A.J. Ayer

Question 1

Ayer thought there were three kinds of judgement: logical (?) judgements, ? (synthetic) judgements and ? judgements.

Answer 1

Analytical.
Factual.
Moral.

Question 2

Emotivism is ethical non-naturalism because it ? the view that ? tell you anything about the external world.

Answer 2

Rejects.

Morals.

Question 3

Only things that can be ? through scientific and mathematic ? are facts.

Answer 3

Verified.

Propositions.

Question 4

Morals are relative only to our feelings or ? Ayer’s thinking is, therefore, part of ?, which holds that there can be no known fixed moral ?

Answer 4

Emotions.
Relativism.
Truths.

Question 5

Factual (synthetic) ? can be verified using our ?, particularly through observation.

Answer 5

Statements.

Senses.

Question 6

Logical statements can be verified ?; they’re true by definition.

Answer 6

Analytically.

Question 7

Moral judgements aren’t ? and they’re not verified by definition. They’re not, therefore, facts about the ?

Answer 7

Observable.

World.

Question 8

Emotivism is sometimes called the “?/?” theory. To say generosity is good is to say “hurrah to generosity”. The phrase “lying is wrong” means “boo to ?”.

Answer 8

Hurrah/Boo.

Lying.

Question 9

Moral arguments are expressions of ? They’re not even viewpoints or expressions of ?, although they’re calculated to arouse feelings and stimulate action.

Answer 9

Feeling.

Beliefs.