Test #3 Study Guide Flashcards
Source Misattribution
distortion- memory distortion that occurs when people misremember where he/she encountered the information ex. -false fame effect -sleeper effect -cryptomnesia -source memory
Suggestibility
distortion- the development of biased memories from misleading information
Memory Bias
distortion- the changing of memories over time so that they come consistent with current beliefs/attitudes
Flashbulb Memories
vivid episodic memories for circumstances in which people first learned of a surprising, consequential, or emotionally arousing event (ex. 9/11)
False Fame Effect
?
Sleeper Effect
highly credible sources are initially more influential, but over time the difference diminishes
Cryptomnesia
a type of misattribution that occurs when a person thinks he/she has come up with a new idea, yet has only retrieved a stored idea and failed to attribute the idea to it’s proper source
Source Memory
person shows memory for an event but cannot remember where he/she encountered the information
Loftus “Lost in the Mall” Experiment
- told college kids three true stories and one false one and 5/24 chose wrong event as false memory
- ->memories can be distorted/implanted by false info
- made the false memory seem very memorable
Loftus “Car Crash” Experiment
showed subjects video of car crash, asked different questions (hit vs. smashed) and the harsher word (“smashed”) resulted in a faster estimated speed during the collision
What was Segret’s false memory?
getting kidnapped by gypsies at age 5
What was Segret’s false memory?
getting kidnapped by gypsies at age 5
Eyewitness Testimony: confidence vs. accuracy
having more confidence in an event normally means that the memory is false
extreme confidence = less accuracy
Eyewitness Testimony: reasons for errors
- giving eyewitness lots of time for identification (longer = more uncertainty)
- presenting suspects in a lineup or asking witnesses to pick between options –> not comparing to memory
- cross-ethnic identification
- police officers may reinforce decisions
Eyewitness Testimony: How to Improve
- show one suspect at a time
- ask for quick decision, face recognition should be quick
- don’t ask leading questions
- have presenter blind to condition/situation
- be suspicious of extreme confidence = less accuracy
False Confessions
?
False Confessions
believing you did something because someone else said you did
What is social psychology?
how people think about, influence, and relate to other people
Attribution Theory
how and why people explain events as they do
What are types of attribution?
- Personal/Internal or Dispositional Attribution: refer to things within people, such as abilities, moods, or efforts (ex. hard work)
- Situational/External Attributions: refers to outside events, such as luck, accidents, or the actions of other people (ex.. bad calls by refs)
What are types of attribution?
- Personal/Internal or Dispositional Attribution: refer to things within people, such as abilities, moods, or efforts (ex. hard work)
- Situational/External Attributions: refers to outside events, such as luck, accidents, or the actions of other people (ex.. bad calls by refs)
Fundamental Attribution Error
occurs when we try to explain someone else’s behavior
-consistent tendency to make us look best (overemphasize personality traits and underestimate the situation)
Self-Serving Bias
our failures –> attributed to situational, unstable, or uncontrollable factors in a way that casts us in positive light
our successes –> attributed to personal, permanent factors in a way that gives us credit for doing well
Zimbardo Prison Study
groups of people brought in to role play guards and prisoners (no initial difference)
-guards became harsh with prisoners as they filled their role
Power of the Situation
?
Conformity
altering one’s behaviors/opinions to match those of other people or the match other people’s expectations
Asch Conformity Experiment
“visual perception study”
- everyone sits around table, only one real participant
- shown a standard line and must pick out one that is most similar –> all subjects choose “1” (when it is actually “2”) and most participants will choose “1” as well to conform to the group consensus
- bigger group –> more conformity
Conditions that strengthen conformity
- social norms: expected standards of conduct
- larger group side
- group unanimity
Conditions that strengthen conformity
- social norms: expected standards of conduct
- larger group side
- group unanimity
Reasons for conforming
- Normative Influence: occurs when we go along with the crowd to avoid looking foolish
- Informative Influence: occurs when we assume that the behavior of the crown represents the correct way to respond
Reasons for conforming
- Normative Influence: occurs when we go along with the crowd to avoid looking foolish
- Informative Influence: occurs when we assume that the behavior of the crown represents the correct way to respond
Compliance
agreeing to a request made by others
Foot-In-The-Door effect
ask for something small, gradually work up to asking for something large
Door-In-The-Face effect
ask for something outrageous, come back with counter request that you actually wanted to begin with (now seems more “reasonable”)
Obedience
following orders of an authority figure
Milgram Experiment
-interested in knowing why people obey orders, even to harm people
-read words to learner - wrong recitation? = shock with increasing voltage
RESULTS: 65% of subjects gave fatal shocks because experimenter tole them to, subjects said it was traumatic, but know to be more cautious now
When are we less likely to be obedient?
- when learner is in same room
- when experimenter is out of room = less authority
- less prestigious setting
- watch someone else say no
- teacher gets to choose shock level
When are we less likely to be obedient?
- when learner is in same room
- when experimenter is out of room = less authority
- less prestigious setting
- watch someone else say no
- teacher gets to choose shock level
Social Loafing
people work less hard when in a group than when alone
-can be prevented by monitoring individuals efforts in group
Social Facilitation
tendency for people to perform better on simple tasks when in the presence of other
Social Facilitation
tendency for people to perform better on simple tasks when in the presence of other
What is Zajoncs Model?
presence of others can enhance/impair performance
- enhance if dominant response is relatively easy
- impair if dominant response is difficult
What is Zajoncs Model?
presence of others can enhance/impair performance
- enhance if dominant response is relatively easy
- impair if dominant response is difficult
Deindividualization
removing individual identity, a state of reduced individuality, reduced self-awareness, and reduced attention to personal standards
Risky-Shift Effect
decisions made by a group tend to be more risky than ones made by individuals
Group polarization
- group position starts neutral
- initial attitude of one or few members determine if the group position becomes riskier or more cautious
Groupthink
an extreme form of group polarization, results when group members are afraid to dissent, concerned about maintaining the group’s cohesiveness
Attitudes
people’s evaluations of objects, events, or ideas
Implicit vs. Explicit Attitudes
Implicit: attitudes that influence a person’s feelings/behavior at an innocuous level
Explicit: attitudes a person can report
Cognitive Dissonance
an uncomfortable mental state due to a contradiction between two attitudes or between an attitude and a behavior (ex. value your health, but still smoke)
How to stop dissonance
- change behavior (ex. quit smoking)
- change attitude (ex. “smoking’s not so bad for me”)
- trivialize the discrepancies (ex. “I don’t smoke that much”)
- rationalize away the conflict (ex. “I won’t get sick”)
Festinger Experiment
- Cognitive Dissonance
- participants did a boring task, were to tell others how enjoyable it was
- some paid $20, some paid $1 to lie about enjoyment
- ->results: $1 group said it was more interesting than $20 group, they changed their attitude
Post-Decisional Dissonance
automatic process, focus on positive aspects of chosen option and the negative aspects of the non-chosen option, avoids having regret (ex. new car over old car)
Insufficient Justification
way to change attitudes by changing behaviors first, using as few incentives as possible
By-stander Effect
failure to offer help by those who observe someone in need
“Good Samaritan” Study
-seminary student asked to talk about the “Good Samaritan” story, told they were late, ran, didn’t NOTICE man in need of help on their way, ran by then because they were too focused on their task