Strengthening the Bonds of Trust between Law Enforcement and the Public Flashcards
Organizational Culture and Values
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
Organizational cultures are SOCIAL NETWORKS that exist in ALL work environments, including LAW ENFORCEMENT.
Each agency has a UNIQUE culture, where OFFICERS and LEADERSHIP develop a set of ATTITUDES and BELIEFS about the JOB and COMMUNITY they serve.
Those attitudes can be NEGATIVE or POSITIVE and are PRIMARILY influenced by INFORMAL LEADERSHIP and TRAINING.
Involvement with the community
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
An agency’s OPERATIONAL SUCCESS is affected by the personnel’s FAMILIARITY and INTERACTIONS with the COMMUNITY the agency SERVES.
Quite often, where community interaction is MOST FRAGILE, the PUBLIC is UNDERREPRESENTED in MEETINGS and FORUMS.
Understanding diverse populations
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
There is a NEED for CONTINUING TRAINING for OFFICERS on how to RESPOND with PROFESSIONALISM and EMPATHY to people who are DIFFERENT from THEM.
An agency’s POLICIES, PRACTICES, and STAFF should REFLECT that the agency VALUES, APPRECIATES and IMPARTIALLY responds to DIVERSE populations.
Workforce diversity
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
RECRUITING and HIRING (DIVERSE) candidates can be CHALLENGING, so not ALL police agencies have a STAFF that MIRRORS the COMPOSITION of the COMMUNITIES they SERVE.
LACK of REPRESENTATION within the AGENCY may lead to DISTRUST by citizens WHO feel UNDERREPRESENTED.
Gaps in post-basic training
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
The BASIC RECRUIT PROGRAM gives recruits FOUNDATIONAL KNOWLEDGE for the JOB, but ESTABLISHED officers may have GAPS in their KNOWLEDGE concerning NEW TECHNIQUES and CHANGES in POLICIES and PROCEDURES.
Once ON the job, OFFICERS are REQUIRED to maintain CONTINUING education to RETAIN certification, BUT there is a STRONG NEED for BETTER and MORE timely POST-BASIC COURSES in ALTERNATIVE formats (DISTANCE LEARNING, SELF-PACED INSTRUCTION, and INTERNET-BASED COURSES, which WILL meet the TRAINING NEED as well as the NON-TRADITIONAL JOB SCHEDULE of a law enforcement officer.
Skill building and maintenance
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
Skills DETERIORATE over time IF they are NOT practiced REGULARLY.
If an officer DOES NOT have REGULAR training in a particular SKILL, such as DEFENSIVE TACTICS, FIREARMS and INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION, they may NOT be able to PERFORM the necessary tasks UNDER PRESSURE.
Lack of knowledge of cross-cultural norms
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
Each GROUP and COMMUNITY has its OWN culture; law enforcement officers from OUTSIDE that group or community may NOT always have an UNDERSTANDING of the SUBTLE FORMS of COMMUNICATION within the GROUP.
The same PRINCIPLE applies to MEMBERS of the public NOT always understanding the PROCEDURES of LAW ENFORCEMENT.
This can LEAD to MISUNDERSTANDINGS and MISINTERPRETATIONS of WORDS and ACTIONS by BOTH the PUBLIC and LAW ENFORCEMENT.
Interpersonal communications and use of force
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
GOOD COMMUNICATION, CRITICAL THINKING, and SOUND JUDGEMENT are CRUCIAL for determining WHEN officers SHOULD use force and when they SHOULD try OTHER METHODS to RESOLVE CONFLICT.
This is particularly IMPORTANT when RESPONDING to SITUATIONS that have the POTENTIAL to become VOLATILE.
Conflict and challenges to authority
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
Taking things PERSONALLY and REACTING to perceived INSULTS or CHALLENGES to AUTHORITY are INNATELY HUMAN TENDENCIES.
However, those responses INHIBIT effective policing.
Public understanding of the criminal justice system
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
The public does NOT always understand the STRUCTURE of the CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM or the POWERS and LIMITATIONS of VARIOUS AGENCIES, which leads to UNREALISTIC expectations.
Dynamics of power
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
In ANY relationship, there is RARELY an EQUAL balance of POWER at ALL times.
This can cause REACTIONS of INFLEXIBILITY, AGGRESSION, FEAR, and ANGER.
Having OR lacking POWER can NEGATIVELY affect COMMUNICATION between LAW ENFORCEMENT and the COMMUNITY and MAKE conflict MORE likely.
Assumptions and bias
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
In ANY relationship, each PARTY has PRECONCEIVED BELIEFS about the OTHER and DESIRES to see CERTAIN BEHAVIORS based UPON those BELIEFS.
Whether REASONABLE or NOT, when someone EXPERIENCES or OBSERVES the UNDESIRABLES behavior of a MEMBER of a GROUP, they may FORM a NEGATIVE opinion of the ENTIRE group.
STUDIES find that BIAS, both IMPLICIT and EXPLICIT exists in ALL people.
This does NOT necessarily LEAD citizens AND officers to TREAT others UNFAIRLY, but it makes that MORE likely.
Historical relationship between law enforcement and minority communities
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
MANY groups have PROBLEMATIC relationships WITH law enforcement.
These GROUPS include RACIAL MINORITIES, IMMIGRANTS, RELIGIOUS MINORITIES, and THE LGBTQ community, WHO may MISTRUST law enforcement for REASONS that have EVOLVED from PAST ENCOUNTERS and EXPERIENCES.
Law enforcement response to complex social or medical disorders
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
Because there is often NO other ALTERNATIVE, law enforcement officers are REGULARLY called on to handle ISSUES that would be BETTER managed by SOCIAL WORKERS and MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS such as responding to a PERSON with MENTAL ILLNESS, SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS, or MEDICAL CONDITIONS that MIMIC these ISSUES.
The PUBLIC has come to EXPECT officers to be FULLY equipped to be COUNSELORS, REFEREES, MEDICS, and SURROGATE CAREGIVERS.
News Media
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
TRADITIONALLY, community journalists worked in PARTNERSHIP with local law enforcement agencies to get NEWS and INFORMATION out to the PUBLIC.
With the SWITCH to a 24-HOUR news cycle, and the public’s increasing RELIANCE on SOCIAL MEDIA and NON-JOURNALISTS as a NEWS and INFORMATION sharing SOURCE, there is a GREATER tendency for NEWS OUTLETS to PUBLISH stories as they are DEVELOPING.
When NEWS organizations TRY to get the STORY out to the public AHEAD of their COMPETITORS and BEFORE all the FACTS of an incident are KNOWN, any ENCOUNTER between LAW ENFORCEMENT and the PUBLIC may put an OFFICER or AGENCY in the SPOTLIGHT.
Social Media
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
Social media users FORWARD stories, upload videos of their ENCOUNTERS with law enforcement, and ORGANIZE protests or ADVOCATE for action.
Because the PUBLIC is UNDER NO obligation to VET information or INCLUDE all of the facts of an incident, the information the public distributes can be UNRELIABLE or UNVERIFIED.
Law enforcement agencies have a DIFFICULT time COUNTERING such POSTS because of the NEED for CONFIDENTIALITY of information during ONGOING investigations.
In addition, when an agency POSTS information highlighting POSITIVE stories or INTERACTIONS, the public MAY view these with SKEPTICISM.
One FINAL ELEMENT is law enforcement officers’ OFF-DUTY use of SOCIAL MEDIA and the SCRUTINY their posts may RECEIVE.
Public perception of crime statistics
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
Reported CRIME STATISTICS are used in MANY ways, such as AGENCY administrators’ use of CRIME STATS to seek BUDGET INCREASES.
When CRIME STATISTICS are provided WITHOUT context, it can be HARD for the AUDIENCE to UNDERSTAND a situation, such as the IMPACT of UNDER-EMPLOYMENT on CRIMES OF OPPORTUNITY.
How CRIME STATISTICS are used can LEAD to MISCONCEPTIONS about a GROUP, COMMUNITY, or LAW ENFORCEMENT.
These MISCONCEPTIONS can CAUSE barriers in COMMUNICATION, MISTRUST, and CONFLICT.
Allocation of resources
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
In MANY towns, there are NOT enough law enforcement officers to EFFECTIVELY combat crime and ACTIVELY ENGAGE citizens in the COMMUNITY.
Some agencies have SUFFERED budget cuts, which CAUSE difficulties RECRUITING and RETAINING QUALITY officers.
INTERACTIONS between law enforcement and the public MAY be LIMITED only to RESPONDING to crime DUE to fewer officers.
This means LESS opportunity for interaction BEYOND the RESPONSE to CALLS FOR SERVICE.
Fear
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
The PUBLIC and OFFICERS may be HYPERSENSITIVE to THREATS, both PERCEIVED and REAL.
In some cases that FEAR may be BASED on HISTORICAL or SITUATIONAL information RATHER than DIRECT PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.
Legitimacy
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
The public’s TRUST in the police DEPENDS on WHETHER law enforcement’s authority is PERCEIVED as APPROPRIATE, PROPER, and JUST.
If police authority is NOT seen as LEGITIMATE, the public will NOT cooperate with the police.
SOCIAL DISTANCE between POLICE and the PUBLIC, as well as DEFIANCE of POLICE authority WILL increase.
As a result, HOSTILITIES between the POLICE and the PUBLIC will INCREASE while trust DECREASES.
Trust
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
The RELATIONSHIP between communities and THEIR law enforcement agencies are OFTEN characterized by VARYING degrees of SUSPICION and MISTRUST.
OVER TIME, that CONTRIBUTES to CYNICISM in BOTH groups and CREATES barriers to GOOD faith COOPERATION.
NATIONALLY, there are AMPLE cases of REPAIRED relationships, so COMMUNITIES are CAPABLE of BUILDING MUTUAL TRUST and PRODUCING POSITIVE CHANGE.
These SUCCESS stories SHARE several FOUNDATIONAL CONCEPTS and PRACTICES that can be ADAPTED and APPLIED to MEET any community’s UNIQUE needs.
Fair, Unbiased Policing
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
A review of current research finds that everyone has biases, including well-intentioned people.
The purpose of providing training on fair, unbiased policing (also known as fair and impartial policing) is to help individuals to be aware of their own biases and learn how to manage them effectively.
Biases are preconceived tendencies or beliefs that can cause barriers in communication, or if you are self-aware, assist in communication with others.
As law enforcement and the public act to build trust, being self-aware will aid in their communication, whether it is a town hall meeting, traffic stop, or some other interaction.
Procedural Justice
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
Procedural justice is not a new concept in policing.
It is a practical concept that promotes healthy and reciprocal relations with the community to enhance safety for both officers and the community.
It’s aim is to ensure fair police-citizen interactions and the development of strong partnerships with the community members.
In order to be effective, it must be applied both internally and externally within a law enforcement organization by taking into account how officers are treated as the agency level and how people are treated in the community.
When we look at police encounters that have gained nationwide attention during the last several years, in many instances, the officer’s actions during the encounter had just as much of an effect on public perception as the outcome of the encounter.
Procedural justice in policing focuses on fairness in the processes as well as the outcome.
Procedural Justice
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
Procedural Justice is grounded in four foundational pillars which affect the officer and the public:
- Fairness and consistency of rule application
- Voice and representation in the process
- Transparency and openness of the process
- Impartiality and unbiased decision making
Fairness and consistency of rule application
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
The perception of fairness is not just about outcomes; be consistent in your decision making and treat people with respect.
Voice and representation in the process
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
Involve groups in the decisions that affect them and listen to their concerns.
Transparency and openness of the process
Strengthening the bonds of trust between law enforcement and the public
Decisions are made without secrets and deception.