Systematic Reviews Flashcards

1
Q

What are systematic reviews?

A
  • Review of all literature
  • On one particular topic/question
  • Using scientific methods
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reasons for differences between RCTs

A
  • Chance
  • Differences in people
  • Differences in intervention/comparator
  • Differences in care other than that being investigated
  • Differences in the way treatment effects are assessed
  • Differences in follow-up
  • Reporting of the available evidence
  • Selection from the available evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is publication bias?

A

When publication of research results depends on their nature and direction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Types of publication bias

A
  • Positive result bias
  • Outcome reporting bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is positive result bias?

A

When authors are more likely to submit, or editors accept, positive than negative or inconclusive results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is outcome reporting bias?

A

When several outcomes within a trial are measure but are reported selectively depending on the strength and direction of those results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Issues systematic reviews attend to

A
  • Large volume of information
  • Low-quality information drowns out high-quality?
  • Cannot find/read the right evidence for the specific needs
  • Must critically evaluate the methodological rigor and statistically analyse each study
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Review definition

A

Any attempt to summarise information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Benefits of reviews

A
  • Volume of literature condensed
  • New information made accessible
  • Some have taken considerable time to find all info + review topic well
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hierarchy of evidence for effectiveness (top to bottom)

A
  • Systematic reviews
  • RCTs
  • Cohort studies
  • Case control studies
  • Case series’ + reports
  • Expert opinion, “anecdotal” evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Stages in a systematic review

A
  • Define question
  • Write protocol
  • Search for evidence/studies
  • Select relevant evidence
  • Appraise studies
  • Extract, analyse + summarise data
  • Interpret review results
  • Discussion + conclusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What criteria are used to define the question for a systematic review?

A

PICO:
- Population
- Intervention
- Comparison
- Outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a meta-analysis?

A

Statistical technique used to combine the quantitative results from a number of studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Advantages of a systematic review

A
  • Can be best source of evidence
  • Assimilation of large amounts of research
  • Provide reliable, unbiased estimates of effect
  • Increase precision of estimates of effect
  • Provide info about generisability + consistency of effect
  • Identify what info is missing
  • Useful for making decisions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is internal validity?

A

Degree to which the effect of the observed is attributable to the evidence, rather than any other cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is external validity?

A

Degree to which the review’s conclusions apply to other person in other places/times

17
Q

3 parts of the critical appraisal process

A
  • Is the review trustworthy/valid? (internal validity)
  • What were the results?
  • How will the results help? (external validity)
18
Q

10 critical appraisal questions for a systematic review

A
  • Did the review ask a clearly focused question
  • Did the review include the right type of study
  • Did the reviewers try to identify all relevant studies
  • How did the reviewers decide which studies to include + did they assess the quality of the included
  • If the results of the studies have been combined, was it reasonable to do so
  • How are the results presented and what is the main result
  • How precise are these results
  • Can the results be applied to the local population
  • Were all important outcomes considered
  • Should policy or practice change as a result of the evidence contained in the review