Theft Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Where and what is theft defined as?

A

Defined under the Theft Act 1968
Dishonestly appropriating property belonging to another, with the intention to permanently deprive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

AR of Theft

A

Appropriation - s.3
of Property - s.4
Belonging to another s.5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Definition of Appropriation

A

Any assumption by a person of the rights of an owner amounts to an appropriation

(assumption of the rights of the owner)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Stolen bike

(appropriation)

A

R v Vinall

Stole a bike but abandoned it nearby

To establish theft, it is essential to demonstrate that the D intended to treat the property as their own, regardless of the owners rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Supermarket tags case

(Appropriation)

A

R v Morris

  • Switched price tags on 2 items in a supermarket and put the lower priced one in his basket

Conviction for theft was upheld as the owners rights to put a a price label on the goods was a right that had been assumed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Consent to appropriation

A

R v Gomez

An act expressly or impliedly authorised by the owner of goods or consented to by her, could amount to an appropriation under the Theft Act 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Definition of Property

A

s.4

“Property” includes money and all other property, real or personal, including things in action and other intangible property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

property - money, personal and real

A

money - coins/notes of any currency
personal - all movable items eg; books, jewellery, clothes
real - land and buildings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Kelly and Lindsay
(property)

A

D’s were both convicted of theft as the essential character and value of the stolen body parts had changed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

case for other intangible property

A

Oxford v Moss

Charged with theft of confidential information after acquiring proof of an exam paper he was due to sit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly