a setting for thefts, rough sleeping and drug taking.
Reshaping the physical layout greatly reduced the crime and deviance
Routine activity theory
Suggests that crime occurs as part of everyday routine when there are 3 conditions present:
Suitable target
No ‘capable guardian’
Potential offender present
Displacement
One criticism of SCP measures is that they don’t reduce crime, simply displace it
Theorist that supports displacement
Chaiken et al
Evaluation of displacement
Strengths
-Reduces certain kinds of crime
Limits
-Most measures lead to displacement
-Focusses on opportunistic petty street crime
-Assumes criminal actions are rational
Environmental crime prevention
James Wilson
-Crime is caused by ‘incivilities’ or anti-social behaviour such as vandalism
Broken window
If a broken window is left unrepaired, this then encourages further acts of deviance
Wilson
Proposed a number of environmental solutions
1.Environmental improvement strategy- Any broken window must be repaired
2.Zero tolerance policing- Police should be proactive tackling things
Left realists
Focus on the organisation of society and the inequality, disadvantage and poverty that can result from this
The Perry pre-school project
-Michigan
-Disadvantaged black children aged 3-4
-Offered 2 years of intellectual enrichment
-By age 40, fewer lifetime arrests for violent crime etc
-For every $ spent $17 were saved on prison costs