To what extent did other nations contribute to Outbreak of War Flashcards
Why do we think of this question?
Because foreign policy is an interaction between different nations - for example the West helped the Nazis by forming the Anglo German Naval Agreement ; drove a gap between the rest of the allies (from Stresa Front)
It was also hard for the west to have formed an alliance with the USSR due to communist regime - what if they had done so? Would Germany have been able to create the Nazi Soviet Pact?
International politics aiding move to war after WW1?
Central and Eastern Europe was highly volatile because borders, rulers and government systems had all changed ; policy of self-determination had created new independent states like Estonia and Lithuania that were economically, politically and militarily weak. Many of them disputed the borders they were given and this threatened to spill into war in 1920s creating an uneasy political atmosphere
What other international influences were there?
League of Nations behaviour and reaction by other countries
Individual ideologies of nations and how they affected other countries
Timeline of Ideological Divides
1) End of WW1 led to setting up Comintern which wanted to spread communism worldwide ; communist party membership grew in west so western governments saw it as a big threat. This resulted in the Western Powers helping fight the Bolsheviks on the side of the whites in the civil,war instead of form alliances - could’ve encircled Germany with alliances on both sides
2) Three countries also became dictatorships , Germany Italy and Japan ; United by anti communism, rejection of democracy, overturning the TOV and dictatorship through military. THIS APPEALED TO WEST TO HELP FIGHT COMMUNISM (PARTLY WHY THEY LED TO APPEASEMENT) BUT AS THEY BECAME MORE POWERFUL AND AGGRESSIVE THEY WERE SEEN AS DANGEROUS
3) USSR now had Stalin who would make a good ally against Germany and who was building up a significant red army
Purpose of League of Nations
Collective security - cooperation between countries that agree to settle their disputes without resorting to war ; economic and military sanctions
Desire for peace after WW1
Ran a series of disarmament conferences to negotiate disarmament too
Weaknesses of League of Nations
Membership
Bureaucracy
Enforcement
Membership - weakness
Not all nations were part of the league therefore it’s validity as a world peace organisation was hindered ; countries that had fought the allies + Russia were not asked to join and the U.S. congress also refused to join despite President Wilson being the driving force
Bureaucracy - weakness
Very weak to make decisions and members seldom agreed to economic sanctions ; it needed agreement if a significant majority to act
Enforcement - weakness
Didn’t have its own army
Made to look weak because they were not decisive in their action
Most nations naturally act in their own self-interest and when it became clear that League couldn’t enforce there was less need to obey a ruling that was not in a country’s self-interest
League of Nations success
Dispute between Germany and Poland over Upper Silesia in 1921
League of Nations failures
Poland taking Vilma by force in 1920
More members that ignored it - weaker it seemed and also meant Nazis did not see it as a force to be reckoned with in foreign policy ; Hitler took Germany out of the league and disarmament conferences in 1933 ; many states did not feel secure to disarm
Example of League being bypassed
Washington Naval Conference of 1921 resulted in the Five Power Pact agreement that limited Naval expansion in Britain, France, Italy, Japan and the USA
Made own alliances and treaties instead of using the league
USSR and League of Nations
Russia not invited to join the league until 1934 when it asks to join because of dictatorial behaviour by Germany and Japan
Allies allowed this and USSR joined but relations never easy with West and smaller states that were suspicious of USSR taking them over
1936 meant Stalin’s purges plus involvement in Spanish Civil War ; both Britain and France tried to negotiate independently to end Stalin’s involvement in war but USSR did not leave and Nazi-Soviet pact put it under even more strain
USSR invaded Finland on 30th October and they were asked to leave on 14th December 1939
How did attitudes of individual countries influence move to war?
Britain France Italy USSR Japan USA
Britain
Attitude to Germany until 1939 was to avoid an alliance but to pursue appeasement in the hope of keeping PEACE - VERY NAIVE - GENUINE DESIRE AMONG PUBLIC AND POLITICIANS FOR PEACE
Faced colonial unrest from India and Egypt ; political and public opinion hardened after Kristallnacht in 1938 and Poland was last straw
Appeasement allowed Germany, Italy and Japan to seize more territory