evaluation non fatal offences Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

sentencing structure: for which two offences is the max sentence the same and what is it

A

ABH and GBH- 5 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

sentencing structure: why is it surprising that ABH and GBH have the same max sentence

A

GBH is clearly supposed to be more serious because GBH requires ‘really serious harm’ whilst ABH only requires ‘some’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

sentencing structure: what does ABH and GBH having the same max sentence mean

A

courts cannot give the max sentence for ABH as they will be giving the max sentence for a more serious offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

structure of s.20: what two separate offences does s.20 contain

A

GBH: (really serious harm) DPP v SMITH
WOUNDING: (any breaking of the skin) JCC v EISENHOWER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

structure of s.20: why does s20 containing GBH and wounding make no sense

A

there is no logical connection between the two offences. GBH refers to a degree of harm, whereas wounding refers to a type

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

structure of s.20: why is the offence of wounding not needed

A

a breaking of the skin could be covered by ABH/GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

AR/MR mis-match: what principle do ABH and GBH break

A

the principle that D should have to at least foresee the level of harm caused to be convicted of a serious offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

AR/MR mis-match: how does ABH break the principle that D should have to at least foresee the level of harm caused to be convicted of a serious offence

A

ABH merely requires that D is reckless as to an assault/battery: SAVAGE v PARMENTER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

AR/MR mis-match: how does GBH break the principle that D should have to at least foresee the level of harm caused to be convicted of a serious offence

A

GBH only requires that D is reckless as to ‘some’ harm: MOWATT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what was put forward in 1993 in an attempt to remedy these weaknesses in the current law

A

Law Commission Proposals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what did the LCP advise that s18 would be replaced with and max sentence

A

intentionally causing serious injury- life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what did the LCP advise that s20 would be replaced with and max sentence

A

recklessly causing serious injury- 7 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what did the LCP advise that s47 would be replaced with and max sentence

A

intentionally/recklessly causing injury- 5 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what did the LCP advise that assault and battery would be replaced with and max sentence

A

threatened assault and physical assault- 6 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are the advantages of the law commission proposals (5)

A
  • clear hierarchy
  • archaic terms removed
  • wounding abolished because it is redundant
  • ABH/GBH max sentencing now hierarchical
  • MR of ABH and GBH correspond with AR
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly