psychological research Flashcards
identify key points in the history of psychological science
earliest record was metaphysical/supernatural where human experiences and behaviour were attributed to nonphysical forces. ancient greeks only used logic and intuition. scholars over time became dissatisfied with the absence of evidence. mid-late 1800s Germany - started tackling q’s in cognitive P - initial resistance but now empirical evidence in all domains
why was there initial resistance to psychology as an empirical scientific field?
introducing science to assess human experience was seen as an insult to religion
what are the 4 key features of psychological science?
determinism, parsimony, systematic empiricalism, testability
describe determinism
assumptions are in order with no randomness or chaos. the events have systematic meaningful causes
describe parsimony
aims to have the simplest explanation
prefers simplicity over complexity
explanations and causes should not include unnecessary factors of processes
occam’s razor concept
describe systematic empiricism
a structured, organised approach to gathering data/observations in order to answer questions
what is testability?
when ideas should be confirmed or discomfirmed using available research techniques
what is falsifiability?
concept linked to testability. the openess of researchers to let their idea be disconfirmed (shown to be wrong)
what are the benefits of taking a scientific approach to studying psychological q’s?
enables systematic collection of empirical data that would be hard to obtain via intuition/logic/causal observation
provides evidence across multiple studies to support particular answers to a Q
builds valid evidence informed theory
can rule out answers that aren’t supported by evidence
can produce recommendations for policy and practiced based approaches
what are the 7 steps in the research process?
generate a research question, consult theory, state hypotheses, set up study, collect data, analyse data and interpret results, answer the research question
define theory
a general principle or set of principles that explain a phenomenon or event
what is a hypothesis?
a prediction to be tested in a research study
define a theoretical/conceptual framework
a set of principles presented in a systematic or structured way
describe the role theory plays in research processes
can be used to develop a new research question, some principles may only have a few supported studies so can be strengthened by replication
there may be competing explanations that require clarification
can be used to answer a research question
can refer to theory developed to explain other phenomena
results from research studies inform theory by (dis)confirming existing principles, adding new principles with new factors/processes
(theory is continually being updated depending on what research shows)
why is theory important to the research process?
theories offer systematic explanations for the causes and consequences of perceptions, beliefs, emotions, actions
(cant rely on intuition or popular beliefs)
theory provides a systematic recipe for doing empirical research - more structure
provides a rationale for development of research questions
theories inform recommendations for practice/application
explain why every research study needs a rationale
every study needs a rationale (justification) as an argument for why this study will make a novel contribution to existing knowledge. Conducting a study has many potential costs (money, time, resources) why should the study use these up?
In a world of limited time and resources, we need a good reason for conducting and reporting any research study
Reported research also becomes part of the literature of the topic
what is a rationale?
good enough reason for a research study to be carried out
what are the 3 types of rationales for conducting a research study?
new contributions to theory or conceptual understanding
new contributions to methodology
new contributions to practice
describe different types of novel contributions to research
the first test of a new principle, testing competing explanations, replicating a result that hasn’t been widely tested, extension of research
what are the 2 different types of research questions?
differences between groups
relationship between variables
what are the 3 different types of hypotheses that can be generated from a research question?
null hypothesis
experimental/alternative
directional
what is the difference between systematic and unsystematic variation?
systematic = variation due to the effect that is being investigated unsystematic = variation due to other reasons than the effect being investigated
give examples of unsystematic variation
individual differences, context, mood, different researchers, characteristics of study
what is the aim of research?
to investigate how much of the overall variation in a study is systematic or unsystematic
explain the aim and logic of null hypothesis testing
there will never be systematic variation only
always be unsystematic variation (variation due to other effects)
unsystematic V only = null = no effect (all due to other reasons)
systematic and unsystematic = experimental
we focus on null hypothesis because its the simplest to investigate
if we are right about the H1 we need to discredit the opposing H0 of no systematic effect
testing H0 emphasises disconfirmation/falsifiability
if we find no evidence for H0 then we can conclude that there is support for H1
what is probability?
chance of an event occurring ranging from 0-1
explain how probability fits into the logic of null hypothesis testing
can never be 100% certain that the decision to discredit ‘unsystematic variation only’ is the correct one as we can never confirm with absolute certainty, so we use probability to evaluate the extent to which we may be right to discredit the null hypothesis and prove there is an effect to the research question
define population
set of individuals with the particular characteristic(s) under investigation in a research Q
define samples
selection of some individuals from the population to take part in a study
used to estimate what happens in a population
explain why samples are needed
don’t have access, time, resources, not all population will want to participate
solution = sample to represent the larger population
explain the role of populations and samples in hypothesis tests
researchers use samples to test hypotheses about what is happening in the population
what is sampling error?
likely discrepancy (difference) between the results found in a particular sample and the results that would of been obtained from the population captures extent to which a sample is representative of population
what 2 factors influence sampling error?
sample size
sample strategy
high level of representativeness =
low level of representativeness =
low sampling error
high sampling error
why is a random sample better?
lower sampling error
less chance of any systematic bias in strategy
what are the 3 different types of sampling strategies?
random - random selection from whole population
stratified - random selection from sub groups
opportunity - advertised, self selected sample
the pro of random and stratified sampling is that it is likely to produce a representative sample. what are the cons of these 2 sampling methods?
higher costs
need lots of info about participants and subgroups
may need incentives for people to participate
define categorical and continuous variables
categorical:
- each individual assigned to a group/category
- no numerical value/meaning
continuous:
- scores can be ordered on a continuum from low to high
- numerical value/meaning
differentiate between within participants and between participants designs
within = every participant is in every condition of the study so each condition has the same group of participants so each participant produces a DV score in every condition
(repeated measures design)
between = each participant is in 1 condition of the study so each condition has a distinct group of Ps so each P provides a DV score in 1 condition
(independent measures design)
what are the 2 different types of experiments conducted from a between participants design?
true experiment and quasi experiment
differentiate between a true and quasi experiment (the different ways participants are allocated to a condition)
true = random assignment of individuals to groups/conditions (equal chance)
quasi = non random assignment of individuals (makes use of pre-existing groups)
what are the pros and cons of within participants design
pros:
can use smaller sample
no ethical issues around assignment to condition
less chance of individual differences between conditions
cons:
more likely to guess aim
order effects - repetition, practice, interference (can address these effects by counterbalancing)
what are the pros and cons of between participants design
pros: less likely to guess aim no order effects cons: need larger sample potential ethical issue if assigned to 1 condition may be individual differences
what is counterbalancing?
systematically varying the order in which participants complete the conditions in a within-ps design
(typically via random allocation to different orders)
what are the pros of a true experiment?
pros:
random = reduces unintended individual differences between conditions/groups
cons:
random assignment may not be possible as participants may already belong to a group being studied, may be ethical issues, practical constraints
what are the pros and cons of a quasi experiment?
pros:
can be used in contexts where random assignment is not possible
cons:
non random = potential unintended individual differences as people in pre existing groups may share other characteristics that may explain differences found
what types of studies are used to investigate relationships between variables?
categorical study and correlational study