Social influence Flashcards

1
Q

what is conformity

A

when we change our behaviour to be the same as a majority group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is compliance

A

A public change of beliefs and behaviours, which only lasts in the presence of the majority group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is compliance usually caused by

A

A desire to fit in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is internalisation

A

Both public and private change of beliefs and behaviours, where we are persuaded to take on the views of the majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is internalisation usually caused by

A

A fear of being wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is identification

A

changing behaviour to fit in or belong to a specific social group, both public and private

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

is identification permanent or temporary

A

temporary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

is internalisation permanent or temporary

A

permanent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is normative social influence

A

When we conform due to not wanting to be rejected by the majority group, it is an emotional process as we have a strong need to be liked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what mainly causes normative social influence

A

peer pressure or with strangers so we dont get ridiculed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is informational social influence

A

We conform due to being unsure of what the correct information is, and we conclude the majority must have the correct information, its a cognitive process as we have a need to to right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what mainly causes informative social influence

A

when we need to decide quickly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a confederate

A

Fake ppts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the aim of Asch’s study

A

To see if people conform in unambiguous situations when in a group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was Asch’s method

A

Took a sample of 123 male American ppts in groups of 6-9 people (one real ppts while the others were confederates), 12 critical out of 18 trials, control group of 36 people completed 20 trials individually with less than 1% mistakes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were Asch’s findings

A

75% conformed at least once
25% never conformed
5%conformed in all 12 critical trials
Overall conformity was 37% in critical trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What were Asch’s conclusions

A

He found 3 reasons people confirmed to be:
Distortion of perception- ppts came to see lines in same way as majority
Distortion of judgment- unsure or doubtful of own judgment
Distortion of action- ppts thought differently privately but changed their public answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What were 3 variations in Asch’s study and how they affected results

A

Task difficulty- when task was harder he found more people conformed
Group size- under pressure of majority of 3 conformity increased to 33%
Unanimity of majority- if one confederate was instructed to give the right answer conformity decreased to 5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what is the aim of Zimbardos study

A

to examine whether people would conform to social roles of a prison guard or prisoner when placed in a mock prison, and whether behaviour in prisons was due to internal dispositional factors or external situational factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what was Zimbardo’s method

A

21 male university students selected from 75 volunteers, based on their physical and mental stability and were paid $15 a day, each ppts was randomly assigned either prisoner or guard, prisoners were arrested in their homes, fingerprinted, striped and given a numbered smock to wear, the guards were given uniforms, dark reflective sunglasses and handcuffs, they were not allowed physical violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what were the results of Zimbardo’s study

A

both sets of ppts quickly identified with their social roles; prisoners rebelled, while guards became increasingly more abusive, prisoners would be woken at night and forced to clean toilets with their bare hands, 5 prisoners were released early because of their adverse reactions e.g. crying and extreme anxiety, the study was terminated after 6 days instead of the 2 weeks planned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what were Zimbardo’s conclusions

A

people are quick to conform to social roles, even when it goes against their moral principles, he concluded that situational factors were largely responsible for the behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are some differences between conformity and obedience

A

Conformity can be between people of equal status, whereas obedience occurs within a hierarchy and has an emphasis on power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Why did milgram carry out his study

A

He was interested in why the German population had followed orders from the dictator Hitler

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Explain milgrams procedure

A

He used 40 male ppts at a time, who were told that the study was about now punishment effects learning.
He nad 2 confederates, one who acted as experimentor, and another who was used as a fake ppts.
The confederate was always the learner when roles were drawn from rigged Iots, the teacher (real ppts) nad to test the learners ability to remember word pairs.
Every time he gave a wrong answer the learner was given a ‘shock’.
These went from 15 to 450 volts by 15 volt increments, once they reached 300 volts the learner would pound on the wall.
The experimenter had a series of verbal probes such as “you have no entice you must go on” to say it the teacher asked to stop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What were milgrams findings

A

65% of ppts went all the way to 450 volts.
No one stopped before 300volts.
They au moused signs of distress, sweating, laughing and fidgeting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What was milgrams conclusion

A

Most people would obey an authority figure even if it goes against their moral code

28
Q

What was milgrams aim

A

To find whether ordinary people would obey an unjust order

29
Q

What were the 3 changes to proximity in the variations or milgrams study

A

Proximity of the victim, proximity of authority, and touch proximity

30
Q

Explain proximity of the victim with change in obedience and why

A

Teacher and learner in the same room, obedience dropped to 40%, teacher could experience the pain being inflicted on learner directly

31
Q

Explain proximity of authority with the change in obedience and why

A

Experimenter was not in room so gave directions via telephone, obedience never dropped to 21%, no authority figure present so easier to disobey

32
Q

Explain touch proximity with the change in obedience and why

A

Teachers had to force learners hand onto the place to relieve electric shock, obidencelient down to 30%, there was more pressure so felt more responsible

33
Q

Explain change in location as a variation of milgrams study

A

Moved from prestigious Yale university to rundown office, obedience went down to 48%, less prestigious verve so prehaps more authority

34
Q

Explain the uniform variation of milligrams study (not now obedience changed)

A

A female researcher stopped people in the street and asks them for change so someone can renew their parking ticket, dressed in either police uniform, business wear or as a beggar,

35
Q

How did obedience change in the uniform variation or milgrams study

A

Police- 72% obeyed
Business - 48%
Beggar - 52%

36
Q

What are the two social psychological explanations of obedience

A

Agentic state and legitimacy theory

37
Q

Explain the agentic state and now its un explanation of obedience

A

When we act as the agent of someone we find it easy to deny personal responsibility, individuals move from the autonomous state (when we direct our own behaviour) to the agentic state (passing responsibility to another of higher status)

38
Q

What and how causes people to feel ‘stuck’ in the agentic state

A

Blinding factors: aspects of a situation that allow a person to minimise the damaging effects

39
Q

What is the shift between the two states called

A

Agentic shift

40
Q

Explain legitimacy of authority as an explanation for obedience

A

Suggest that we are more likely to obey people who we perceive to have legitimate authority

41
Q

What are the 3 key criteria psychologists found we use to assess the legitimacy of authority

A

Legitimacy of the system, legitimacy of authority within the system, legitimacy of demands or orders given

42
Q

Explain key traits of the authoritarian personality

A
  • Highly obedient to authority
  • submissive to people of higher standards
  • dismissive of those seen to be inferior
43
Q

Explain Adorno’s procedure

A

Measured 2000 middle class white Americans and their unioncious attitudes towards other racial groups
The F scale was used to measure whether someone had an authoritarian personality

44
Q

What is fascism

A

Intolerance to those of other races

45
Q

What were Adorno’s findings

A

Authoritarian personalities:
- identify with the Strong
- were aware of their own social status
- showed extreme respect to those of a higher status
- patronise those of lower status
- driven by stereotypes and prejudice

46
Q

Explain now those with the authoritarian personality can become excessively respectful of authority figures

A

As a child they will have a harsh upbringing with little love and a lot of punishment from authoritarian parents, this creates a fear of their parents which results in being excessively respect of authority figures

47
Q

Explain now elms and milgrams study supports Adornos findings

A

They gave 20 of milgrams participants who went all the way, the F scale test as well as 20 who didn’t fully obey
Those who had obeyed scored highly

48
Q

What are the two ways we resist social influence

A

Social support and locus of control

49
Q

Explain social support

A

The presence of people who resist pressures to conform or obey help others do the same by acting as models and allowing diffusion of responsibility

50
Q

Explain now social support effectively effects conformity

A

Is reduced by a dissenting peer as they reduce peer pressure from majority group

51
Q

How did social support affect asch’s study

A

Conformity dropped to 5% in unanimity variation

52
Q

How does social support effect obedience

A

Dissenters disobedience frees the participants to act from their own conscience

53
Q

How did social support affect milgrams Judy

A

Obedience dropped to 10%

54
Q

Explain locus of control

A

Disposition explanation, revering to the sense we have about what directs the events in our lives

55
Q

What is internal loc

A

They believe they are mostly responsible for what happens to them

56
Q

What is external loc

A

They believe that things happen without their own control

57
Q

Why are people with internal IOC more likely to obey

A

If some one takes personal responsibility for their actions and experiences they are more likely to base their decisions on their own beliefs

58
Q

What is minority influence

A

A form of social influence in which a minority persuade others to adopt their beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours

59
Q

Explain consistency in minority influence

A

Minority sharing the same view over time causing the majority to re think their views

60
Q

What is synchronic consistency

A

Between two people in the minority

61
Q

What is diachronic consistency

A

Consistency over time

62
Q

Explain commitment in minority influence

A

Showing through their actions how much their view/belief matters to them, sometimes engaging in extreme activities to draw attention to their view (augmentation principle)

63
Q

Explain flexibility in minority influence

A

It’s essential for a minority to win over a majority group, it’s the ability to compromise and not be too rigid in their views, it’s important as the minority is not in a position of power, however can’t be too flexible as they won’t be taken seriously

64
Q

Explain Moscovici procedure

A

172 ppts were tested to ensure they weren’t colour blind, in groups of 6 including two confederates they were asked to state the couloir of 36 slides all different stages of blue
Condition A confederates were consistent- said all were green
Condition B confederates were inconsistent- said 12 slides were green

65
Q

What were Moscovici findings

A

Control group- only called 0.25% green
Consistent group- answered green on 8.42% of trials
Inconsistent group- answered green in 1.25% of trials