Introduction to Interpretations Flashcards
What points to keep thinking about?
Functionalist vs Intentionalist
Was it a radical change in direction or continuation of “sonderweg”?
Do other countries bear responsibility for driving WW2?
Dependent on interpretations and discovery of new evidence
View of historians immediately after WW2?
Very much intentionality - Hitler’s expansionist foreign policy took the world to war and he had always intended to go to war in order to build up a German empire
Radical change in direction - almost all of the weight lies with Hitler
What changed these original views?
1961 - AJP Taylor published the Origins of the Second World War which suggested that whole Hitler wanted a German empire ; he did not have a master plan and nor did he necessarily intend to go to war in 1939 ; he had simply reacted to events at home and abroad ; FUNCTIONALIST
Plus Fritz Fischer made connections between first and second world wars suggesting that Nazi Foreign policy was not a change but a continuation of a long-held Germans passion policy (Sonderweg)
Reaction to Taylor and Fischer
Outcry - many said they were excusing Hitler’s actions - I think they are partially excusing him ; no one who killed 6 million Jews etc can really be excused as such ; there were other factors to play yes but unlike in WW1 where there was a catalyst with the assassination of Archduke Frank Ferdinand ; this was simply a clear Lebensraum movement by the fanatic Hitler (movement into Poland) - no excuses…?
Understanding Hitler himself? Why is it so hard?
His speeches and actions varied wildly and he could make a diplomatic deal with the Poles for the polish corridor while telling others there was no option but to go to war over the territory. Inability to make up his mind Cunning diplomacy (different impressions of his aims) Shifting his thinking with variations in political situation (reactionary - functionalist)
Categories of causes for the Second World War?
Economic International Nazi foreign policy Treaty of Versailles Social Other countries’ foreign policy
Economic
World-wide depression of the early 1930s helped the rise of dictators and allowed them to rise to power on the promise of revitalisation (caused resentment in populations)
Nazi Foreign Policy
Expansionism
Racial purity
Social
Expectations of groups within Germany - industrialists, Nazi pressure and ordinary germans
Treaty of Versailles
Fed German resentment (November Criminals etc)
Created an unstable international situation with the creation of new states that argued over their borders
Made other nations more tolerant of German expansionism
Other country’s foreign policy
Chamberlain and French appeasement
Western attitudes to contain communism (Russia)
US/Japanese foreign policy
Italian foreign policy
Russian foreign policy and build up of Red Army
International
USA policy of non-involvement (national self-determination) Dictatorships in Japan and Italy Problems with League of Nations Russia becoming communist Desire for peace from many countries
What if Hitler hasn’t come to power…?
Counterfactual history
Validity of evidence used to formulate different interpretations?
How believable is what politicians say to the public
Is this more or less useful than what they say to other politicians
How can Hitler’s foreign policy be divided?
Intentionalist and functionalist