The Church Week 3 Flashcards
the ordinances of the church
sacraments and ordinances: general discussion
mustereon = sacrament = mystery =
associated with a mystery; mystery religions at the time - > these celebrations, these grace filled moments at the time
a brief history of the development of baptismal theology and practice
7 sacraments in the Catholic Church 1000-800AD
- baptism - cleaned an adult/infant form original sin - cleaned from sin - baptismal regeneration - grace communicated through the waters of baptism
- confirmation - grace filled moment endowing the person who is confirmed with the power of the Holy Spirit
- uceris - body and blood - presence of Jesus
- penance and reconciliation - sacrifice for one’s sin - remorse for sin
- prayers and alms -engaging in good deeds -
- anointing of the sick - grace for the journey into the after life
- holy orders - ordained for priests of the church
- matrimony - man and woman getting married
**Reformers say only 2 sacraments:
- baptism (Matthew 28)
- Lord’s supper (Matthew 26-29);
*sacraments take plan in accordance with the Word of God and on the basis of faith -> these sacraments are grounded on the Word of God and founded by the Lord
… they said call them ordinances because Jesus ordained them
Augustine defined a sacrament as a
tangible concrete visible sign of invisible yet real grace
the current theological divide between paedobaptism and believer’s baptism
(4)
- immersion - common practice of the early followers of Jesus - after belief
- Tutulian - why would we baptized children who are innocent? - insisting on the validity
- Recipian - baptizing children on the 8th day - circumscion 250 -need to be baptized before then… infants baptized.. then they are released from the sin of adam - if they died they would go to heaven
- infant baptism
the practice of believer’s baptism = hear the good news and embrace it
the mode of baptism: immersion and its evidence
- *the connotation to plunge into water (of the New Testament Greek word βαπτιζω (baptizō))
- *Jesus was baptized by immersion (Matt. 3:16; Mark 1:10)
- *both John the Baptist and Jesus baptized people by immersion (Mark 1:5; John 3:22-23) - plenty of water
- *the baptism of the Ethiopian eunuch was by immersion (Acts 8:38-39)
-concerning the practice of sprinkling people as the proper mode of baptism, the New Testament writers had a word they could have used to signify this practice as the correct manner of administering this rite had they wanted to communicate that idea (rhantizo; Heb 9:13, 19, 21; 10:22); in no account of baptism, however, is this word employed
would of been available to use if true - rhantizo - *the meaning of baptism as set forth in the New Testament also supports immersion as the proper manner of administering this rite
the meaning of baptism: several New Testament meanings
5
- as baptism is in “the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matt. 28:19), this act associates the new Christian with the triune God
- baptism by immersion vividly portrays identification with the major events—the death, burial, and resurrection—of Jesus Christ (Rom. 6:3-5; cf. Gal. 3:26-28)
- another meaning of baptism is cleansing from sin (Acts 22:16; 2:38)
- escape from divine judgment is another meaning of baptism (1 Pet. 3:20-21)
- a final meaning of baptism follows not from any specific passage of the New Testament but from a theological consideration: as one of the two signs of the new covenant (the other being the Lord’s Supper), baptism symbolized incorporation into the new covenant community, the church - new covenant relationship with God
- iniatory right - entering into covenant with God = baptism - immersion proper mode
the necessity of baptism = baptism is not
its non-necessity does not however render it
does not add anything to the accomplishment of our salvation
not to be ignored
necessary for salvation;
unimportant
biblically, this view makes the best sense of several passages of Scripture (1 Cor. 1:13-17) : if Christ did not send Paul to baptize but to preach the gospel, this affirmation would seem
unconscionable if baptism were necessary for salvation
this position of the non-necessity of baptism also makes sense of the discussion of salvation and its means of appropriation
at the council in Jerusalem (Acts 15) - this would of been talked of here if it was nec.
baptism is not necessary for salvation; still, its non-necessity does not render it unimportant; indeed, Martin Luther is a reliable guide on striking the
balance between avoiding the two extremes of insisting on baptism because it is necessary for salvation and minimizing the importance of the rite because it is not necessary
following Luther’s lead, the church, while avoiding the error of insisting that baptism is necessary for salvation, must obey
the Great Commission (Matt. 28:19) by teaching and urging new converts to be baptized (e.g., Acts 2:38) - beautiful baptism
- not a part of salvation - not necc. for it - for appropriating salvation - repentance, faith in Jesus Christ, and baptize people
all Christians are to be baptized because
it is a common part of salvation process
miscellaneous matters for believer’s baptism
age of baptism
if a prerequisite for baptism is a credible profession of faith that flows from hearing and understanding the gospel, then the question of the proper age of baptism is
secondary to the question of what constitutes a credible profession of faith
- children respond but don’t know what they are responding to sometimes
- wired to say yes
- it’s a gospel issue - are we sharing the gospel properly
- once saved always saved..
first issue?
second issue?
gospel issue first… baptism issue secondly
a period of catechism before baptism
in the case of people (other than children) who hear the gospel, repent of their sins, and believe in Jesus Christ for salvation, should a period of time elapse—for catechism, for observing the genuineness of their conversion—before they are baptized?
I advocate for baptism
very soon after a person has embraced the gospel; this position assumes that the new convert has given a credible profession of faith and thus has demonstrated a sufficient genuineness of having grasped onto Christ so as to be saved; it further assumes that biblical teaching on baptism—its importance, meaning, and practice—has been communicated to the new Christian and understood, but this instructional process is not a lengthy one
baptism soon after convserion why?
because the church will never achieve a complete guarantee that a person’s conversion is absolutely genuine, to aim at such assurance—and, correlatively, postpone baptism until such a point is reached—is unrealistic; that level of confidence has not been granted to the church in its earthly pilgrimage
you will baptize unbelievers - because only God knows their heart - we will make mistakes, doesn’t mean we keep putting it off - absolute certainty will never happen
the issue of rebaptism
because this rite is administered by the church—intended here as the universal body of Christ expressed as a local assembly of Christians—I disagree with rebaptism: if a person has heard the gospel, repented of sin, believed in Christ and, upon his credible profession of faith been baptized, that person’s baptism
avails for all time; it may not and cannot be repeated (by way of application, when Christians who have been baptized after a credible profession of faith in another church of the same denomination or in another church of a denomination other than that of the church to which they are making application for membership, they are not rebaptized)
this explanation requires some clarification: believer’s baptism does not consider the baptism of an infant in any church—e.g., the Catholic Church, a Protestant paedobaptist church—to be a baptism; consequently, when Christians who have been baptized as infants express the desire to become members of a church that practices believer’s baptism, they are first to be baptized (this is not a rebaptism, but a baptism)
should only be baptized once
historical views of the Lord’s Supper
the early and medieval periods
- baptism 2. Lord’s supper -always this order; Lord’s supper was celebrated weekly (deacons took the elements and celebrated with shut ins)
Malachi 1:11 - rising of the sun to the setting of the sea -> gentiles now become people of God -> pure sacrifice = Lord’s supper - connection to the blood and body of Christ - associated with the elements of the Lord’s supper
- ideas develop in the early church
- other beliefs..
- remembrance - done in remembrance of him
present= Jesus is present when celebrate it
symbolism = symbols so can’t be reality because symbols - various ideas circulating in the early church - 9th and 10th century: the actual body and actual body of Jesus Christ are present
1215 - fourth latern council of the church proclaimed the Catholic church of transubstantiation - transformed into the blood of christ
Thomas Aquinas - dogma of this
bread and cup of wine are changed (transubstantiation) - it becomes the blood of Christ and the body of Christ - no longer wine or bread but the blood and body of Christ - nature/substance changes - absolutely necceary to believe in transubstantiation
Catholic transubstantiation
denounces transubstantiation; because this is not biblical but only philosophical
in the incarnation, the second person of the Trinity - communication of properties - omnipresent with human Jesus Christ - Jesus is there - Con (in,with,under) substantiation (the elements)… sponge dipped in water; spongy material dipped in water -
Lord’s Supper is a promise - forgiveness of sins - received in faith
Luther consubstantiation (or sacramental union) -
emphasis on remembering Jesus Christ - the elements help stimulate what Christ did for us; against transubstantiation strongly; Jesus can’t be present because he is in the heaven - not and cannot be in his humanity bc he is in heaven
against transubstantiation
against consubstantiation
Zwingli’s memorial view =
= against transubstantiation & consubstantiation; apprecitaed Zwingli’s memorial view;
yes they are signs - The Lord is spiritually present but not physically present; elements sign but not empty sign, spiritual presence of Christ because he is there with us - feeding upon him and celebrating his spiritual presence
Calvin’s spiritual presence view
similar to Zwingli’s memorial view ;
only served to genuine believers - followers and baptized
(Ana)baptist views -
explain the institution by Jesus Christ (Matt. 26:26-29; par. Mark 14:22-25; Luke 22:14-23)
loaf of bread - broke it - take eat this is my body; took a cup - this is my blood - blessed it and gave thanks - this is my blood of the new covenant - celebrating a passover feast - last supper - gave thanks for the wine and bread - eucro - giving of thanks - adding to the passover - remembrance of Jesus’ sacrificial death - sign of the end of the old covenant and the beginning of the new covenant that Jesus made - Jesus wil not eat w us until he comes back
explain the Pauline tradition
1 Corinthians 10:14-22
1 Corinthians 10:14-22 - dont skip over 1 cor 10… flee from idolatry
- one bread, one body - do not be participate of demons - many corinthians were going to pagan temples - celebrating the Lord’s supper and celebrating pagans things not okay - akoinania- fellowship in the body of Jesus Christ - do not particaipte with demons - do not have fellowship with demons - participating when were at the pagan temples
explain the Pauline tradition
1 Corinthians 11:17-34
1 Corinthians 11:17-34 - divisions among you; pot luck… getting drunk and Paul calls them out for eating all of the food and leaving none for the poor; selfish attitude of the rich - in the Corinth church - participating in the Lord’s supper wrongly
my perspective and matters of application
the nature of the Lord’s Supper and its observation
the Lord’s Supper is an ongoing rite, one of two ordinances instituted by Jesus Christ, which the church is to observe between his
first and second comings and in anticipation of his return
this celebration involves symbolic elements—bread that is broken, a cup of wine (or grape juice), and the distribution of both elements to the church: these actions vividly portray the
the broken body of Christ and the poured out blood of Christ—his vicarious sacrifice on behalf of sinners through which they experience the forgiveness of sins—and the church’s appropriation of Christ’s salvific work
the church observes the Lord’s Supper in remembrance of
Jesus’ sacrificial death on the cross of Calvary, and of Jesus’ blood that ratified the church’s new covenant relationship with God
more than mere remembrance, however, this ordinance is a participation in the body and blood of Jesus Christ; that is, as the church celebrates the Lord’s Supper, Christ and all of the salvific benefits associated with his sacrificial death are present
included in this understanding is an ontological claim about
Christ’s presence in observances of the Lord’s Supper, a presence that is neither mysterious nor magical but is grounded on the divine attribute of omnipresence
theologically, divine omnipresence as ontological presence means that
“God is present in the totality of his being at each point of space”
additionally, divine omnipresence as spiritual or moral presence means that
God is present in different ways at different times and places to bless his obedient people and judge those who are against him
applying this discussion, my claim embraces both the ontological presence of Christ in observances of the Lord’s Supper, as well as the particular manifestation of his spiritual or moral presence (1) to bless proper celebrations of the Lord’s Supper and (2) to judge improper celebrations of the ordinance (as exemplified in the Lord’s retribution against the divided Corinthians; 1 Cor 11:29-31)
as Christ promised his spiritual or moral presence to accompany his church as it carries out the
the Great Commission (Matt 28:20) and as it engages in church discipline (Matt 18:20), so too he and all of the salvific benefits associated with his sacrificial death are present in celebrations of the Lord’s Supper
as great blessing for his people who observe the ordinance in a worthy manner, the benefits of Christ’s presence include the following
3
the reenactment of gospel rescue—his broken body, his shed blood—confronts the still-sinful members of the church who eat the bread and drink the cup; thus, an awareness or conviction of sin is relieved through the saving grace of Christ
a uniting with Christ and bonding with fellow Christians takes place through joint participation in the celebration
this nurturing of the gospel and community in turn promotes and furthers sanctification, or maturing in faith and obedience
the church is further benefited as the ordinance both portrays and nurtures the unity of the body of Christ
consequently, the observance of the Lord’s Supper is to be preceded by s
elf-examination to ensure that those who intend to participate do so in a worthy manner (not as worthy people)
regular observation with biblically prescribed elements
in one sense, Paul’s point about “as often” as the church administers the ordinance (1 Cor. 11:36) leaves the matter of frequency to the church’s decision: at one extreme, the church does not have the option of deciding it will never observe this ordinance, because Jesus commanded that the church celebrate the Lord’s Supper in remembrance of him; at the other extreme, the church must repudiate the idea that its members may administer the ordinance privately to themselves everyday
because of what it does—proclaims the gospel message of Christ’s death, fosters
remembrance of Christ’s vicarious sacrifice for the forgiveness of sins, signals the new covenant relationship with God, benefits Christians as they participate in the body and blood of Christ through the presence of Christ and his salvific work, and portrays and stimulates unity in the church—the Lord’s Supper warrants very frequent observation
certainly, the early church’s weekly observance, continued on in many churches today, provides us with a fine historical precedent; according to Witherington, the expectation is “that whenever the whole body comes together, there should be
a Lord’s Supper as part of the act of worship”
= weekly basis
with the expansion of the church into lands outside of the Middle Eastern, Mediterranean, and European areas in which Christianity has traditionally flourished, an impetus to adopt elements other than bread and wine (or grape juice) has called into question the proper means with which to celebrate the Lord’s Supper
however, bread and wine are
the dominically- and biblically-prescribed elements and must therefore be retained in the church’s observation of this ordinance