The Naturalistic Fallacy And G.E. Moore

Question 1

Moore thought that ? good things exist for their own sake and can’t get analysed or broken down, like other things in the ? world. It’s not about proving these things but rather ? them.

Answer 1

Intrinsically.
Physical.
Seeing.

Question 2

Good, according to Moore, is a simple ? thing.

Answer 2

Indefinable.

Question 3

Moore was particularly concerned with ? ?, who argued that goodness can be defined, measured, quantified and ?

Answer 3

Rejecting utilitarians.

Qualified.

Question 4

Moore thought that attempts to define good in terms of something else is the ? ?

Answer 4

Naturalistic fallacy.

Question 5

“Good is good, and that is the end of the ?”.

Answer 5

Matter.

Question 6

Moore says that philosophers who define good as being made up of something else, or based on other things, are making it a ? ?

Answer 6

Complex notion.

Question 7

Moore played importance on ? as the thing that perceives, moral ?, rather than our senses.

Answer 7

Intuition.

Goodness.

Question 8

In the absence of any recourse to some kind of ?, which Moore says we can’t rely on in ? matters, we simply have his word for the existence of these ?

Answer 8

Proof.
Moral.
Intuitions.