Herds and Mobs Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is a group?

A

linked individuals that rely on each other to a specific degree (connection and dependence)
- thoughts and actions combine - group emerges from this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define herd mentality

A
  • conformity; YOU become the group, you’re not just part of it (crowd movement, protests, stock trading)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give Dyer’s (2008) research into herd mentality

A
  • 200 volunteers
  • randomly walk around, no talking
  • 10 confederates walked in specific directions and patterns
  • people blindly followed without even knowing
  • only takes 5% of confident people to influence the 95% of the others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how did Zimmerman (2018) research herd mentality?

A
  • 2 conditions; perform action synchronously or asynchronous in a dance club
  • no meanings just movements
  • asked how much they liked/ affiliated with the others in the group (a measurement of how closely they sat near each other)
  • synchronous condition; positive correlation with how much they liked each other (negative correlation with distance apart)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is positive herding online and give a study?

A
  • identification with a group, so sharing the values
  • online commentary and liking, endorsing the behaviour
  • valuing behaviour (and others follow)
  • Person posted something on reddit; upvotes, downvotes or nothing
  • community of signally
  • initially upvoted - 32% more likely to get more upvotes
  • artificially positively rated, 25% high average
  • formation of Echochambers online; retweeting within (online grouping) - black twitter
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a mob mentality?

A
  • negative consequences of herd mentality

- group emerges; more likely to be aggressive and violent in anonymous groups/settings (LE BON)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define deindividuation

A
  • anonymity - losing personal identity which increases violence and impulsivity = loss of self-awareness, thus less responsibility and disinhibited behaviours
  • the larger the group, more deindividuation, less accountability
  • enhanced by masks, uniform, darkness (decreases self)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe Diener (1976) research into deindividuation

A
  • recorded behaviour of 1,000 trick or treaters (negative characters)
  • asked 1/2 children their names
  • candy/coins on the table and the researcher left
  • deindividuation encourages stealing (more likely in groups)
  • those who gave their names were less likely to steal

However ; deindividuation doesn’t always lead to aggression - Gregam and 8 strangers - darkness causes intimacy
OR prosocial behaviour - Johnson and Downing - nurses costumes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a group decision making?

A
  • if the problem is precise and factual - group is better (pooling knowledge)
  • maintaining group cohesiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is groupthink?

A
  • ignoring facts and personal opinions in order to maintain group cohesiveness and solidarity (Vietnam)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Give a real life example of groupthink

A
  • 1961
  • JFK, Bay of PIgs (cold war)
  • Cuba issues
  • JFK approved a covert invasion at the Bay of Pigs with poorly trained exiles
  • died and surrendered
  • blind plan - “perfect failure” and his advisors did mot challenge his plans

IRVING JANIS (1971)

  • groupthink situation; high stakes, directive leader with strong views and group is cohesive
  • ignoring challenges and members want solidarity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Give symptoms of groupthink

A
  • illusion of invincibility, collective rationalisation, stereotypes of outgroups, illusion of unanimity
  • style of decision making where they uphold solidarity
  • self-censorship: withholding unpopular, controversial things (don’t want to reduce morale) - censor each other
  • failure to share insights = HORRIBLE, INCOMPLETE decisions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Give outcomes of groupthink

A
  • poor information
  • biased results and actions
  • failure to examine risks
  • failure to work out contingency plans
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How can we prevent groupthink?

A

1) impartiality of leader - don’t make opinions known so people won’t try to please
2) members must look at alternatives - designate devil’s advocate, get feedback from outsiders (promote correctness)
3) create subgroups - separate decisions
4) anonymous opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Bystander Intervention?

A
  • presence of others, people observing intervene to help
  • more people around, less likely to help (as you believe others will)
  • Kitty Genovese - 38 people watching - saw each other and all thought someone else would help (bystander effect)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why does the Bystander Effect occur?

A

Diffusion of responsibility

  • emergency and in ‘group’ - ambiguous leadership
  • assume others will help and more people = less individual responsibility

Pluralistic Ignorance

  • emergency, if no one else is concerned, collective ignorance
  • assume everything is fine so no one intervenes
  • ignorance of true norms
  • finding appropriate responses and finding cues
17
Q

Give evidence diffusion of responsibility

A
Darley and Latane (1968)
- ppts in cubicles through intercom
- 1-5 people 
- confed pretends to have a seizure ("someone help")
- likelihood of calling ambulance increased with smaller group size
1 person = 85% helped
3 people = 62% helped 
6 people = 31% helped

due to hesitancy

18
Q

Give evidence for pluralisitic ignorance

A
  • tendency to misperceive social norm

Latane and Darley (1968)

  • ppts filled out stack of Qs alone or with 2 real ppts or 2 confeds (that acted calmly)
  • smoke fills room
  • alone = 75% leave and report
  • 2 real = 38% leave and report
  • 2 calm confed = 10% leave and report
  • looked and learned from others, construed situation as non-threatening due to informational/ignorance