Murder Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define murder’ Lord Coke

A

The unlawful killing of a reasonable creature in being under the King’s peace with malice aforethought express or implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

AR - Unlawful killing & case

A

Can arise from an act or omission

Gibbins & Proctor - omission was criminal as they had a duty to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

AR - reasonable creature in being

A
  • Victim must be a reasonable creature in being at the time of the defendant’s act causing death
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is excluded in being a ‘reasonable creature in being’

A

A foetus is not classed as a human being- AG ref no. 3 of 1994

Life support machines - Does not break chain of causation, V is classified as dead if they are brain dead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

AR - Under the King’s peace & case

A
  • If the killing did not take place during the course of war then it amounts to murder

Adeboajo - guilty of murder as he was not acting during the course of war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why is causation an important part of murder?

A

It must be proven that the D caused V’s death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is meant by factual causation?

A

‘but for’ test - But for D’s actions, would the outcome have still occurred?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

case for factual causation

A

R v White - but for D’s act of poisoning his mother, would she have lived? Not the case as she died due to a heart attack, not the poison itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is meant by legal causation?

A

Was D more than a minimal cause of death or injury?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Case for legal causation

A

R v Pagett - D was the operating and substantial cause of his pregnant girlfriend’s death by using her as a human shield against police officers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Thin skull rule

A
  • V has a religious belief, phobia or pre existing condition that worsens the situation
  • Does not break causation, must take V as you find them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Third party intervention

A

3rd party makes the situation worse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Medical treatment

A

Negligent medical treatment will only make the situation worse where the treatment was so overwhelmingly bad as to be gross, it renders D’s actions insignificant to the final injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Mens rea - express

A

D has direct intent to kill
or
Oblique intent - Death was a virtual certainty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mens rea - Implied

A

Direct intent for GBH

Oblique intent for GBH - Virtually certain outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Case for mens rea

A

Woolin - D threw his baby, did not mean to kill however death was a virtually certain outcome and D was aware of this