Test 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Behavior needs to be

A

observable, reliably recorded, quantifiable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why do you need measures of behavior?

A

provide best evidence that an intervention designed to change behavior is or is not working

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

To be useful in addressing human problems your measurement systems need to…

A
  • measure the real problem
  • be reliable
  • be sensitive to the amount of change
  • be practical
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Goals in Applied Behavior Analysis

A
  • Make things better
  • Create solutions that are replicable
  • Develop a better basic understanding of human behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mechanical/electrical recording

A

Advantages: easy to use, highly reliable, constant recording possible
Disadvantages: expensive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Self-reports

A

Advantages: easy, inexpensive, no intrusion on privacy
Disadvantages: not always believable unless there is another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Direct observation by observers

A

Advantages: maximize likelihood of recording behavior you want to measure
Disadvantages: person time and intrusion on privacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Direct observation by observers is most common. To use it you need (3 things)

A
  • definition of behavior
  • method of recording the amount of behavior
  • evaluation of the reliability of recording
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Frequency measure

A

count number of times behavior occurs during an observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Duration measure

A

record how much time behavior occurs during an observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Interval-by-interval measure

A

divide observation period into small time blocks and score whether or not behavior occurs in each of the time blocks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Time sampling

A

observe frequently for brief moments during an observation and score whether behavior occurred or not during each moment you observed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When would you use frequency count or duration measure of a behavior?

A

Frequency- hitting (number)

Duration- sleep (amount)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why would you use interval-by-interval?

A

gives you an overall estimate of amount of behavior; shows agreement b/t 2 observers more precisely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why would you use time sample recording?

A
  • gives estimate of amount and shows agreement b/t 2 observers
  • BUT need a very large number of time samples to get accurate amount of behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Difference b/t interval-by-interval and time sampling?

A

Interval-by-interval observe for a longer time period.

17
Q

How do you calculate the reliability between observers?

A

Larger total divided by smaller total multiplied by 100 to get percentage of agreement.
13/15= .87x100= 87%

18
Q

What is the typical interval size in interval-by-interval recording?

A

10,20, or 30 seconds

19
Q

What is a problem with comparing totals of 2 observers?

A

You don’t know whether or not the observers are recording the same events at the same time.

20
Q

What is the first question you want to answer about your intervention?

A

Does it work? Does it change behavior in a desirable direction?

21
Q

To answer the first question of intervention you need (2 things)

A
  • way of determining that the behavior you are measuring has changed in desirable direction
  • adequate experimental design to rule out extraneous variables
22
Q

Experimental-control group designs

A

intervention or no intervention at the same time with different people who are randomly assigned to groups

23
Q

Experimental-comparison group designs

A

intervention or no intervention at the same time with different people who are selected to be comparable to the people in the experimental group

24
Q

Reversal designs (ABAB)

A

intervention or no intervention with the same person at different times

25
Q

Multiple-baseline designs

A

intervention or no intervention at different times with the different people or in different situations or for different behaviors

26
Q

Changing-criterion designs

A

systematic manipulation of behavioral requirements with a person to see if behavior matches the requirements

27
Q

Alternating-treatment designs

A

alternating several treatments multiple times with a person for a single behavior

28
Q

Reversal design steps

A
  1. baseline
  2. intervention on baseline
  3. maintain intervention until change
  4. return to baseline (remove intervention) until goes back to baseline
  5. reinstate intervention until behavior is acceptable or can’t improve further
29
Q

Changing-criterion design steps

A
  1. take baseline until behavior shows no trend or moving opposite than expected
  2. intervention with criterion for reinforcement slightly higher than baseline
  3. interventions increase criterion for reinforcement
30
Q

Alternating-treatment design steps

A
  1. take baseline on 2 tasks until both show no trend or going opposite than expected
  2. start intervention and alternate
31
Q

Second question of intervention

A

Does the intervention work enough? (consumer satisfaction/normative measures)

32
Q

Third question of intervention

A

What parts of the intervention contribute to the effectiveness of the intervention?

33
Q

How do we evaluate consumer satisfaction?

A

rating scales (1 to 5)

34
Q

What are normative measures?

A

How do the outcomes of the intervention compare to “normal” amounts of the behavior?

35
Q

Evaluations of components of intervention

A

cost, difficulty of implementation, undesirability of some components