Test 2 (Ch. 5-7) Flashcards

1
Q

barnum effect

A

tell anybody something generic enough about them and they’ll think you’re psychic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

social cognition

A

the intersection of social and cognitive components… investigating how people think about others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

cognitive miser

A

humans are lazy and will conserve resources whenever possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

information overload

A

demands for cognitive capacity is greater than the actual capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

sacrificer (info overload)

A

conserve resources, more likely to be wrong, happier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

maximizer (info overload)

A

think about every aspect of a decision before making it, less happy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

knowledge structures

A

organized packets of information stored in cognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

violations of expectations

A

when something goes against your schema

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

kelly, schemas, cold lecture

A

gave same lecture, but people were lead to believe the lecturer was hot or cold. people rated them as hot or cold based on the original statement, despite getting the same exact lecture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

script

A

expectation on how an event should go

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

priming

A

what happens when you trigger a stereotype (Ex; ‘old’ words made people walk slow, ‘young’ words made people walk fast)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bargh/Chen/Burrows (rude vs. polite)

A

primed with rude, polite, and neutral worlds, measure % of participants who then interrupted the researcher, 63% of the rude ones did, less neutrals, and almost no polites

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

framing

A

the way you’re presented info makes you process it differently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

gain-framed

A

positive framing of a situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

loss-framing

A

negative framing of a situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

thought suppression

A

purposefully try to not think about a thing. it’s unsuccessful and will become the only thing you think about, conscious thoughts trigger the automatic system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

stroop effect (colored words)

A

colored words, people have difficulty not reading word instead of color (deliberate vs. automatic process)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

automatic vs. deliberate thinking (all igloos can eat eggs)

A

Awareness
Intention
Control
Effort
Efficiency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

counterregulation, aka ‘what the heck’

A

you already messed up, so what the heck–let’s mess up some more!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

fundamental attribution error

A

other’s behavior is due to their internal causes, downplay situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

actor/observer bias

A

actors make external attributions, and observers make internal attributions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

weiner, attribution dichotomies (i/eu/s)

A

internal/external
unstable/stable
is: ability
es: task difficulty
iu: effort
eu: luck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

heuristics

A

mental shortcuts about likelihood of uncertain events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

representativeness heuristic

A

judge frequency of an event by the extent to which it resembles the typical case (matching)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
availability heuristic
judge frequency of an event by how easily relevant instances come to mind
26
simulation heuristic
judge frequency of an event by the ease you can imagine it (counterfactual thinking)
27
anchoring and adjustment heuristic
judge frequency of an event by using a starting point (anchor) and *adjusting* up or down
28
confirmation bias
we search for info that confirms our beliefs and disregard contrary info
29
illusory correlation
overestimate link between variables that are related only slightly or not at all
30
one-shot
after one exposure to a weird thing, you assume all things like it are linked: ex; a mormon with a pet koala
31
base rate fallacy
ignore/underuse info about most people and instead are influenced by distinctive features of the current case
32
gambler's fallacy
believe a particular chance event is affected by previous events
33
hot hand
lucky gamblers think they have a 'hot' hand and that their luck will continue
34
false consensus
overestimate # of other people who share your beliefs or ideas
35
false uniqueness effect
underestimate # of people who stare our most prized traits and abilities
36
theory/belief perseverance
when you draw a conclusion, you con't change unless the evidence is crazy overwhelming
37
regression to the mean
extremes are followed by averages
38
illusion of control
false belief that you can influence uncertain events, especially random or chance ones
39
counterfactual thinking (up/down)
imagine alternatives to past/present events or circumstances--if we changed ONE THING, it would be so different (upward, downward)
40
first instinct fallacy
better not to change initial answer even if another seems correct
41
upward.downward counterfactual
imagine alternatives that are better or worse than actuality, regret
42
debiasing
reducing errors/biases by using deliberate processes instead of automatic ones
43
meta-cognition
thinking about your thinking
44
prototype
the ideal average
45
cause to effect
expect the cause to be the same magnitude as the effect
46
schwarz et. al (assertiveness)
think of 6 or 12 times you were assertive, then rate how assertive you are. 6 said they were more assertive bc it was easier to recall 6 events than 12
47
chou/edge (facebook)
had people rate happiness level of friends' lives, asked how much time they spent on facebook. the more time they spent on facebook, the happier they perceived their friends to be
48
ehglich judges
make a sentencing decision after reading a file with a low or high anchor (5 vs. 30), those exposed to a harsher sentence decided on a harsher sentence whether the info came from a reporter or a lawyer
49
covariation model (kelley) (cdc)
1. consensus (do others act in the same way as we do) 2. distinctiveness (does this person act. the same in other situations) 3. consistency (does this person act the same way in this situation across several instances)
50
actions vs. intentions
judge others by actions, ourselves by intentions
51
conformity vs. individuality
assume others are sheep
52
optimistic bias
we think things will go good for us rather than bad
53
overconfidence bias
we are overly trustworthy of ourselves
54
negative bias
we focus on negative information when it's presented to use
55
illusory correlation
assume two things will happen together without any real link
56
alternative outcomes effect
past experience has influence on future random events
57
self-fulfilling prophecy
we act in ways to fulfill our expectations
58
daryl and gross (dumb kid)
gave packer of info on child applying to a fancy school, were lead to believe child is smarter or dumber, watched the kid take a test and those lead to believe the kid was smart thought they were smarter/had a higher test score and vice versa
59
bodenhausen (off times)
more likely to fall for errors and biases in our off times
60
emotion
a response to some sort of external stimuli, reaction
61
mood
a state not connected to any external stimuli, lasts longer
62
affect
good/bad, reflexitive reaction that is either positive or negative, reaction
63
emodiversity
degree wo which you experience different types of emotions, Ex; always happy people score low
64
stimulus (ES) arousal (PA) appraisal (CA)
triggers an emotion how it physically feels what you think
65
james-lange theory and facial feedback hypothesis
ES --> PA --> CA --> emotion ffh = skips ES and tricks you with PA, but assumes each emotion has a specific PA
66
schacter-singer theory (schacter two-factor)
PA --> ES --> CA --> emotion Ex; my heart beats fast. i look around and see a snake. i feel fear! doesn't have to be accurate
67
negative emotions are stronger than positive ones
last longer, more intense, matter to us more
68
excitation transfer
put physiological arousal onto a stimulus that did not cause it
69
duttor and aron (bridges)
70s, all college men, asked to cross bridges. one was scary and one was normal. at the end a hot assistant gave her number if they wanted results. those on the scary bridge called her for a date, fear = lust
70
yerkes-dodson law
dependent on the task at hand medium arousal is generally the best for performance
71
basic emotions
happiness, anger, disgust
72
abel and kruger (baseball smiles)
smiling baseball cards lived around 7 years longer than those who didn't smile
73
negative approach emotion
anger, a negative emotion that wants you to approach the stimulus instead of avoiding it
74
anger superiority effect
quicker to ID anger than any other emotion, and slower to look away from it
75
conceal/catharsis
hiding your anger (doesn't last long) or taking it out on a different, safer stimulus (makes you angrier for longer)
76
negative avoidance emotion
negative emotion that wants you to avoid the stimulus instead of spproaching it
77
disgust
strongest physiological arousal, women are disgusted more than men (shocker)
78
ekman/universal emotions
six emotions are well-recognized by all; happy, sad, angry, disgust, fear, surprise, appear by 8 months
79
matsumoto and willingham (blind athletes)
compared born-blind and sighted athletes. blind ones has similar expressions to sighted during emotions in the six specific
80
display norms
cultural rules on how and to whom you display emotion
81
larson and pleck (emotional beeper)
gender differences; gave a beeper, when it went off you reported your emotional state. no significant difference was found
82
self-conscious emotions
critical in motivation and regulation, emerge later in development, don't have specific facial expressions
83
social conparison emotions
envy, jealousy
84
envy (benign/malicious)
you want something, requires 2 people benign: we want what they have and work to get it, self focused malicious: we want what they have and will destroy what or who has it, other focused
85
jealously
a threat in a relationship, minimum 3 people gender difference: women are more jealous of emotional threats, while men are more jealous of physical or sexual threats
86
self-evaluative emotions
evaluating yourself as you think others would evaluate you; empathy, guilt/shame, survivor's guilt, 'out damned spot', embarrassment, pride/hubris
87
empathy
guilt increases and shame decreases
88
guilt vs. shame
guilt is about an action, while shame is about who you are as a person
89
survivor's guilt
feel guilty with no way to make it up, lasts for a long time
90
mcmillen and austin (lies and volunteering)
waiting area with confederate who tells all OR says nothing. then asked if they know anything about the experiment, everyone says no, they don't. those who really did know volunteered after for an hour longer, guilt drives us to do good and absolve ourselves
91
'out damned spot'
cleaning is associated with an absolvement of guilt
92
embarrassment
unique, has a facial example (blush), occurs when you've violated a social norm APOLOGIZE and REPAIR the norm trivial violations
93
pride/hubris
about an ACCOMPLISHMENT, not a VIOLATION pride: ACT; good grades on a test hubris: PERSON; i'm a narcissist
94
purposes
group formation, group control, shared information, behavioral, guide cognition, guide decision, cushion us
95
kramer (+/- facebook)
altered facebook feed to be more + or -m people shared info that fit with the feed (+ to + and - to -)
96
affective forecasting
try to predict our resulting behavior or emotion based on a decision, and we are ass at it
97
beliefs
your thoughts/opinions about something, SEPARATE from understanding (opinion)
98
attitudes
global evaluations of something (i like this because this)
99
dual attitudes
having two attitudes about the same thing, Ex; automatic and deliberate attitudes
100
mere exposure effect
we like things we are routinely exposed to
101
classical conditioning
unconditioned stim = pig food unconditioned response = drool neutral stim = pig bell (pavlov)
102
operant conditioning
we repeat rewarded behaviors and stop punished behaviors (bf skinner)
103
social learning
we learn by mimicking others, Ex; bobo doll and bandura
104
attitude polarization
people's attitudes get more extreme when they reflect on them
105
effort justification
when people work hard, they convince themselves that it's worthwhile
106
post-decision dissonance
cog. diss. after making a hard choice, tend to increase the goodness of our choice and decrease the goodness of the other
107
selective exposure
people seek info that supports their preexisting views and avoid what contradicts it
108
filter bubbles
algorithm that show you what you want on insta, etc.
109
a-b problem
inconsistency between attitudes and behaviors (general attitudes vs. specific behaviors)
110
behavioral intentions
plan to perform the behavior in question
111
subjective norms
perceptions about if others do or don't think you should perform the behavior in question
112
perceived behavior control
believing if you can actually perform the behavior in question
113
coping
people try to deal with traumas and return to normal life
114
assumptive worlds
people believe these things about reality: 1. the world is benevolent 2. the world is fair and just 3. i am a good person
115
cognitive coping
beliefs play a central role in helping people cope with and recover from misfortune (downward and upward comparisons)
116
emotional intelligence
ability to percieve, generate, understand and regulate emotions
117
affect blends
emotion we feel is a mix of different facial expressions making it harder to perceive
118
facilitating thoughts
how we process our own emotional thoughts and incorporate them in our emotional cognition
119
mood congruence
we pay attention to information that matches our mood
120
tate dependent retrieval
easier to retrieve information when your emotion matches emotion you had when encoding
121
mood and attributions
mood matches attributions (ex; good mood = person is speeding bc of an emergency, not bc they're an asshole)
122
affect regulation
managing emotions (get into, out of, prolong) positive: do good feeling things, reach out for social support, exercise negative: rumination, distraction, consumption
123
explicit vs. implicit
explicit: deliberate, recent experiences implicit: automatic, childhood experiences
124
staats and staats (swedish)
paired random norwegian/swedish words with positive/negative words. those with positive words had a higher opinion of the country
125
instrumental learning
rewards and punishments are abstract (ex; you share a similar political view as your family and they give you more hugs or attention)
126
what affects the strength of an attitude?
embeddedness (embedded attitudes affect several aspects of your life) commitment (how sure you are that it's right) age (older people have stronger attitudes)
127
lord/ross/lepper (polarization)
death penalty pro/con, told to read articles that both supported and denied their beliefs, the beliefs were still stronger. when only exposed to opposite argument, attitudes were still stronger.
128
theory of planned behavior (intention predicts behavior)
attitude+subjective norms+control over your behavior = intention to act = behavior
129
spontaneous behavior
attitude = behavior
130
attitude follows behavior principle
we make attitudes based on behaviors we engaged in (and create self knowledge by looking at our own behavior)
131
lapiere (cars, chinese)
traveled us with a chinese couple, were served at 249/250 establishments. when sending a survey, 230 said they wouldn't accommodate. can't tell if the person responding was the one they were interacting with
132
howerton, meltzer, olson (lapiere)
did with gay couple, still a big disconnect
133
accessibility
behavior varies based on the attitude you're in (ex; if you're at work, you need good customer service)
134
principle of aggregation
stronger predictive of attitude if you look across several instances
135
festinger ($)
1/20 dollar lie, those who got one dollar actually changed their minds and said it was a good, not a boring experiment (turning pegs and lying to a confederate about how interesting it was)
136
counterattitudinal action
behavior in opposition to your attitude
137
cognitive dissonance ingredients (4)
1. negative consequences 2. personal responsibility for consequence 3. physiological arousal/response 4. response must be attributed to their actions
138
salience of inconsistency
if you don't know you're being inconsistent, you won't feel cognitive dissonance