Topic 2- Gender patterns, Crimes of the powerful and corporate crime Flashcards
Heidensohn and Silverstri
Gender difference is the most important feature of reported crime
How much of the prison population do women make up
1 in 20
Chivalry thesis
Most criminal agents are socialised to act chivalrously towards women
Pollak
Men are protective towards women
Bias against women
-In 2014 women only made up 25% of judges
-Heidensohn argues that the courts treat females more harshly
Sandra Walklate
Argues that in rape cases it is not
Judge Wild
“Women who say no don’t always mean no”
Explaining female crime
-Functionalist sex role theory
-Patriarchal control theory
-Class and gender deals
-Liberation thesis
Steffensmelier and Schwartz
While female arrests for violence grew from 1/5 to 1/3, 1980-2003
Sharpe
Showed that professionals such as judges, police and probation officers were influenced by media stereotypes of ‘laddetes’
What percentage of males are most likely to be killed by a friend or acquaintance
70%
Why do men commit crime
James Messerschmidt- Masculinity is a social construct
Men have to constantly work at presenting it to others
Criticisms of Messerschmidt
-Is masculinity an explanation of male crime or just a description of male offenders
-Doesn’t explain why all men don’t use crime
-He overlooks the concept of masculinity to explain virtually all male crimes
Winlows study
Study of bouncers in Sunderland- An area of deindustrialisation and unemployment
White collar crime
Edwin Sutherland
-“A crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation”
Occupational crime
By employees for personal gain
Corporate crime
Committed by employees for their organisation
Pearce and Tombs
“Any illegal act of omission that is the result of deliberate decisions”
Types of corporate crime
-Financial crime
-Crimes against consumers
-Crimes against employees
-Crimes against the environment
-State corporate crime
Reasons for The invisibility of corporate crime
1.Limited media coverage
2.Lack of political will
3.The crimes are complex
4.Lack of awareness
5.De-labelling
Evaluation of white collar crime and corporate crime
Strengths
-Contributes to an understanding of social constriction of crime stats
Limits
-Doesn’t explain why not all organisations turn to crime to resolve their problems
Explanations of corporate crime
-Strain theory
-Control theory
-Labelling theory
-Marxist explanations
Evaluation of explanations of corporate crime
-Strain theory and Marxism seem to over-predict the amount of corporate crime
-Capitalist pursuit of profit doesn’t explain crime in a non-profit making state