Studies Flashcards

1
Q

Dadarrio et al. (2007) and criticisms/critiques

A

AB design.
Teacher removed M&M from bowl to be shared with class each time there was a disruptive behaviour.
–> Decreased rate of negative behaviours per minute

But baseline was not stable enough; could have been other factors that accounted for behaviour change; could the teacher’s behaviour change account for the children’s?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Krentz et al. (2016)

A

ABAB reversal.
Token reinforcement to increase distance walked in adults with mild-moderate learning difficulties.
–> effective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Groden & Cautela (1988)

A

Multiple baseline.
Whether covert reinforcement could improve verbal initiation in 3 adolescents presenting mild autism; asked them what it would be like to initiate contact with another learner.
–> effective for 2 subjects (Ralph & Lee Ann) but less stable baseline for Phil limits conclusions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Hua et al. (2020)

A

Alternating treatment design.
Effects of two reading interventions in increasing the amount of ideas and details recalled: paraphrasing (paraphrase when they read) vs paraphrasing + vocab (“this is the meaning of 3 words you will read”).
–> effectiveness differed across subjects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Kazdin (2019)

A

Changing criterion design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Joel Greenspoon

A

distinguished reward from reinforcer
–> “mhmm” after plural noun increased rate of plural nouns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Allen et al. (1974)

A

ABAB reversal.
Ann showed little interaction with children.
First intervention: provided adult attention for child interaction –> not effective
Second intervention: provided a toy when she engaged in play with children –> more effective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

France & Hudson (1990)

A

Multiple baseline.
Families instructed not to enter room when child wakes in the night.
–> night waking reduced to 0 for all.
BUT consider attachment theory and how lack of sleep affects parent-child relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rekers & Lovaas (1974)

A

Differential reinforcement of incompatible behaviour.
Reducing inappropriate gender role behaviour in a 5yr old (Craig).
Extinction: feminine behaviours; mother to ignore Craig.
Reinforcement: masculine behaviours; mother gave him attention.
–> broadly reduced feminine behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dorsey et al. (1980)

A

Individual reversal designs.
Evaluated the effect of a fine water mist applied to the face of individuals with profound learning difficulties contingent upon performance of self-injurious behaviours.
–> mist was effective
Subsequently paired with “no”.
–> when tested “no” alone it reduce behaviour rate (conditioned reinforcer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Keller & Schoenfeld

A

Code voice method for morse code

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Keintz et al. (2011)

A

Discrimination training in children with ASD and intellectual disabilities/complex educational needs.
teaching coin values.
Instruction provided and child to indicate the correct coin.
Pick 5 cents when 5 cents instructed = behaviour reinforced; instruction was SD
Picked 5 cents when 1 cents instructed = behaviour not reinforced; instruction was S-delta.
–> effective (both children learned to select coins).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

O’Neill et al. (2022)

A

Alternating treatment design.
Trained 4 children with ASD/CENs to identify flags.
Used prompt fading: compared 5 second progressive prompt delay to constant prompt delay.
–> for one P, PPD seemed more effective (but other Ps showed different results).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ghaemmaghami et al. (2018)

A

Shaping communication responses in 4 children to use over aggression and other severe behaviour problems.
Used successive approximations.
Trained topography (response got more complex) and latency (getting them to say something that takes more time than the aggressive reaction).
–> each time the steps were trained there was an improvement in the trained behaviour, and previous behaviours were reduced to zero (as under extinction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Sivaraman et al. (2021)

A

Getting children to tolerate a face mask.
First used chaining then used shaping (shaped dimension of tolerating the mask from 3-60s).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Moore & Quintero (2018)

A

Compared clean and snatch responses using forward and backward training.
Snatch response first assigned to forward, clean to backward.
–> snatch showed steady improvement to mastery criterion whereas clean did not.
–> applying forward chaining to clean response was effective.

17
Q

Reeve et al. (2007)

A

Applied generalisation guidelines 3 and 4 during establishing a generalised repertoire of helping behaviour in children with special needs.
Multiple sessions.
Naturally maintaining contingencies: identified stimulus conditions under which children would typically offer to help; broke these down into SDs and used a combination of them to show the child the situations adults might need help in.
Training sufficient exemplars: identified/created several categories of situations where someone might need help and trained under each using different exemplars; trained 75% only.
–> improvement during training stage.
–> probed conditions not trained to see if skills generalised –> they did (saw improvement).
–> non-helping situation used to ensure they could correctly discriminate SD from S-delta –> child was capable.

18
Q

Tom (case study)

A

Multiple disabilities; removed from school; 1000-1200 instances of self-injurious behaviour in 16hr periods.
FBA: social positive reinforcement (people around his during negative behaviours).
Taught alternative behaviour: ACC device to call for attention when he wanted it (get more 1:1 interaction).
Proactive strategy: brought more people to him to talk/read to him unsolicited; trained in independent activities during which he did not need someone with him at all times.
–> combined strategies showed gradual reduction in self-injurious behaviour until the point when Tom could get back to school.

19
Q

Rajaraman et al. (2021)

A

9yr-old boy who eloped from classroom and climbed trees; eventually removed from school.
Gradually shaped a complex communication response.
Enhanced choice model: gave him training to choose between whether he wanted to stay in practice (communication response shaping), go to a hangout room, or terminate the session and return home.
–> child learned to use choice model.

20
Q

Murray (case example)

A

Missed more runs after starting full-time work; when he returned home he was tired and hungry and usually sat in from of the TV and ate snacks.
Goal setting: run 5 miles on 5 days a week.
Functional assessment: hungry when got home; sat down; ate snacks; immediate positive outcomes blocked the delayed positive outcome of being healthy/feeling better generally.
Self-management strategies: shaping (start with 1mile, increase by 1mile each week); antecedent control (eat snack at 3pm so not hungry when returning home); consequence control (join running group to get positive consequences of meeting others for going running; holds him accountable).

21
Q

Pitts et al. (in prep)

A

Children with intellectual disability
–> behaviour analysis of 1hr per day for 1yr led to 2yrs worth of gains made in the year; and this was just as good as other data for children getting 40hrs a week of one-to-one therapy.

22
Q

Maggie’s example of a non-verbal autistic child who enjoyed the lift

A

Gave him access to the lift he enjoyed non-contingently
–> effective

23
Q

Maggie’s food acceptance example

A

Gave the child a subtle programme where tiny amounts of pudding were provided until they reaches acceptance; if the child said no, they stopped.

24
Q

Millie Blandford-Elliot

A

4-6-year-olds with behaviour that was so aggressive that they had been expelled from mainstream primary school.
In the 2yrs before the intervention, there was frequent restraints used
–> after the behavioural approach there was no restraint use.

25
Q

Morgan et al.

A

PBS Halton: local authority service helping decrease challenging behaviour and reintegrate people into their communities
–> works with people with significant cases
–> 90% showed reduction in challenging behaviour
–> 62% showed an increase of functional skills
–> 77% increased engagement with meaningful activity
–> 40% increased community participation.