The Global War, 1955-1963 -> Cold War rivalries:The arms and space races Flashcards
When were nuclear weapons used?
Only twice:
- In Hiroshima (August 6th 1945) and Nagasaki
- most destructive form of warfare deployed by humans
What were the shortest ways to deliver atomic weapons in the 1950s?
Through the B-52 Stratofortress and the Tu20 ‘Bear’
What are the strengths of the B-52 Stratofortress?
- Can be refuelled mid-air
- long range patrol bombers
What kind of aircraft is the Tu20 ‘Bear’?
A turbo aircraft
What are the benefits of these aircrafts?
Introduced in 1955 and still used today
- can cross whole oceans and continents fast
What impact did the arms race have on the cold war?
It was a major source of instability
What were Eisenhower’s aims for the arms race?
- To get “more bang for the buck” - hoped that an increased reliance upon nuclear weapons would significantly reduce costs
- It was thought that the prospect of “massive retaliation” would deter the Soviets from expansionist activities
- It was also hoped that the possession by the USA of a massive nuclear arsenal would encourage the Soviets to toe the American line
- Coupled with the tactic of brinkmanship - defined by the Secretary of State for War, John Foster Dulles, as “going to the brink of war without being scared”
How did Eisenhower’s approach to the arms race differ from Truman?
- NSC 162/2 -> had a 6:1 advantage of weapons to the Soviets by 1960s
- willing to threaten ‘massive retaliation’ with the Soviets and Chinese
How was the US winning the arms race by the 1960s?
In terms of quantity
- however this was not static
When did the US successfully test a lithium-based H-bomb?
In March 1954
How much more powerful was the H-bomb than the atomic bomb used at Hiroshima?
1500 times more powerful
By when did the USSR have similar technology?
By September 1954 they had similar technology and by 1955 they had tested an airborne H-bomb that was 100 times more powerful than their first attempts
What were the two sides of Soviet foreign policy?
- On one side was summit diplomacy and peaceful coexistence
- on the other side was support for revolutionary regimes, the launch of Sputnik, and stockpiling of weapons
When did the USSR develop itself?
Had an economic increase from 1953-59
- increased by 5.9%
When had the Soviets caught up with the US’ military capabilities?
In 1969, they had reached parity by building more nuclear weapons to keep up
Did the US’ monopoly in the arms race work?
Khrushchev’s crushing of the Hungarian revolution during 1956 was not hindered - but Mao’s sabre-rattling with Taiwan over islands in the Taiwan Straits was
What did the arms race encourage?
- An increased reliance upon nuclear weapons by the USSR
- the arms race not only spiralled out of control, but became ever more costly
What did the arms race give rise to in the US?
Termed by Eisenhower as the ‘military-industrial complex’
- a body, comprised of generals, admirals, lobbyists, intelligence experts and armaments and aerospace manufacturers, which he thought were wrestling control of policy from the hands of elected officials
When did the Soviet economic boom occur?
Between 1954-58
Why did Khrushchev go for the nuclear option?
- To reduce his reliance on costly conventional forces, so that funds could be allocated away from heavy industry, arms production and maintaining the Red Army towards consumer industries
- intended to facilitate the fulfilment of the strategy of ‘peaceful coexistence’
What could ‘peaceful coexistence’ also be known as?
‘Peaceful competition’
What did Khrushchev’s policy represent?
A departure from Stalin’s, but his thinking was still conditioned by the factor which all Soviet leaders had had to countenance - the fact of encirclement by hostile capitalist powers
Was the arms race successful for Khrushchev?
- It did enable sweeping cuts to the Red Army’s budget (e.g. 250,000 officers and NCOs were laid off in 1960-61)
- High-profile projects such as Sputnik delivered the sorts of rocket systems needed to deliver nuclear payloads thousands of miles away
- enhanced Soviet prestige in the developing world
How did Khrushchev’s personality hinder the success of the arms race?
- Khrushchev’s erratic tendency to resort to bluff served only to encourage those hawks in the West who wanted an ever-greater nuclear arsenal (MAD)
- The USSR therefore became locked into an arms race that it could not afford, and which was eventually to contribute to its downfall