TASK 9 - MILITARY AND POLICE FORCE Flashcards
- 2 distinctions within security. where?
- maintenance of security in domestic sphere
- maintenance of security in international sphere
1.1 maintenance of security in domestic sphere
- state’s capacity to mantain order within its borders
- instruments include: coercive state, police, military
- deals with relationship btw state and non-state actors
- sovereign power of state
stands above all associations and groups
possess a monopoly of the means ‘legitimate violence’
1.2 maintenance of security in international sphere
- state’s capacity to provide protection against threats from beyond its own borders
- instruments: armed forces, resistance of military attacks
- deals w relationship of state w other states
- problematic!
international politics conducted in environment being ANARCHICAL
lacks enforceable rules or pre-eminent power
- DOMESTIC SECURITY. police and politics: main purpose and diffs with military
-> main: maintain domestic order
- disciplined
- uniformed
- armed bodies
-> diffs
- has routine everyday
- closely integrated in society
- use non-military tactics: rely on consent and legitimacy (often unarmed, only self-defense)
- APPROACHES TO POLICING (3)
- liberal perspective
- conservative perspective
- radical perspective
3.1 liberal perspective
- essentially neutral body
- function: maintain domestic order through protection of ind rights and liberties
- operate w consensus
- high measure of legitimacy
- promotes social stability
- personal security
- no political function
- uphold the rule of law
- protect citizens from each other
3.2 conservative perspective
- role: preserve authority of the state
- ensure that jurisdiction extends through community
- rooted in pessimistic view of hum nature
- seen as mechanisms of pol control
3.3 radical perspective
- critical view
- core: tools of oppression acting in the interest of the state not the people
- serve elites not masses
- marxist version: seen as defenders of property and upholders of capitalist class interests
- ROLE OF THE POLICE (4 types)
- civil policing
- community policing
- firebrigade policing
- zero-tolerance policing
4.1 civil policing
- aspect of work with which we are most familiarized
- fight crime
- international character
- homogeneous communities: significant level of self-policing
4.2 community policing
ex: japan
- expected to know and visit various families that fall within that area of jurisdiction
- success depends on police being respected in the local community
4.3 fire brigade policing
- emph capacity of police to react to breaches of law
- adoption of harder policing tactics
- technology and arms
4.4 zero-tolerance policing
- relies on strict enforcement in relation to minor offences
- to significantly reduce crime
- unrestrained petty crime impression of ‘no one is in control’
- HOW IS THE POLICE POLITICAL. (2)
- may be carried out in accordance w pol biases or social prejudices
- favoring certain groups
- traditional for radicals and socialists
- tends to breed a culture being authoritarian and pol conservative - may exert beyong civil matters and impact on pol disputes
LEVEL HAS INCREASED AS SOCIETIES HAVE BECOME MORE COMPLEX AND FRAGMENTED
- some argue that all crime is ‘political’
- neutrality compromised (demonstrations, civil unrests..)
- threat of terrorism
- POLICE STATES
-> police operates outside framework + accountable to neither the courts nor the general public
- extrajudicial
- totalitarian features
- excessive and unregualted power
- designed to curtail civil liberty
- all aspects of social existence fall under police control
- acts as priv army controled by ruling elite
- THE MILITARY AND DOMESTIC POLITICS. 4 characteristics
- instrument of war
- virtual monopoly of weaponry
- substantial coercive power
- loyalty essential - organized/ disciplined bodies
- hierarchy of ranks
- strict obedience - distinctive culture and set of values
- prepared to kill, fight and die
- often seen as deeply authoritarian
- tradition - seen as ‘above politics’
- guarantee security and integrity of the state
- repository of the national interest
- HOW CAN THE MILITARY BE POLITICAL?
- guarantee of domestic order
- blurred line btw ‘public’ instrument and ‘political weaponry’
- states with acute civilian unrest beyond police’s capacity
- military becomes the only prop of regime to safeguard it from popular rebellion or revolution
-> constitutionalism and consent is abandoned - alternative to civilian rule
- establishment of military rule
- prop up unpopular gov/regime
- remove/replace governing elite
- completely topple the regime
can displace civilian politicians
- > highlights chronic weakness, intractable divisions and endemic corruption of civilian gov
MONOPOLY OF CHIEF INSTRUMENTS OF LEGITIMATE VIOLENCE IN THE POLITICAL SYSTEMS
- STRUCTURE OF THE MILITARY
- hierarchical
- centralized
- place a premium on rapid communications
- VALUES
- fundamental importance
- bureaucratic obedience
to rank, not to person holding it
unthinking cooperation - stand above sectional, vested-interest conflicts in politics
embodiment of national-interest
authoritarian, disciplined conception - dominated by one ethnic group (might be the centre of conflict in society)
- LIVING CONDITIONS
- seprate barracks (separation from civilians)
- distinctive uniforms
- indoctrination of recruits
history and tradition
- article: link to politics
- may be used to protect the armed forces from civilian mismanagement (foreign aggression)
- military pressure may result from junior officers being dissatisfied with promotion prospects
- belief that it is the only body aware of what constitutes the true national interest
only body capable of implementing policies to protect that interest
12.1 what do pol attitudes depend on?
- nature and degree of professionalism
- prestige in society
- pride and separateness
- social backgrounds (elite or lower class)
- degree of specialization
- pol experience and influence - nature of political system
- direct military intervention less likely in:
industrialized lib democracies
socialist systems controlled by 1 party
- direct military more likely in:
civilian gov lacking prestige
govs w serious weaknesses (lack the basis of legitimacy that govs have)