TOLAC Flashcards
Describe uterine dehiscence and uterine rupture
- Uterine dehiscence - occult scar separation. Serosa of the uterus is intact → no hemorrhage
-
Uterine rupture - through-and-through disruption of all uterine layers→ potential consequences of nonreassuring fetal status and perinatal mortality along with severe maternal morbidity, hemorrhage, and mortality. HIE.
- Rate depends on previous incision
- Low transverse - 0.5 - 1%
- Classic or T-shaped - 4 - 9%
- Other risk factors:
- # of prior C/S and vaginal deliveries
- Vag delivery protective against rupture regardless of when it was
- More C/S → higher risk (only slightly higher from 1 → 2)
- Interdelivery interval
- < 18-24 month → higher risk
- Uterine closure technique
- single layer closure may be associated with increased risk (but other factors make it hard to tell)
- Induction of labor
- mixed evidence. Cervical ripening prostaglandins appear to increase risk.
- Augmentation of labor
- Pitocin at higher doses increases risk (1.5%)
- # of prior C/S and vaginal deliveries
- Rate depends on previous incision
Describe the use of sonography in screening for these complications
Basically there is no use to it.
No cutoff values have been found so far in using US to measure:
- Thickness of residual myometrium in the LUS
- Width, depth, and length of the hypoechoic interface at the site of the prior cesarean delivery
Measurements may change with GA
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH TRIAL OF LABOR AFTER CESAREAN DELIVERY
- Uterine Rupture and Related Morbidity
- Uterine rupture (0.5-1.0/100)
- Perinatal death and/or encephalopathy (0.5/1000)
- Hysterectomy (0.3/1000)
- Increased Maternal Morbidity With Failed TOLAC
- Transfusion
- Endometritis
- Length of stay
- Other Risks With TOLAC
- Potential risk for perinatal asphyxia with labor (cord prolapse, abruption)
- Potential risk for antepartum stillbirth beyond 39 weeks’ gestation
Risks associated with a planned repeat C/S
- Increased maternal morbidity compared with successful trial of labor
- Increased length of stay and recovery
- Increased risks for abnormal placentation and hemorrhage with successive C/S deliveries
Attributable outcome risk of perinatal mortality or HIE
1 in 2,000 TOLACs
When does most maternal morbidity happen with TOLAC?
When a C/S becomes necessary
(i.e “failed” TOLAC)
You have a patient with hx of C/S in another country with no op report available. Can they attempt TOLAC?
Yes.
VBAC “success” rate
60 - 80%
Depends on the circumstances of the prior C/Ss and hospital policies, etc.
Risk factors for “unsuccessful” VBAC
- Increasing maternal age
- High BMI
- High birth weight
- GA > than 40 weeks at delivery
- Shorter interdelivery interval (< than 19 months)
- PEC
True or false:
Patients with at least a 60–70% likelihood of achieving a VBAC who attempt TOLAC experience the same or less maternal morbidity than patients who have an elective repeat C/S
True
6 steps of shared decision making
- Invite patient to participate
- Present options
- Provide information on benefits and risk
- Assist patient in evaluating options based on their goals and concerns
- Facilitate deliberation and decision making
- Assist with implementation
Recurring vs non-recurring indications for C/S
Recurring:
- arrest of labor
- arrest of decent
- previous uterine surgery
- possibly HSV
- CPD
Non-recurring
- Malposition
- previa
- cord prolapse
- elective
Contraindications to TOLAC
- Previous classical or T-incision
- Extensive transfundal uterine surgery
- Prior uterine rupture
- Medical or obstetric complications that prohibit vaginal birth
- NOTE: suspected macrosomia is NOT a contraindication
Candidates to TOLAC
- One or two previous low transverse C/S’s
- Clinically adequate pelvis
- No other uterine scars or previous rupture
- Physicians immediately available throughout active labor capable of monitoring labor and performing an emergency C/S
Mutualism, or shared, decision-making
Assumes that:
- the provider informs the woman of all relevant information
- the woman informs the provider of her medical history as well as her values, preferences, lifestyle, beliefs, and knowledge
- the provider individualizes his or her approach to consider the needs and value system of the woman
- the provider and the woman interact and engage in a process to arrive at a consensus
- both parties have an equal investment in the decision