the defence of automatism Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

two types of automatism

A
  • insane automatism (insanity)

- non insane automatism (automatism)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

if successful what does the defence of automatism lead to

A

an acquittal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

who is the burden and standard of proof on when d raises defence

A

prosecution

beyond reasonable doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what must d first have for the defence and examples and case

A

d must have no voluntary control over his actions
spasm, reflex action/ not conscious
AG REF NO2 1922

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

authority for spasm, reflex action/ not conscious

A

bratty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

AG REF NO 2 1992

A

C/A held that because he still had some control over the lorry, this did not amount to automatism

partial loss of control insufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what must ds automatic state be caused by

A

an external factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

examples and case for Ds automatic state being caused by an external factor

A

-blow to head
-bees
-sneezing and hypnotism
HILL V BAXTER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

case for effect of a drug being external factor

A

QUICK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

QUICK

A

C/A held his failure to eat meant insulin caused loss of control and this was an external factor
correct defence automatism not insanity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is self induced automatism

A

where d knows his conduct is likely to bring on an automatic state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

when can self induced automatism not be defence

A
  • if d has been reckless in getting into an automatic state: BAILEY
  • where self induced automatic state is caused by voluntary intoxication: MAJEWSKI
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

why is self induced automatism not a defence where it is caused by ds voluntary intoxication

A

d seen as reckless in getting intoxicated so has MR for basic intent offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly