Murder Flashcards

1
Q

Define murder’ Lord Coke

A

The unlawful killing of a reasonable creature in being under the King’s peace with malice aforethought express or implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

AR - Unlawful killing & case

A

Can arise from an act or omission

Gibbins & Proctor - omission was criminal as they had a duty to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

AR - reasonable creature in being

A
  • Victim must be a reasonable creature in being at the time of the defendant’s act causing death
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is excluded in being a ‘reasonable creature in being’

A

A foetus is not classed as a human being- AG ref no. 3 of 1994

Life support machines - Does not break chain of causation, V is classified as dead if they are brain dead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

AR - Under the King’s peace & case

A
  • If the killing did not take place during the course of war then it amounts to murder

Adeboajo - guilty of murder as he was not acting during the course of war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why is causation an important part of murder?

A

It must be proven that the D caused V’s death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is meant by factual causation?

A

‘but for’ test - But for D’s actions, would the outcome have still occurred?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

case for factual causation

A

R v White - but for D’s act of poisoning his mother, would she have lived? Not the case as she died due to a heart attack, not the poison itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is meant by legal causation?

A

Was D more than a minimal cause of death or injury?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Case for legal causation

A

R v Pagett - D was the operating and substantial cause of his pregnant girlfriend’s death by using her as a human shield against police officers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Thin skull rule

A

R v Blaue- V has a religious belief, phobia or pre existing condition that worsens the situation

  • Does not break causation, must take V as you find them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Third party intervention

A

3rd party makes the situation worse
R v Padgett - not reasonably forceable that the police would act as a third party, worsening the situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Medical treatment

A

Negligent medical treatment will only make the situation worse where the treatment was so overwhelmingly bad as to be gross, it renders D’s actions insignificant to the final injury
Jordan - must be ‘so palpably wrong’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what two ways can D have intention to kill?

A

Direct - D intends to kill V

Indirect - D does not intend the particular consequences of the act, but death was a virtual certainty and D must have been aware of this
Woolin - threw baby at a wall, death was a virtual certain outcome
Nedrick

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If D does not have intention for murder, what other offence can it be?

A

D has intention to cause grievous bodily harm
Vickers - intention to inflict GBH which results in death is sufficient for the MR of murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly