evaluation non fatal offences Flashcards
sentencing structure: for which two offences is the max sentence the same and what is it
ABH and GBH- 5 years
sentencing structure: why is it surprising that ABH and GBH have the same max sentence
GBH is clearly supposed to be more serious because GBH requires ‘really serious harm’ whilst ABH only requires ‘some’
sentencing structure: what does ABH and GBH having the same max sentence mean
courts cannot give the max sentence for ABH as they will be giving the max sentence for a more serious offence
structure of s.20: what two separate offences does s.20 contain
GBH: (really serious harm) DPP v SMITH
WOUNDING: (any breaking of the skin) JCC v EISENHOWER
structure of s.20: why does s20 containing GBH and wounding make no sense
there is no logical connection between the two offences. GBH refers to a degree of harm, whereas wounding refers to a type
structure of s.20: why is the offence of wounding not needed
a breaking of the skin could be covered by ABH/GBH
AR/MR mis-match: what principle do ABH and GBH break
the principle that D should have to at least foresee the level of harm caused to be convicted of a serious offence
AR/MR mis-match: how does ABH break the principle that D should have to at least foresee the level of harm caused to be convicted of a serious offence
ABH merely requires that D is reckless as to an assault/battery: SAVAGE v PARMENTER
AR/MR mis-match: how does GBH break the principle that D should have to at least foresee the level of harm caused to be convicted of a serious offence
GBH only requires that D is reckless as to ‘some’ harm: MOWATT
what was put forward in 1993 in an attempt to remedy these weaknesses in the current law
Law Commission Proposals
what did the LCP advise that s18 would be replaced with and max sentence
intentionally causing serious injury- life
what did the LCP advise that s20 would be replaced with and max sentence
recklessly causing serious injury- 7 years
what did the LCP advise that s47 would be replaced with and max sentence
intentionally/recklessly causing injury- 5 years
what did the LCP advise that assault and battery would be replaced with and max sentence
threatened assault and physical assault- 6 months
what are the advantages of the law commission proposals (5)
- clear hierarchy
- archaic terms removed
- wounding abolished because it is redundant
- ABH/GBH max sentencing now hierarchical
- MR of ABH and GBH correspond with AR