Top Hat module 2 Flashcards
Mind-body problem
The question of how mental events, such as thoughts, beliefs, and sensations, are related to physical mechanisms taking place in the body.
Dualism
The view that the mind and body consist of fundamentally different kinds of substances or properties. While the body may be made of a physical material, the mind, in this view, was not. Commonly held view, related to idea of soul.
Monism
The view that there is only one kind of basic “substance” in the world, whether exclusively physical or exclusively mental.
Physicalism/materialism
The monist view that all of reality, including mental processes, is physical or material in nature. In this view, cognition is just another physical phenomenon and mental states can ultimately be explained as being based in the processes of the physical brain. Any sense that there is a non-physical mind is an illusion.
Idealism
The monist view that the only kind of reality is mental in nature. In this case, the brain (and all physical reality) is really a mental construct, not the other way around.
Neutral monism
The view that the mental and physical are identical and all of reality is made of this one kind of thing.
Frank Jackson’s thought experiment
A colorblind scientist succeeds in figuring out all of the physiological processes involved in seeing color, including reactive behavior. Does this scientist understand what “red” actually means?
Materialists would say yes: There is nothing left to explain once all the physics and physiology have been accounted for.
Dualists would say no: the scientist may know all of the physical facts, but not the mental components, requiring personally experiencing what it’s like to see yellow .
Cartesian dualism
Descartes proposed that the mind and body formed two different types of substance but that these could interact with one another. Descartes identified the pineal gland, a structure in the center of the brain, as a likely location, a notion that had its origins in the ancient Greeks as well.
Pragmativ monism
Most scientists who study the brain and behavior believe the products of the mind may ultimately be understood in terms of the workings of the physical brain, without appealing to any sort of immaterial properties. The mind and body aren’t seen as identical, but observable behavior can be explained based on physical processes. Our inner consciousness might not be explained by these physical processes. Still, there is the assumption that there are no non-physical mechanisms at work in causing cognition.
Why isn’t everyone who is interested in cognition a neuroscientist?
The brain is enormously complex and our understanding of it remains quite poor (86 billion neurons with 7000 connections each). The brains of different people are very similar to one another at a certain level of description. Thus, it’s necessary to observe the behavior itself to know what the brain does.
Why is understanding the brain itself not enough?
Even if science could one day fully reveal the inner workings of the physical brain, this would have limited utility if these processes were understood in isolation of the contexts in which the brain operates (the body, the environment, the society, the world in itself…). Each one of these contexts is crucial to understanding the intelligent behavior the brain produces and must be studied at their own levels in order to fully consider how cognition comes to be.
Structuralism (Wundt + Titchener)
A school of psychology whose approach relied on introspecting on one’s own conscious mental states in order to understand the mind. It emerged at a time when progress was being made in fields such as physics and chemistry by breaking down complex processes into simpler elements. The structuralists attempted to do the same for the mind.
Introspection
A technique employed by the structuralists to study the mind by training people to examine their own conscious experiences and decribe them in terms of fundamental “elements” of consciousness. Their hope was that they would discover basic principles of how these elements combined to form the contents of the working mind.
Why was introspection short-lived?
- It wasn’t scientifically valid: data that can only be seen by one individual and cannot be objectively verified by others is inherently problematic. Introspection can’t be replicated (because there is no verifiable measure).
- It can only access mental activity that is available to conscious awareness.
Replication
A process in scientific research in which a previous experiment is repeated using the same methods as the original to see if they get the same results.
How is introspection still used in cognitive research?
- The think-aloud protocol: a research method that involves having participants verbally describe their thought process as they’re performing a specified task. These self-reports are often complemented by other measures.
- It can can play an important role in generating theories that are then tested using other methods.
Behaviorism (Watson)
A school of psychology that emphasized using observable stimuli and behaviors as the basis of scientific experimentation. This approach ignores how the subject generates the response from the stimulus and instead treats the intervening processes (ex. brain) as a “black box” whose workings cannot be investigated. Watson based his work on Pavlov’s experiments. Believes in “nurture” rather than “nature”.
Stimulus
Anything used to stimulate the senses as part of an experimental procedure, such as an image or a sound.