H.A. Prichard

Question 1

In his article, Prichard argues that it’s a hopeless ? to try to find arguments to determine what our moral ? are.

Answer 1

Quest.

Obligations.

Question 2

Prichard argues there’s a gap between the good thing and the idea of what things I have a ? about. Duty and the good are separate things. Duty is something beyond the ? thing to do.

Answer 2

Duty.

Good.

Question 3

There are two different kinds of thinking taking place: intuition and ? Reason collects the facts and ? determines which course to ?, what we need to do.

Answer 3

Reasoning.
Intuition.
Follow.

Question 4

Ethical dilemmas are about making a ? between different actions where there are conflicting ? obligations.

Answer 4

Choice.

Moral.

Question 5

Moral obligations aren’t linked to the ? goodness of any action. One simply considers the different ? in the situation at hand.

Answer 5

Intrinsic.

Obligations.

Question 6

Prichard doesn’t explain how we ? between different opinions when different people have different ? about what is right.

Answer 6

Discriminate.

Intuitions.

Question 7

Prichard notes that not all people seem to be able to ? moral ? to the same extent as others.

Answer 7

Intuit.

Truth.

Question 8

Morals differ because some people have more ? around ? ?; they’re more enlightened.

Answer 8

Clarity.

Moral intuitions.

Question 9

Some think Prichard’s most important contribution to meta-ethics is to show the importance of many moral words; not just “?”, but also “?”, “obligation” and “duty”, giving us a more ? range of moral vocabulary.

Answer 9

Good.
Right.
Complex.