Do People Just Know In Themselves What Is Good, Bad, Right And Wrong? Flashcards
When we introduce a system of ?, we begin to discover not everyone shares the same sense of ?
Rights.
Wrongness.
Emotivists, like ? and ?, don’t think moral expressions reflect a kind of knowledge but merely an ? ? to something. The problem with relying on this kind of thinking is that we can have very complex and ? feelings about things.
Ayer.
Stevenson.
Emotional response.
Contradictory.
Philosophers, like ?, think morality involves discerning between different ? ? and working out which is the right one to follow.
Ross.
Moral duties.
Thinkers like Aquinas and Foot, think ? ? come from reasoned reflection on the world. The two problems are that moral judgements can produce ? and people can have strong views on ? that differ from those of others.
Moral utterances.
Feelings.
Morality.
Perhaps moral knowledge is linked to human psychology, emotion, our personal ?, cultures and beliefs, or our spirituality through a link to an ultimate ?, divine force or universal wisdom that connects to people in a way ? ? wouldn’t understand or accept as possible.
Histories.
Power.
Logical positivists.
The ultimate problem with relying on an inner moral ? is that ? is fundamentally something that relates to other people.
Compass.
Morality.
There’s a ? ? to ?, in that morality is about interactions between, and attitudes towards, others, meaning there needs to be a way of agreeing a set of ? we can live by.
Social dimension.
Morality.
Morals.
Experiences and ? that feed our ? are things we feel within ourselves.
Awareness.
Understanding.