social: stereotypes Flashcards

1
Q

define social catagorisation

A

the process of assigning people to groups based on social categories e.g. age, race, gender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

collection of traits that society associates with a particular social group =

A

stereotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

a negative attitude held towards a social group and its members =

A

prejudice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

negative behaviours towards a person because of their group membership =

A

discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the difference between prejudice and discrimination?

A
prejudice = negative attitudes
discrimination = negative behaviours
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the tendency to view members of an outgroup as more similar to each other than members of an ingroup =

A

outgroup homogeneity effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the difference between an ingroup and an outgroup?

A

ingroup is where an individual feels a sense of membership, belonging and identity whereas an outgroup member doesn’t feel that way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

in the outgroup homogeneity effect, the ingroup are seen as more ______ and ______ whereas the outgroup are seen as more _______

A

more diverse and different

similar (homogenous)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how do we engage in social categorisation?

A

→ picture it like a ven diagram
→ probably don’t categorise on an ‘all or nothing’ basis
→ have fuzzy boundaries
→ revolve around a central prototype
→ category members vary in how much typicality they have to a group with reference to their prototype

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

prototypes =

A

cognitive representations of the most typical features of a category

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

why do we engage in social categorisation?

A

in order to understand → social categories are informative → aid person perception

social categories have accompanying stereotypes which allow us to make judgements about a persons disposition

we categorise because its adaptive for survival

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the consequence of social categorisation?

A

the outgroup homogeneity effect

this leads to stereotypes, prejudice, discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

describe Quattrone & Jones (1980) classic study that describes evidence for the outgroup homogeneity effect

A

method:
ppts watched videos of person from either their own uni or another uni make decision to wait on their own or in a group while the experimenter fixed broken equipment. The estimated the likelihood of the average member of that uni making the same decision.
results:
ppts predicted average outgroup uni student → respond in the same way
average ingroup uni student → respond in different way
interpretation:
ppts showed the outgroup homogeneity effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

why do we show the outgroup homogeneity effect?

A

most common explanation = Linville et al (1989)
LESS FAMILIARITY AND LESS DIVERSE EXPERIENCE

argument that we represent categories in terms of exemplars (examples of category members) and we make judgements based on the variation of exemplars we have

less outgroup contact → less representative contact → less variable exemplars → greater perceived outgroup homogeneity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

which social category does not follow Linville et all (1989) explanation for the outgroup homogeneity effect and why?

A

gender
we integrate with both genders equally so should have enough representative contact with both groups so shouldn’t show the effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how are stereotypes formed?

A

as a social construct, stereotypes are learnt from parents, peers, media etc
part of everyday language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what are the 2 social explanations for stereotype formation?

A

kernel of truth

stereotype content model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what is the cognitive explanation for stereotype formation?

A

illusory correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

this approach argues that some stereotypes may be based on actual differences between social groups. we have a tendency to exaggerate these differences and over extend them to all members of the group. this leads to the development of stereotypes.
what explanation is this?

A

kernel of truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what does the kernel of truth explanation not apply to?

A

personality traits (only applies to specific facts)

Terracciano et al. (2005) found no evidence of a ‘kernel of truth’ for personality stereotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what does the stereotype content model imply?

A

that stereotypes change as society changes

22
Q

what studies were linked to the stereotype content model?

A

Princeton trilogy studies and extensions → tracked stereotype change in Princeton students for 70 years

Katz & Braly (1933) → Madon et al (2001)
most ethnicity and nationality based stereotypes have changed

23
Q

what are the 2 key dimensions that stereotypes are classified by?
(stereotype content model)

A

warmth and competence

links the groups current status in society and potential for competition

24
Q

describe the table in the stereotype content model

A

low warmth + low competence → low status + competitive
low warmth + high competence → high status + competitive
high warmth + low competence → low status + not competitive
high warmth + high competence → high status + not competitive

warmth links to competitive
competence links to status

25
_________ is the explanation by Hamilton & Gifford (1976) that argued that when 2 statistically infrequent events (minority group and negative behaviour) are paired, the correlation between the 2 are overestimated due to their distinctiveness (false illusory correlation)
illusory correlation
26
describe how illusory correlation works
minority group perform negative behaviour → better encoding of that distinctive info → better recall → overestimation of relationship → formation of negative stereotype/prejudice
27
describe the study conducted by Hamilton & Gifford (1976) that finds evidence for the illusion correlation theory
ppts read statements describing behaviour of group A (majority) and group B (minority) statements sampled from real world group B has less statements than A due to being smaller group but same ratio of + to - behaviours (9:4) ppts presented with statements again and asked to indicate which behaviours were formed by which group prediction → group B → negative behaviours should be most distinctive → ppts should overestimate the number of - behaviours performed by group B
28
why do people stereotype?
stereotypes act as an energy saving device → simplifies info processing and reduces cognitive load stereotypes = judgement heuristics (mental shortcuts for social perception) stereotypes may serve as a justification function → system justification theory
29
describe the system justification theory (Jost & Banaji, 1994).
argues that people want to believe that social systems are fair and legitimate, so stereotypes help rationalise any inequality that exists. even the disadvantaged stereotype group justify their own stereotypes
30
describe a study that shows evidence for stereotypes reducing cognitive load/energy saving
Macrae et al (1994) dual task paradigm → divide cognitive resources between 2 tasks at once study 1: ppts given names and personality traits and asked to form impressions of people while listening to audio track. experimental condition = given category labels so could use stereotypes to form impressions e.g. John, skinhead, rebellious control condition = no category labels e.g. John, rebellious (if using stereotypes saves cognitive resources, ppts who are able to use stereotypes should remember more about the audio track) results: experimental condition performed better than control with higher no. of correct answers to audio tape Qs → saved resources
31
describe a study that shows evidence for stereotypes and the system justification theory
study looks at the impact of benevolent stereotypes male and female ppts control = exposed to no stereotypes experimental = exposed to benevolent (+) stereotypes → women as communal (warm, nurturing) → men as agentic (leadership, independent) (classic stereotypes of genders) and both types of stereotypes after exposure and priming to these stereotypes, ppts completed questionnaire assessing agreement with current gender relations and sex role divisions to see if stereotypes affect system justification results: → men showed no difference with no exposure and exposure to stereotypes → women showed a lower system justification with no exposure compared to exposure (supports theory)
32
why do stereotypes persist? give 3 explanations
→ biases in exposure to information → biases in interpretation of information → self fulfilling prophecy check notes for descriptions and evidence
33
what is the difference between stereotype activation and stereotype application?
activation = the degree to which a stereotype is accessible in the mind application = the actual use of activated stereotypes in judgements → forming an impression
34
how is stereotype application measured?
measures to assess whether someone uses stereotypes in judgments e.g. ask ppt to form impression of outgroup member → then asked to rate degree that member possesses certain stereotypic traits
35
how is stereotype activation measured?
lexical decision task reaction time, implicit task testing black word stimuli and how fast real words are noticed red category label stimuli facilities a faster response to the word
36
is social categorisation automatic? discuss for and against
yes → categorising people simplifies our complex social world and we do it so often for such key social categories (race, gender, age) that it becomes a habit and therefore automatic no → if it is meant to simplify our world we shouldn't do it when its not needed → should only occur when its consistent with our goals
37
describe evidence that social categorisation has goal dependent automaticity
research is widely accepted that categorisation isn't automatic across the board but is context dependent QUINN & MACRAE (2005) found people only categorised faces by gender when instructed (when it was their goal) → people just looked at faces did not automatically categorise
38
is stereotype activation automatic? | if social categorisation does occur, is stereotype activation an inevitable consequence?
widely agreed to be conditionally automatic ITO & TOMELLERI (2017) → ppts shown pics of black and white individuals → group 1 → asked to mentally categorise the face as black or white → group 2 → asked to mentally determine whether a small dot was present on each pic → then both groups asked to identify asap whether following pics were guns or insects results: → faster responses to gun pics following black primes vs. white primes → showed stereotype activation
39
stereotypes are more likely to be activated when?
→ we have sufficient cognitive resources → we are higher in prejudice → if activating them will help us maintain a positive sense of self
40
what are interventions to reduce stereotype activation?
exposure to counter-stereotypes by practice interventions women exposed to women leader biographies and women leaders in naturalistic settings (professors at uni)
41
________ is concern experienced by a person when there is the possibility that they may act in a way consistent with negative stereotypes
stereotype threat
42
how does stereotype threat affect our behaviour?
disruptive and intimidating → affects performance on tasks anxiety that the stereotype can give results in self fulfilling prophecies
43
describe Steele and Aronsons (1995 study) looking at how stereotype threat affected black ppts in a test of intellectual ability
black ppts performed worse than white ppts on a test when the test was presented as a measure of intellectual ability but... performed equally well when no reference was made that the test was to do with intellectual ability as no stereotype threat was activated so performance wasn't affected
44
describe Spencer, Steele & Quinn (1999) study about how stereotype affects gender differences
women performed worse than men on a maths test when told it reveals gender differences but performed equally well when told that it doesn't (assesses the stereotype that males are better at maths)
45
describe Koenig & Eagly (2005) study on stereotype threat
men performed worse on an interpersonal perception task when told it assesses social sensitivity (and men are worse than women) relative to when told it assesses complex information processing
46
describe Frantz et al (2004) study looking at white American psychology students and their stereotype threat as racists
implicit measures → IAT (implicit association test) → psychology students are aware of this ppts given different info about the IAT explicit threat group → told they are being assessed about their racial attitudes no threat group → told its a measure of cultural stereotype knowledge no info group results: higher IAT score indicates greater pro white implicit bias explicit threat group showed highest IAT score due to stereotype threat
47
apply knowledge of stereotype threat when looking at STEM
women and STEM: → less women in senior positions, under representation, leaky pipeline → increasing loss of women up the career ladder within STEM subjects both stereotype effects (hiring women in general) and stereotype threat contribute → can lead women to perform worse → less confidence to feeling like they could reach such a high career in STEM so don't apply
48
what are the other 2 effects of stereotype threat beyond pure performance?
disengagement from stereotyped domain and learning in the stereotyped domain
49
stereotype threat effects are reduced when...
...tests are reframed as a challenging learning experience ...anxiety is presented as helpful rather than harmful to performance (REFRAMING AND REAPPRAISAL) ...ppts are given the opportunity to list negative and positive attributes that describe their personal rather than social identity (DE-EMPHASIS OF THREATENED SOCIAL IDENTITY OR DOMAIN)
50
recognise and describe Miyake et al's (2010) empirical evaluation of a values affirmation intervention to reduce stereotype threat
women on physics course were found to be underperforming significantly to men introduced intervention to assess stereotype threat method: → men and women on physics course completed intervention twice a semester values affirmation group → choose most important value to you and write why its important to you control group → choose least important value to you and write why it is important to others results: → women performed significantly better when they had the opportunity to self affirm positive values → performed equally well to men → not significant to men → showed no difference after values affirmation because men aren't subject to stereotype threat in this domain