Social Psychology Conformity Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

social facilitation

EX involving sports

A

if youre really good @ something or it’s an easy task, youll perform BETTER in front of a group
-do better @ task when others are around
EX) running track, home field advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Social impairment

EX involving driving

A

if it’s a difficult task or you’re not very good @ it, you’ll perform WORSE in front of a group
EX) okay 2 driving, father-in-law in car -> went E not W

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

social loafing

EX involving sports

A

tendency for ppl in a group to exert less effort when pooling efforts toward a common goal then if they were individually accountable
-less effort when there’s more ppl
EX) Airplane making lexi & lauren vs class
football less individual effort bc team

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

conformity, is it always a bad thing?

A

not always a bad thing, group safe -> do same thing and youre safe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

conformity

ex? is behavior contagious? ex?

A

adjusting one’s behavior or thinking to coincide w/ a group standard
EX: smoking individual but part of a group
tattoos individual but part of a mainstream
military - head shaved and uniform -> group efforts
BEHAVIOR IS CONTAGIOUS! -suicides happen in clumps, clapping, standing ovation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Asch’s Study of Conformity

A
LINE STUDY
1955
1% individual error, 33% in a group error
about 1/3 of participants conformed
70% conformed atleast once
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

To strengthen conformity (4)

A

group is unanimous
group is at least 3 ppl (smoking, every does-> more likely)
admires the group’s status (mean girls, cut shirt -> conform)
one had made no prior commitment (tues. to meet -> ok tuesday bc no prior commitment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Normative social influence

3 examples

A

resulting from one’s desire to GAIN APPROVAL

  • Marco Lokar of seton hall (1991) Italian
    • everyone wearing flag, didnt received threats -> left
  • toni smith (2003) manhattan
    • turned back against flag -> threats

(ex: change way you dress around grandparents)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

informational social influence

A

resulting from one’s willingness to accept others opinions about reality
-accept other ppls beliefs, dont scream in church
(clueless, look at others for what to do)
EX) elevator facing forward not back
-Rebecca denton (2004)- great britain
-wrong side of road, thought everyone else was wrong
-western nations are more individual vs East asian who conform and take part in informational influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Milgrams study of obedience

participants? what affected the study?

A

men ages 20-50
women, just as likely to obey
Authority had to be close
prestigious institution
victim depersonalized (buffer btwn each person)
no role models for defiance (obey when no one else says no)
majority of ppl went to top 450 volts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what did we learn from milgram?

A

ordinary ppl can do shocking things

-ethical issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

other events similar to milgrams findings?

A

jozefow poland (1942)
-15/500 stood up and refused to kill ppl in village
Le Chambon France (WW2)
-Christian community sheltered ppl bc they defied early

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

obedience

A

power of ppl in positions of authority -> influences ppls attitudes and behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

why do ppl obey?

A

socialization
foot in door effect
confusion about attitudes
buffers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

socialization (dealing with obedience)

A

socialized to obey authority figures from childhood and doing otherwise conflicts w/ deeply held attitudes about correct behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

confusion about attitudes

A

ppl who are aware of attitudes -> more likely to act in accordance to them
-disturbed by whats around them -> less aware & mroe confused about beliefs

17
Q

buffers

A

protected from observing consequences of their actions -> more likely to follow orders
EX: Wall, mroe likely to comply and hurt learner

18
Q

group polarization

A

groups tend to make more extreme decisions then the individual
EX Ti-pi
2 high school freshman -1 band other basketball, split about bc participate more
(POLAR OPPOSITES, PULL AWAY)
KKK easier to join w/ internet bc similar beliefs
High prejudice -> among others w/ same belief-> mroe prejudice

19
Q

Positives of group polarization examples?

A

spiritual awareness- worship in groups-> belief become strong
self-help- believes should quit -> held accountable by group
tolerance

20
Q

Henry and Roger (dealing w/ group polarization

A

Henry- 6.12 -> 4.88, demonstrates risky shift (not much to lose so more risk)
Roger 6.84 -> 7.82, demonstrates conservative shirt (a lot to lose so less risk)

21
Q

Groupthink

A

Group members suppress their reservations about the ideas supported by the group
more concerned w/ group harmony
EX) Everyone wants to see 1 movie, you want to see another but dont say anything

22
Q

when is groupthink worse?

A

worse in highly cohesive groups (less likely to speak up)
EX) Bay of Pigs- “great idea” outweighed opposed ppl didnt speak loud enough (like asch line study, didnt speak up)
-fed by overconfidence, conformity, and group polarization
WANT DIVERSE GROUP OF PPL WHEN LEADER TO AVOID GROUPTHINK

23
Q

Deindividuation

A

ppl get swept up in a group & lose sense of self

  • feel anonymous & aroused
  • explains rioting behaviors
  • Zimbardo (1970), uniforms, # used in prison study which takes away individual and replaces them w/ group or uniform
24
Q

Zimbardo prison study

showed?

A

showed how we deindividuate & become the roles we are given
-Abu Ghraib (2004) zimbardo brought in to say situation & not disposition