Structures 2: metabolic and electrophysiological imaging Flashcards
Where did the rumor come from that we only use 10% of our brain and why is it not true?
-came from people misunderstanding PET imaging - there is variability in metabolic activity in the brain and this goes up and down and does not vary more than 5-10% so your brain at rest if consuming about the same metabolism as when you are thinking really hard
What is PET and what does it look for?
positron emission tomography - first made it possible to observe metabolic responses in the whole brain at once
What metabolic change does PET look at?
the change in concentration of oxygen metabolism in the brain - this is done by measuring the amount of deoxyhemoglobin in certain parts of the brain
What is the typical protocol for PET imaging?
-have a stimulate protocol where you flash stuff on a screen and control protocol where there is a blank screen
-for both groups of people in either protocol there is plenty of deoxygenated hemoglobin in the brain - but you can take the difference of these two images and see which area is implicated in the stimulate protocol versus the control - i.e. see the visual cortex is implicated in the stimulate protocol more than the control protocol
What logical type is used in PET scanning?
-first subtraction method was used now we use inferential diffrence
Why is PET imaging helpful?
can look at activity in the brian in vivo and see what tissue in the brain is active over a certain time period
What happens in PET analysis when you average the difference in images over multiple people?
you get one of these ubiquitous images of what lights up when you process visual stimuli
What is the size of the difference in metabolic activity in PET scans in between conditions (stimulate vs control protocol) compared to the background activity level?
very small
What gets averaged out in the aggregated averaged group image of the difference of activity level?
many blobs of micellaneous individual activity in the group image
What was one of the first papers that tried to isolate more abstract cognitive functions with metabolic imaging and what logic used in analysis?
“PET studies of cortical anatomy of single word processing”
-subtraction logic
What was a difficulty they found with the “PET studies of cortical anatomy of single word processing” study?
it as difficult to truly isolate a single function even with carefully selected tasks
What is PET typically used for?
can radiolabel many things and is sued for detecting cancer since cancer cells take certain chemicals in higher degree so can radiolabel the chemical and do targeted imaging in that way - put radioactive chemical in the blood and people do not do PET studies out of curiosity they need a good motivation to give to people
How does PET imaging mirror cognitive psychologists trying to isolation functions?
-subtraction method - i.e. Donders and push a button when you see white flash versus black and white flash and take the difference in reaction time to see what happens
-cognitive psychologist - isolate functions chronometrically
-PET imaging - isolate functions via visualitzation of metabolism in the brain
What was the paradigm design in the “PET studies of cortical anatomy of single word processing” study?
-sensory task = control state –> fixation point only versus stimulates state —-> passive words (OVERALL TASK - passive sensory word processing modality specific word code)
-output task = control state –> passive words versus stimulates state —-> repeat words (OVERALL TASK - articulatory code motor programming and motor output)
-association task = control state –> repeat words versus stimulates state —-> generate uses (OVERALL TASK - semantic association selection for action)
-the stimulated task is the control of the other task so this allows you to use subtraction logic to see what area is part of what certain function and do not get extra regions of activation associated with a task since other task is accidentally nestled in it
What did the axial (horizontal plane) heat maps show in the “PET studies of cortical anatomy of single word processing” study?
-they are based on a series of subtractions of these conditions from one another
-spatial normalization was used in this so they would line up pet images with a ct scan and they would publish heat maps without underlying map of brain tissue
-we see auditor stimulation in the superior temporal gyrus (comprehension)
-and visual stimulation is in the back of the brain
What was unique in the findings of the “PET studies of cortical anatomy of single word processing” study?
-the first two subtractions for sensory and auditory tasks were done as a check - do you get sensory areas for listening and reading; do you get motor areas for talking
-the association contrast is the innovation here - they saw activity in the left inferior frontal gyrus and the anterior cingulate
How does PET differ from fMRI analyses?
-pet imaging uses subtraction logic while
-in modern fmri analyses these are usually the results of inferential statistical tests for differences between conditions
In the “PET studies of cortical anatomy of single word processing” study the locations of maximum contrast were rendered as single points, what were the findings in regards to these points?
-the filled points were the visual task
-the unfilled points were the auditory task
SENSORY TASK
-the filled (visual) sensory triangles are occipital and they sit where we expect them to be at very low levels of processing
-the unfilled (auditory) sensory triangles is along the superior temporal gyrus which is comprehension - bilaterally - one of them which is wernickes area
MOTOR TASK (OUTPUT)
-visual and auditory filled and unfilled circles line the motor strip with the central sulcus which divides the parietal and motor cortex so the production of the output is relying both on sensory and motor areas of the brain - they both overlap and line the central sulcus motor strip which means the brain does not discriminate between the visual and auditory for motor production
ASSOCIATION TASK
-the squares are right lateralized which means that the semantic manipulation of the word comes from brocas area of the inferior frontal gyrus for both the sensory and auditory inputs
Why is it not an accident that neuroimaging and cognitive psychology are animated by the same logic?
-the technology used in cognitive neuroscience is impressive on its face
-what is harder to grasp is the importance of well designed theoretically motivated cognitive tasks - without a solid theoretical foundation cognitive neuroscience would be high tech phrenology
-they could also define cognitive processes and use subtraction logic to localize function to structure - need a solid theoretical foundation so need to be careful with the questions we ask cause we are doing the same thing just with higher tech
What is fMRI? How does it compare to PET?
-functional magnetic resonance imaging - a form of metabolic imaging as well
-it is less invasive than PET because it uses a powerful magnetic field rather than radiation to create images
What is fmri looking at?
the concentration of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin which is collected in the capillaries so we are not looking at tissue we are looking at concentrations in capillaries near neurons - measure oxygen metabolism
What is the magnet strength in fmri?
-the magnet is 3 Tesla or at most 1.5 tesla or 3 tesla - the more powerful the magnet the more uncomfortable to be in
What can be tuned to produce different frequency contrasts in imaging?
the radiofrequency pulse
In fMRI what is the rf pulse tuned to show?
that the signal reflects the ratio of deoxygenated to oxygenated hemoglobin
What is ultimately measured in fmri?
the Blood Oxygen Level Dependent or BOLD response
What to raw images look like in fmri versus processed ones?
raw images - are black and white
processed images - post statistical analysis and are colored as a result of the statistical analysis
-eventually want to know what happens when we do an inferential test to compare one condition to another