Involuntary manslaughter - Gross Negligent Manslaughter Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is meant by GNM?

A

When a person dies as a result of another and this is serious enough to make D criminally liable

Can be done by act or omission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Outline the 1st rule of GNM

A

Must be a duty of care, established through existing duties or by novel situations using the tort test in Robinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What duties can exist & cases?

A

Doctors & patients - Adomako (contractual duty to monitor oxygen)

Acceptance of care - Stone & Dobinson (accepted care/failed to fulfil it)

Family relationships - Gibbins & Proctor

Public duty - Dytham (failed his public duty to protect V)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

2nd rule for GNM

A

Breach of Duty
D does something the RM would not do
They are judged against the standards of the RM performing the same role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

3rd element of GNM

A

D must cause the death of V
Goodfellow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Factual causation

A

‘but for’ test R v White

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Legal causation

A

Chesire - was D more than a minimal cause of death? it must be the operating and substantial cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Intervening acts - thin skull rule

A

Must take V as you find them (medical conditions, phobias)

R v Blaue - refusal to have blood transfusion did not break chain of causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Intervening acts - medical treatment

A

Will only break causation where the negligent act is so overwhelming to make the original wound part of history

Jordan - D stabbed V several times. Doctor gave an injection of a substance V was allergic to, resulting in death. D was not to blame as the wound was part of history.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Intervening act - victims own act

A

Victims own act won’t usually break chain of causation unless its unreasonable

Roberts - Reasonably foreseeable that V would jump out of a car after being touched without consent by D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Intervening act - third party intervention

A

makes the situation worse if it was sufficiently independent of D’s act & foreseeable
R v Pagett - not foreseeable that the police would be a third party to break causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

4th element of GNM

A

The jury must decide if the D’s conduct was so bad in the circumstances that it would be grossly negligent & a crime

Adomako - D’s failure to check oxygen tube was so bad in all circumstances as to amount to a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

5th element of GNM

A

Must have been a serious & obvious risk of death at the time of the breach

Broughton - NG of GNM as there was not a S&O risk of death at the time of the breach (nobody had died from the drug before)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly