Stereotypes Flashcards
Define stereotypes, prejudice and discrimination
Stereotype: belief/knowledge schemas about certain attributes of a group - COGNITIVE
Prejudice: based on stereotypes; negative/positive attitudes towards a certain group - EMOTION
Discrimination: unfair treatment of members based on group - BEHAVIOUR
Define dehumanisation
- denying human characteristics to a group - objectification
Describe the stereotype content model (Fiske, Cuddy and Glicke)
- judgements of attributes based on: warmth (likeable?) and competence (intelligent?)
- mapping this out allows for the formation of stereotype
- Low competence, low warmth = white trash = contempt/fear
- Low competence, high warmth = elderly = pity
- High competence, low warmth = rich people, feminist = resentment
- High competence, high warmth = our ingroups = admiration
Describe economic causes for stereotypes
- competition with outgroups over valuable/scarce resources
- Realistic group conflict theory - Levine and Campbell:
- groups competing for territory, jobs, power limited resource
- prejudice greatest when group has a lot to lose
- e.g. after civil rights movement, more antiblack and thus white working-class conflict - jobs
- can cause scapegoating - blaming entire groups for issues - not logical
Describe the Robber’s cave (Sherif et al) study and how it applies to economic causes of stereotypes
- 22 young boys in groups and do activities to foster unity
- beginning; didn’t know about the other group
- put together in competition with reward (limited) - group becomes obstacle
- led to conflict and ingroup favouritism
- tried and failed to reverse conflict by just putting them in a non-competitive setting
- reduced conflict successfully when adding superordinate goals; working together to gain rewards (water break/lorry) - prejudices went away
- economic competition sufficient to create biases and as competition increases with ingroups, cohesion increases with outgroups
Briefly describe motivation causes for stereotypes
- identification with an ingroup, frustration or social identity
- wanting to improve our own self-esteem - idea of basking in the reflected glory
- positive ingroup evaluations and negative outgroup evaluations encourage high self esteem
What is social identity theory?
- motivational causes
- a persons concept/esteem derived from personal identity and ignoring status
- viewing ingroup favourable to enhance self-concept and self-esteem
What is the minimal group paradigm?
- group biases can be based on limited information
- showing preferences and biases for ingroup even when distinctions are meaningless and arbitrary
What is Schaundefraudre?
- pleasure from outgroups pain
- Cikara - people feel good when bad things happen to the other group (opposing sports team)
Describe a study understanding motivational causes and stereotypes (Feris and Spencer, 1997)
- ppts told they failed/aced a test - their self esteem was threatened or affirmed
- watched an interview of a jew/non jew
- ppts rated job applicant and person self-esteem
- when they were affirmed, equal rating of the candidates
- when threatened, jew rated lower - helps cope and boosts self-esteem again
Briefly describe cognitive causes for stereotypes
- fast and frugal with thinking patterns
- stereotypes/prejudices; shortcutting information and reconstruct simply (world is too complex)
Describe Duncan’s study on construal
- white ppts witnessing two men in discussion
- black either shoves white or white shoves black
- when black pusher = coded as aggressive behaviour
- white pusher= coded as playful behaviour
- based on the context of stereotypes
- cognitive perspective; assumes prejudice is a function of people trying to use less mental resources
What is the outgroup homogeneity effect?
- assumes all outgroups are all alike and members ingroup vary and have distinctive features
- Princeton and Ruger’s student study:
- ppts watching student make a decision, 1/2 though the student was from Princeton and 1/2 thought from Rugers
- asked what percent of students at the same uni as the student would make the same choice
- ppts made higher % estimates when they though the student was from other uni
- they assume that their own group would be more variable in the opinion
What is the illusory correlation?
- incorrect belief that two things are related when they aren’t
- two low frequency events would form a co-association and seem stronger
- superstitions
- distinctive events capture attention
- cognitive bias/ distinctive (low freq - minority)
- minority - low freq and low freq of negative events
- but negative behaviours from minority are dubly distinct
- creates a pairing
Study- even tho the proportions are similar, minorities are seen as more negative
Are stereotypes efficient when being a cognitive miser?
Bodenhausen - 1990
- pre-screened ppts to see circadian rhythms
- read scenarios where main character is accused of cheating on a test
- ppts at low point of circadian - more likely to use stereotypes - less mental energy
Another:
- ppts had to perform 2 tasks (form impression of person whilst listening to tape; cog load)
- 1/2 were accompanied with stereotype for traits
- end - quizzed on both tasks
- people who had stereotypes given to them remembered both as less energy required to form an impression of just traits
- did better on the distraction task as better at remembering as less cog burden
- stereotypes are useful