Speech and language Flashcards

1
Q

Intracarotid test

A

used in pts with intractable epilepsy being considered for surgical tx for epilepsy
catheter is routed into internal carotid and barbiturate injected to left or right side resulting in anestesia of greater part of hemisphere
pt has language tests to measure how well the unanaestetized hemi can perform them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

invasive test and only for ind with pre-exsisting brain fnx abnormatilies so this test may not be a good representation of population as a whole

A

Intracarotid test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

new imaging tech. Based on changes in ratio of oxyHb to deoxyHb in brain from moment to moment

A

fMRI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

cognitive activity correlated w/ change in this ratio that are involved in performing the activity
used to identify regions activated by cognitive task… is noninvasive and used in healthy

A

fMRI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

90% of population, Dextrals

A

right handed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

10% of population, Sinistrals

A

left handed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Atypical dominance patterns include

A

‘bilateral’ and ‘right’ hemisphere dominance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

more common in left handed relative to right handed individuals

A

Atypical dominance patterns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

most pts w/out early damage regardless of handedness are left-hemi dominant

A

left-hemi dominant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

incidence of atypical dominance ________in ind w/ early brane damage, ESPECIALLY for those w/ left or mixed handedness

A

increases dramatically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

fMRI results
1. show the area of language activation include what 4 regions?
( see variability w/in individual pts.)

A

left frontal, temporal and parietal regions and rt cerebellum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

More pts w/ epilepsy show __________ compared to healthy

A

symmetrc and rt hemisphere dominance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

More variability in ind with early or late brain damage

A

EARLY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Simular dominance patterns found in health leftys and lefy epileptics with______ onset brain damage

A

LATE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

lefty epileptic pts with evivdence of EARLY damage

A

see atypical dominance (crossed-dominance or symmetric dominance) which is high and associated with shift in handed: pathological left-handedness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In left hemisphere, devo of langauge after injury depends on

A

age at time of injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Damage Early in life (before 1 yr)

A

a. develops language functions but usually has a generalize decline intelligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Damage between 1-5

A

a. language devos typically but occurs at expense of development of non-linguistic skills (viso-spatial)
b. lang devo occurs in regions usually devoted to devo of non-linguistics and ‘crowds’ those areas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Damage After 5

A

a. specific abnormalities of lang skills that are apparent—implies the brain plasticity decreases w/ age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Selective injury to ant or post speech zones causes

A

shift of function associated w/ that zone only.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

injury to core or central speech zone may cause a

A

complete shift in languate fnx to the right hemi; called crossed-dominance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Cerebral dominance and left-handedness

A

atypical speech representation is more frequent in lefty and ambidextrous then rightys
healthy ind w/ no left-handed 1st degree relatives (negative familial sinistrality) have more typical lang representation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Which is more predictive of atypical dominance family history of left-handedness

A

family history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Negative correlation between LI and age suggests

A

langauge processing more symettric w/ age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Damage to far anterior or poster results in
no shift in language
26
Damage tosomewhat anterior regio or centered around region of speech see
a complete shift in language
27
Anterior region of language zone is key for
retrival/syntax/exresspive aspect~ damage we see shit of anterior funx
28
Damage to posterior or middle language zones:
Shift of posterior speech function when more posterior/middle damage we see comprehension affected
29
Do both hemis involving language look the same?
hemis aren’t mirrior images of each other in either morphology or funx—see minor shape dif in cylvian fissure and occipital lobe
30
How are hemis organized?
Hemis are organized dif in terms of how the perform secondary and tertiary levels of fnxs (like multi-modal funxs such as hand-eye coordination)
31
Lateralization of fnx is relative and complementary and______ with age before pubery and______ thereafter
increases | decrease
32
Disorders of speech all involve
malfunction of muscles of speech articulation!
33
How are disorders of speech and disorders of language different (aphasias)
they are different from language disorders (aphasia) that you can get w/out the other and has own correlates
34
can be psychological or neuro | neuro: IG occurs in context of syndrome such as akinetic mutism (thought to be d/t failure to initiate action)
Mutism
35
Mutism can result from:
Extensive bifrontal brain disease or bilateral lesions in SUPPLEMENTARY motor area responsible
36
D/t injury to peripheral NS enervating muscles of vocal chords and ≠ sound production
Aphonia
37
Able to produce vocal sounds (grunts, groans, sound like features) but cant generate speech
Aphemia
38
Aphemia is considered a
disconnected syndome
39
d/t white matter lesion beneath Broca’s area that severs the final output path for speech production
Aphemia
40
impaired capacity to articulate speech~ more about muscles of speech or discordination
Dysarthria
41
All aphasias can be classified by integrity of speech:
fluency/comprehension and repetition
42
Most important classification of integrity of speech
fluency is more important to focus on… heslp us localize brain dysnfunction to anterior or posterior regions
43
Non-fluent aphasias—occur with dysfnx to
ANTERIOR regions
44
Fluent aphasias—occur with dysfnx to
POSTERIOR brain regions
45
Fluency; | evaluated on 3 dimensions
Phrase length (maximum number of words per utterance) Degree of apparent effort in production of speech Prosody—preservation of melodic elements of speech
46
Nonfluent speech characterized by
contains less then 3 words in utterance, labroius in produciton and monotonic
47
Evaluation of fluency:
a. ask pt open ended questions or to describe complex picture (Boston Asphasia Exam)
48
Global aphasia fluency: comprehension: repetition:
fluency: none comprehension: none repetition: none when functions of both anterior and posterior aspects of core language zones impaired
49
Isolation of speech fluency: comprehension: repetition:
fluency: none comprehension: none repetition: intact
50
Brocas fluency: comprehension: repetition:
fluency: none comprehension: intact repetition: none
51
Transcortical motor: fluency: comprehension: repetition:
fluency: none comprehension: intact repetition: intact
52
Wernickes fluency: comprehension: repetition:
fluency: intact, paraphaisias present comprehension: none repetition: none
53
Transcortical sensory fluency: comprehension: repetition:
fluency: Yes, paraphiasias present comprehension: none repetition: intact
54
Conduction fluency: comprehension: repetition:
fluency: yes, paraphiasias present comprehension: intact repetition: none
55
Nominal, anomic amnesic fluency: comprehension: repetition:
fluency: intact comprehension: intact repetition: intact
56
fluency: none comprehension: none repetition: none when functions of both anterior and posterior aspects of core language zones impaired
Global aphasia
57
nonfluent aphasia that has profound impairment in speech articulation. Repetition speech impared d/t articulaiton difficulties
Brocas
58
Transcortical motor aphasis:
lesion to the premotor region or SMA
59
Transcortical aphasias: repetition is
PRESERVED
60
Transcortical sensory aphasia:
fluent aphasia associated with langague comprehension deficits at word level
61
Transcortical sensory aphasia lesion IG is at
- lesions IG at angular gyrus or post and infereior temporal lobe - repetition is preserved
62
Isolation aphasia:
when lesions of both transcortical motor and sensory aphasia present
63
when lesions of both transcortical motor and sensory aphasia present
Isolation aphasia
64
effectively isolates core speech zones from remainder of hemisphere
Isolation aphasia
65
Conduction aphasia: fluent aphasia associated with
profound impairment in repetition speech but preserved comprehension
66
-repetition deficit d/t impairment in auditory storage buffer needed to repeat speech sounds or perhaps the transmission path (arcuate fasciculus) btwn speech sound recognition and articulation centers
Conduction aphasia
67
The cortical zones in temporal, parietal and frontal regions that lie outside of the peri-Sylvain zone also makes
significant contributions to linguistic fnxs.