T_Policy Changes Flashcards
Surrender Value Principles
Principles to consider
- PRE (short durations, close to maturity, auction value)
- Comparison vs premiums paid and NB projections
- Comparison vs maturity values
- <= earned asset share in aggregate
- SV given by competitors
- Must not change frequently
- Ease of application
- Clear documentation
- Avoid anti-selection against insurer
- Surrender and re-entry
- Surrender Value on Unit Linked contracts –> bid value less penalty
Calculating Surrender Values
Profit = Earned Asset share – Surrender Value
SV Retrospective method
- Earned asset share at surrender date
- Max company can pay without loss
- Looks low at early durations
- Doesn’t consider profit company would have made – s/h / p/h equity?
- Won’t run into maturity value
- Can product values that are very different from prospective value and competitors
- Relatively easy to calculate if have past information
- No retention of profit
SV Prospective method
What policy is worth to company (on realistic basis)
-May exceed earned asset share
-May look unreasonable to p/h early on
-Will run into maturity value
-Comparable across competitors if assumptions similar
-Easy to calculate since no requirement of past experience
-Profit depends between pricing basis and Surrender -Value basis as well as the following
>Interest
>Expenses
>Inflation
>Mortality
Policy Alteration Overview
- Conversion to paid up
- Change in term, sum assured, premium
-Paid up sums assured requirements
>Supportable by earned asset share at conversion
>Consistent with maturity values (taking missing premiums into account)
>Surrender Value before and after conversion similar
-Unit Linked
>PUP – units stay attached (possibly deduct penalty)
>Premium and/or Sum Assured increases/decreases
>Changes in retirement date
Key Alteration Principles
Terms after alteration to be supportable by earned asset share at date of alteration
Surrender – limiting case in reduction of term
PUP conversion – limiting case in reduction of sum assured
New policy premium – similar to premium for benefit increase
Same premium if altered to self excl expenses (stability)
Avoid lapse and re-entry
Benefit increase should require underwriting
Recover cost of alteration (affordability)
Ease of calculation
Key Alteration Principles - boundary conditions
Surrender – limiting case in reduction of term
PUP conversion – limiting case in reduction of sum assured
New policy premium – similar to premium for benefit increase
Policy Alteration Methods
Consider Alteration Principles when assessing methods
Proportionate paid-up values
Equating policy values
Reserve before = Reserve after + Cost of Alteration
Surrender Value re-spread to reduce future premiums (not for PUP conversions)
Paid-up policy value plus premium for balance of sum assured
Accumulation of premium arrears/surplus (not for PUP conversions)
Profit depends on bases and terms used in setting alterations
Consider each method in turn