psychological research Flashcards

1
Q

identify key points in the history of psychological science

A

earliest record was metaphysical/supernatural where human experiences and behaviour were attributed to nonphysical forces. ancient greeks only used logic and intuition. scholars over time became dissatisfied with the absence of evidence. mid-late 1800s Germany - started tackling q’s in cognitive P - initial resistance but now empirical evidence in all domains

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

why was there initial resistance to psychology as an empirical scientific field?

A

introducing science to assess human experience was seen as an insult to religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the 4 key features of psychological science?

A

determinism, parsimony, systematic empiricalism, testability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

describe determinism

A

assumptions are in order with no randomness or chaos. the events have systematic meaningful causes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

describe parsimony

A

aims to have the simplest explanation
prefers simplicity over complexity
explanations and causes should not include unnecessary factors of processes
occam’s razor concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

describe systematic empiricism

A

a structured, organised approach to gathering data/observations in order to answer questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is testability?

A

when ideas should be confirmed or discomfirmed using available research techniques

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is falsifiability?

A

concept linked to testability. the openess of researchers to let their idea be disconfirmed (shown to be wrong)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the benefits of taking a scientific approach to studying psychological q’s?

A

enables systematic collection of empirical data that would be hard to obtain via intuition/logic/causal observation

provides evidence across multiple studies to support particular answers to a Q

builds valid evidence informed theory

can rule out answers that aren’t supported by evidence

can produce recommendations for policy and practiced based approaches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the 7 steps in the research process?

A

generate a research question, consult theory, state hypotheses, set up study, collect data, analyse data and interpret results, answer the research question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

define theory

A

a general principle or set of principles that explain a phenomenon or event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is a hypothesis?

A

a prediction to be tested in a research study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

define a theoretical/conceptual framework

A

a set of principles presented in a systematic or structured way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

describe the role theory plays in research processes

A

can be used to develop a new research question, some principles may only have a few supported studies so can be strengthened by replication

there may be competing explanations that require clarification

can be used to answer a research question

can refer to theory developed to explain other phenomena

results from research studies inform theory by (dis)confirming existing principles, adding new principles with new factors/processes
(theory is continually being updated depending on what research shows)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why is theory important to the research process?

A

theories offer systematic explanations for the causes and consequences of perceptions, beliefs, emotions, actions
(cant rely on intuition or popular beliefs)
theory provides a systematic recipe for doing empirical research - more structure
provides a rationale for development of research questions
theories inform recommendations for practice/application

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

explain why every research study needs a rationale

A

every study needs a rationale (justification) as an argument for why this study will make a novel contribution to existing knowledge. Conducting a study has many potential costs (money, time, resources) why should the study use these up?
In a world of limited time and resources, we need a good reason for conducting and reporting any research study
Reported research also becomes part of the literature of the topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is a rationale?

A

good enough reason for a research study to be carried out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what are the 3 types of rationales for conducting a research study?

A

new contributions to theory or conceptual understanding
new contributions to methodology
new contributions to practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

describe different types of novel contributions to research

A

the first test of a new principle, testing competing explanations, replicating a result that hasn’t been widely tested, extension of research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what are the 2 different types of research questions?

A

differences between groups

relationship between variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what are the 3 different types of hypotheses that can be generated from a research question?

A

null hypothesis
experimental/alternative
directional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what is the difference between systematic and unsystematic variation?

A
systematic = variation due to the effect that is being investigated
unsystematic = variation due to other reasons than the effect being investigated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

give examples of unsystematic variation

A

individual differences, context, mood, different researchers, characteristics of study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what is the aim of research?

A

to investigate how much of the overall variation in a study is systematic or unsystematic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
explain the aim and logic of null hypothesis testing
there will never be systematic variation only always be unsystematic variation (variation due to other effects) unsystematic V only = null = no effect (all due to other reasons) systematic and unsystematic = experimental we focus on null hypothesis because its the simplest to investigate if we are right about the H1 we need to discredit the opposing H0 of no systematic effect testing H0 emphasises disconfirmation/falsifiability if we find no evidence for H0 then we can conclude that there is support for H1
26
what is probability?
chance of an event occurring ranging from 0-1
27
explain how probability fits into the logic of null hypothesis testing
can never be 100% certain that the decision to discredit 'unsystematic variation only' is the correct one as we can never confirm with absolute certainty, so we use probability to evaluate the extent to which we may be right to discredit the null hypothesis and prove there is an effect to the research question
28
define population
set of individuals with the particular characteristic(s) under investigation in a research Q
29
define samples
selection of some individuals from the population to take part in a study used to estimate what happens in a population
30
explain why samples are needed
don't have access, time, resources, not all population will want to participate solution = sample to represent the larger population
31
explain the role of populations and samples in hypothesis tests
researchers use samples to test hypotheses about what is happening in the population
32
what is sampling error?
``` likely discrepancy (difference) between the results found in a particular sample and the results that would of been obtained from the population captures extent to which a sample is representative of population ```
33
what 2 factors influence sampling error?
sample size | sample strategy
34
high level of representativeness = | low level of representativeness =
low sampling error | high sampling error
35
why is a random sample better?
lower sampling error | less chance of any systematic bias in strategy
36
what are the 3 different types of sampling strategies?
random - random selection from whole population stratified - random selection from sub groups opportunity - advertised, self selected sample
37
the pro of random and stratified sampling is that it is likely to produce a representative sample. what are the cons of these 2 sampling methods?
higher costs need lots of info about participants and subgroups may need incentives for people to participate
38
define categorical and continuous variables
categorical: - each individual assigned to a group/category - no numerical value/meaning continuous: - scores can be ordered on a continuum from low to high - numerical value/meaning
39
differentiate between within participants and between participants designs
within = every participant is in every condition of the study so each condition has the same group of participants so each participant produces a DV score in every condition (repeated measures design) between = each participant is in 1 condition of the study so each condition has a distinct group of Ps so each P provides a DV score in 1 condition (independent measures design)
40
what are the 2 different types of experiments conducted from a between participants design?
true experiment and quasi experiment
41
differentiate between a true and quasi experiment (the different ways participants are allocated to a condition)
true = random assignment of individuals to groups/conditions (equal chance) quasi = non random assignment of individuals (makes use of pre-existing groups)
42
what are the pros and cons of within participants design
pros: can use smaller sample no ethical issues around assignment to condition less chance of individual differences between conditions cons: more likely to guess aim order effects - repetition, practice, interference (can address these effects by counterbalancing)
43
what are the pros and cons of between participants design
``` pros: less likely to guess aim no order effects cons: need larger sample potential ethical issue if assigned to 1 condition may be individual differences ```
44
what is counterbalancing?
systematically varying the order in which participants complete the conditions in a within-ps design (typically via random allocation to different orders)
45
what are the pros of a true experiment?
pros: random = reduces unintended individual differences between conditions/groups cons: random assignment may not be possible as participants may already belong to a group being studied, may be ethical issues, practical constraints
46
what are the pros and cons of a quasi experiment?
pros: can be used in contexts where random assignment is not possible cons: non random = potential unintended individual differences as people in pre existing groups may share other characteristics that may explain differences found
47
what types of studies are used to investigate relationships between variables?
categorical study and correlational study
48
differentiate the two different studies that can be chosen when looking at approaches to time
cross sectional = single point in time | correlational = over a period of time
49
what are the 5 types of measures used in research studies
self report, implicit, biological, test/task performance, behaviour
50
what is the ideal for choosing an appropriate measure in a research study?
high alignment of measure with variable (direct links between measure and variable being assessed) low demand characteristics low level of bias
51
high potential for bias when choosing a measure is caused by?
socially desirable responses | wanting to help the researcher
52
demand characteristics of a measure are high when?
participants can guess the aim/purpose of measure | responses to measure are under conscious control and made deliberately e.g. self report
53
what are the 3 most common research settings used in studies?
``` FIELD STUDIES (some control, real world natural environment) LAB STUDIES (full control, artificial context) ONLINE/MAIL STUDIES (no control, self report, questionnaires) ```
54
what 2 things are important when choosing an appropriate research setting?
high internal validity | high external validity
55
what is the difference between internal and external validity?
``` external = study provides a valid accurate representation of the real world phenomenon internal = study provides a valid accurate answer to the research Q ```
56
when is internal validity higher in a research setting?
when the researcher has more control over the setting as it reduces sources of variation
57
describe the historical context in which research ethics have been developed
1800s-early 1900s - research focused on science and the best most rigorous methods little consideration given to participant experience and feelings nazi scientists forced prisoners in jails/conc. camps to partake suffered extreme physical and psychological harm this brought participant experience to attention Nuremberg code developed after WW2 code created to protect all humans who participate in medical and scientific research inspired modern ethical principles
58
what are research ethics?
use and application of moral principles and practice in the context of research using (human) participants consideration of risks vs benefits
59
what are the possible risks of conducting research?
physical and psychological harm to ppts, wasting ppts time for no substantive purpose, misinterpretation/misuse of research outcomes
60
what are the possible benefits of conducting research?
``` academic impact (scientific knowledge to build theory) real world impact (insights to improve practice) personal benefit (insights into self and world) ```
61
list the 4 general principles of the BPS code of research ethics
respect for autonomy, privacy, dignity of individuals and communities maximising benefits and minimising harm scientific integrity social responsibility
62
what are the 8 specific ethical considerations in psychology research?
``` informed consent freedom from coercion confidentiality anonymity debriefing minimise risk of harm contribute knowledge and insights avoid misuse/misinterpretation of results ```
63
what 5 specific considerations come under the autonomy, privacy and dignity principle?
informed consent, freedom from coercion, confidentiality, anonymity, debriefing
64
what specific consideration is linked with the scientific integrity principle?
contribute knowledge and insights
65
what specific consideration is linked with the social responsibility principle?
avoid misuse/misinterpretation of results
66
freedom from coercion =
no persuasion using threats or force | individuals are free to decide to not participate, withdraw, leave any task/Q unanswered
67
confidentiality =
maintenance of a participants privacy
68
anonymity =
can't identify individuals from their responses
69
what is the difference between active and passive deception?
passive = withholding the full truth or key pieces of relevant info e.g. not mentioning specific variables being measured or describing the full aim of the study active = intentionally misinforming participants about the true state of affairs in a study e.g. using confederates, altering test scores to low even if ppt did well to see reaction
70
what are the ethical problems with deception?
violates principle of fully informed consent, participants may experience negative harmful responses, participants may leave the study with misleading info even after being told it was false, participants may mistrust researchers
71
explain why deception is still used in psychology
want to study honest real responses to real world events, telling participants the precise aims/hypotheses/variables could influence their responses, therefore passive deception helps minimise demand characteristics may not be possible to recreate a real world event while telling the full truth
72
why are the benefits of active deception?
helps maximise experimental realism (extent to which a study engages ppts attention so it feels like a genuine activity/experience to them) helps maximise researcher control (holds everything constant except the variables of interest)
73
which is more acceptable, active or passive deception?
passive
74
how should deception be used in psychology studies?
only use either type of deception if necessary weigh up the risks vs benefits always carefully debrief participants
75
explain why we need to quantify variation and how descriptive stats helps
aim of research = investigate how much of variation is systematic and unsystematic to differentiate between these 2 types we need to quantify them (else not valid or accurate) calculations used to quantify are based on info about the scores in the sample
76
what are the 2 types of descriptive statistics?
measures of central tendency | measures of dispersion
77
what is the point of central tendency (in a set of scores)?
the score that is the most representative or typical
78
why is the point of central tendency useful? give 2 reasons
simple description that offers a best guess about the most likely score in a sample and is an essential component of calculating some measures of dispersion
79
what are the 3 measures of central tendency?
mean, median, mode
80
what measures of central tendency are appropriate for continuous measures?
mean and median
81
what measures of central tendency are appropriate for categorical measures?
mode
82
with continuous measures when is it more appropriate to use mean or median?
mean is used more frequently because it offers more info than median and reflects the actual value of all the scores median is better to use when there are outliers in the set
83
define the concept of dispersion
dispersion = distribution of scores | allows us to quantify the variation found in a set of scores
84
what are the 3 measures of dispersion?
range, variance, standard deviation
85
define variance
the spread of scores around the mean as a point of reference
86
describe how you calculate the variance
1) calculate mean 2) calculate difference of each score from the mean 3) square these deviance values to get + no.s 4) add up all squared numbers (total sum of deviance) 5) divide sum by number of scores - 1
87
what is wrong with calculating just the variance?
not in standard measurement units so need to square root the value to find out the standard deviation
88
what is the definition of standard deviation?
the spread of scores around the mean as a point of reference, IN STANDARD MEASUREMENT UNITS
89
symmetrical, bell shaped curve, mean roughly in middle, scores mostly clustered around the mean. what type of distribution is this?
normal distribution
90
skewed to the right, mean slightly to right of curve, bulk of scores at lower end. what type of distribution is this?
positively skewed distribution
91
skewed to the left, mean slightly to left of curve, bulk of scores at higher end. what type of distribution is this?
negatively skewed distribution
92
explain the 68 - 95 - 99.7 rule
``` 68% = all scores lie within 1SD of the mean 95% = all scores lie within 2SDs of the mean 99.7% = all scores lie within 3SDs of the mean ``` increasing the number of SDs increases the range of scores included nearly all scores in a set will lie within 3SDs of the mean
93
explain the formula used to predict peoples scores in the population
just need to know the mean and SD formula = mean (+ or -) 1/2/3 SDs a higher % score of 99.7% has a larger range than 68% score showing distribution
94
95% confidence =
1.96 SDs | represents 95% of scores as a standardised value
95
what is the confidence interval formula?
mean +/- 1.96 x SD/square root (n)
96
why is the confidence interval calculated?
to identify the range of scores that is likely to include the true population mean
97
explain why increases in sample size reduce the size of confidence intervals
smaller interval = fewer scores in possible range = more precise estimate of population mean
98
why does a larger sample size give us a more precise estimate?
reduces sampling error and therefore reduces the discrepancy between the sample and the population
99
define certainty
level of confidence that the true population mean lies within the range estimated from the sample
100
95% confidence = __% uncertainty
5 | 5% uncertainty that the mean lies within the interval
101
higher level of confidence = | smaller interval size =
more certainty | more precise estimate
102
researchers ideally want what 2 things when looking at confidence intervals?
``` high certainty (high confidence interval) high precision (smaller interval sizes) ``` but difficult to have both at same time so solution is a trade off between certainty and precision trade off = 95% confidence interval
103
why is the 95% confidence interval a good compromise?
represents an acceptable middle ground of reasonably good certainty and reasonably good precision
104
explain how researchers come to make decision errors when testing the null hypothesis
samples can offer imperfect estimates of the characteristics due to sampling error and unsystematic variation if sample statistics don't match the real population parameters, researchers will make a decision error when making inferences about the population based on the results from the study so... the decision to accept or reject the null hypothesis could be wrong
105
a researcher finds an effect in the sample, when no effect actually exists in the population. what type of error is this?
type 1 error
106
a researcher finds no effect in the sample, when an effect does actually exist in the population. what type of error is this?
type 2 error
107
false positive =
type 1 error | we think there is an effect when there actually isn't
108
false negative =
type 2 error | we think there is no effect when there actually is
109
if a researcher makes a type 1 error do they accept or reject the null hypothesis?
reject | make the wrong decision
110
if a researcher makes a type 2 error do they accept or reject the null hypothesis?
accept | make the wrong decision
111
explain possible reasons for type 1 errors
sampling error bias in participants responses effect occurred randomly/by chance
112
explain possible reasons for type 2 errors
sampling error | unsystematic variation
113
explain sampling error as a reason for type 1 and type 2 errors
type 1: effect is not present in overall population but individuals who do show the effect are over-represented in the sample type 2: effect is present in overall population but individuals who don't show the effect are over represented in the sample
114
incorrectly reject the null hypothesis = | incorrectly accept the null hypothesis =
type 1 error | type 2 error
115
define p value
probability of finding an effect in a sample if there is no effect in the population (probability of making a type 1 error) (probability of incorrectly finding an effect in a study)
116
what is the p value range?
0-1 | 0 = certainly won't occur, 1 = certainly will occur
117
explain why p values can never be exactly 0 or 1
because we can never be 100% certain about our inferences
118
what does a small p value mean?
low probability of having made a type 1 error
119
if the p value is small, do researchers accept or reject the null hypothesis?
reject | because unlikely that a type 1 error (effect in sample but not in population) has been made