Social Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define conformity.

A

A change in behaviour due to real or imagined pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is compliance?

A

Changing behaviour in public but not changing private beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is identification?

A

Changing our behaviour to be fit a group we identify with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is internalisation?

A

A private and public acceptance of group norms (long term)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is informational social influence?

A

Want to be right.
When we conform to the opinion of others because we believe they have superior knowledge and are more likely to be right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is normative social influence?

A

Want to be liked.
When we conform because we want to be liked and accepted by others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Name 3 features of informational social influence.

A

Most likely in new/ambiguous situations.
Cognitive process.
Leads to internalisation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Name 3 features of normative social influence.

A

To gain social approval.
Emotional process (avoid emotions e.g. embarrassment)
Leads to compliance and identification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain one strength of normative social influence.

A

Supporting research evidence.
When Asch asked participants to write down an answer instead of say it out loud, conformity decreased.
When answering in private NSI is reduced as there is less pressure to fit in, which is what NSI predicts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain one weakness of normative social influence as an explanation for conformity.

A

Individual differences in how people respond to NSI.
People known as Naffiliators have a greater need for social approval than others and therefore are more likely to conform.
NSI does not affect everyone in the same way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain one strength of informational social influence as an explanation for conformity.

A

Supporting research evidence.
As Asch made the task more difficult conformity increased as participants did not want to be wrong.
Shows people are more likely to look to others when unsure, which is what ISI predicts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evaluate informational social influence and normative social influence.

A

They work together.
During Covid we wore masks to avoid social disapproval (NSI) but also we believed the professionals about reducing transmission (ISI).
In some cases the best explanation is both.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was Asch’s aim?

A

To investigate whether people conformed to a majority view when it is obviously incorrect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was Asch’s method?

A

123 American male college students.
Shown 2 cards, one with test line and other with 3 comparison lines.
Asked which of the 3 comparison lines was the same as the test line.
Correct answer always obvious.
All people in the room were confederates except the one participant.
Confederates gave wrong answers in 12 out of 18 trials.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the results of Asch’s study?

A

75% of participants conformed at least once.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the conclusion from Asch’s study?

A

People would conform to a majority view even when it is obvious that it is incorrect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain one weakness of Asch’s study.

A

Used a limited sample.
Only used American male college students.
Cannot generalise findings to explain conformity in other genders/ages/cultures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Explain one strength of Asch’s study.

A

Lab study so have control over variables.
Could alter specific variables such as group size/task difficulty to see how conformity is affected.
Therefore helping to identify social factors affecting conformity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How did Asch investigate the effects of group size?

A

Changed the number of confederates in the group.
Biggers groups increased conformity.
After 3 confederates there was little difference in the levels of conformity.
Normative social influence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How did unanimity affect conformity?

A

Varied whether or not all confederates gave the same incorrect answer.
The presence of a non-conforming* actor reduced conformity by 1/4.
*Dissenter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How did Asch investigate the effects of task difficulty on conformity?

A

Standard and comparison lines made more similar in length.
As difficulty increase, conformity increased.
Informational social influence plays greater role when task is harder as situation is more ambiguous.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Define obedience.

A

Following the orders of an authority figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Briefly describe Milgrams study.

A

Aim - investigate how far people would go in obeying orders from an authority figure.
Participants recruited, arrived at Yale.
Participants assigned to be the teacher, confederate was the actor.
Read out word pairs which the learner had to remember. If wrong, gave an electric shock which gradually got stronger.
All participants reached 300V.
65z reached 450V.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How does proximity affect obedience?

A

Oropiginal study - teacher and learner in adjoining room.
Same room = 40%.
On the phone = 20.5%.
Easier to ignore instructions when not face to face.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

How does uniform affect obedience.

A

Experimenter wears lab coats - 65%.
Everyday clothes - 20%.
Uniform indicates LOA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

How does location affect obedience.

A

When repeated in a run down building the experimenter had less authority.
Obedience fell to 47.5%.
Yale has a reputation/status.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is legitimacy of authority?

A

Authority is agreed by society.
Allowed to exercise social power as it allows society to function.
Some are granted the power to punish.
Learn about and accept this power from childhood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is another word for legitimate?

A

Justified.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Using research evidence, explain one strength of LOA as an explanation of obedience.

A

Research evidence to support.
In Milgram’s study, when experimenter wore a lab coat obedience was higher than when they wore everyday clothes.
Shows that level of perceived authority affects the likelihood that their orders will be obeyed.

30
Q

Explain one strength of LOA as an explanation for obedience.

A

Can explain cultural differences in behaviour.
Milgram replicated study in Australia and found 16% of participants went to highest voltage but in Germany 85% did.
Shows that in different societies how children are raised to perceive authority figures affects obedience.

31
Q

Describe the autonomous state.

A

Person free to make own choices.
Feel responsible for own actions.

32
Q

Describe the agentic state.

A

A mental state.
Feel little/no personal responsibility for actions.
Believe to be acting on behalf of authority figure.

33
Q

What is the agentic shift.

A

The shift from autonomous to agentic state.

34
Q

When does the agentic shift occur?

A

When an authority figure is present.

35
Q

What do binding factors do?

A

Aspects of the situation which allow person to ignore the damaging effect of their behaviour e.g. shifting blame to victim.
Reduce the moral strain therefore making you more likely to stay in the agentic state.

36
Q

Explain excuses for blind obedience as a weakness of agency theory as an explanation for obedience.

A

Gives people an excuse for blind obedience.
Nazis who were racist and prejudice were doing more than just following orders.
Agency theory is potentially dangerous as it excuses people.

37
Q

Describe the authoritarian personality.

A

Exaggerated respect for authority.
More likely to obey orders.
Look down on people of inferior status.

38
Q

Define scapegoating.

A

Displacement of hostility onto others who are socially inferior

39
Q

Why do some people develop an authoritarian personality?

A

Harsh and punitive upbringing, with conditional love and much punishment.
Fear of parents - excessive respect of authority figures.
Hatred of parents - hate displaced onto others.

40
Q

What was the aim of Zimbardos prison study?

A

To see how ordinary men would behave if given the role of guards or prisoners.

41
Q

Describe the method of Zimbardos prison study.

A

Emotionally stable students from Stanford university.
Randomly allocated roles.
Fake prison created in basement of university.
Prisoners arrested at dawn outside own homes to add realism.
Prisoners were strip searched and routine was heavily regulated, 16 rules they had to follow which were consistently enforced by the guards.
Guards were told they had complete power over the prisoners.
Study was supposed to last 2 weeks.

42
Q

Describe the results of Zimbardos prison study.

A

Only lasted 6 days.
Prisoners became depressed as a result of being humiliated by the guards.
Guards harassed the prisoners constantly.
Within 2 days the prisoners rebelled against the guards.
A number of prisoners dropped out and 1 went on hunger strike.

43
Q

What can we conclude from Zimbardos prison study?

A

It revealed the power of the situation to influence people’s behaviour.
Extreme aggressive behaviour in prisons may not be due to personality but rather the role people are given.

44
Q

Explain how Zimbardos study raised several ethical issues.

A

Participants were made to clean toilets with bare hands and arrested outside their house in front of all their neighbours which could have left them very embarrassed.
They were not protected from harm.

45
Q

Explain how Zimbardos may have exaggerated conformity to social roles.

A

Only about 1/3 of guards behaved in a brutal way.
This suggests that dispositional factors such as personality or morals play a role in the extent to which people conform.

46
Q

Describe one strength of Zimbardos prison study.

A

Control over variables.
Only picked emotionally stable participants and then were randomly assigned roles.
This allowed researchers to rule out personality differences as an explanation for the findings as if guards and prisoners behaved very differently then it must be due to the pressure of the situation.
This control means high internal validity.

47
Q

Explain one strength of agency theory as an explanation for obedience.

A

Research support.
Students were shown a film of Milgram’s study and asked who they felt was responsible for the harm to the learner.
The students blamed the experimenter.
This means that they recognised that the authority figure was the cause of obedience, supporting the explanation.

48
Q

How does agency theory explain obedience?

A

People are obedient in the agentic state.

49
Q

How is an authoritarian personality measured?

A

The F scale.
Participants have to agree or disagree with statements such as ‘nobody ever learned anything important except through suffering’
A score of 80+ means you have an authoritarian personality.

50
Q

What are some characteristics of an authoritarian personality?

A

Black and white views.
Projects own feelings of rage and fear onto people of inferior status.
Conventional beliefs about right and wrong.
Excessive respect for authority.

51
Q

Explain one strength of the authoritarian personality as an explanation for obedience.

A

Supporting research evidence.
The most obedient participants in Milgram’s study also scored highly on the F scale, which suggests they have an authoritarian personality.
There is a correlation between authoritarian personality and obedience.

52
Q

Why is being based on correlational data a weakness for the authoritarian personality?

A

You cannot claim authoritarian personality causes greater obedience levels as you cannot prove cause and effect.
Other factors may explain the link.

53
Q

Explain one weakness of the authoritarian personality as an explanation for obedience.

A

Only considers the role of dispositional factors.
Millions of Germans displayed highly obedient behaviour during WW2 but didn’t have the same upbringing and personality. Milgram’s research showed that situational factors also affect obedience.
Suggests the best way to explain obedience may be to consider situational and dispositional factors.

54
Q

Explain social support.

A

The presence of people who resist pressure to conform or obey.
It becomes easier to act independently.
Obedience and conformity are reduced as pressure is reduced.

55
Q

What did we learn from Asch and Milgram about resistance?

A

When a dissenter was introduced, conformity and obedience levels dropped.
Asch - 5.5%
Milgram - 10%

56
Q

What do Asch and Milgrams results tell us about social support?

A

It reduces NSI.
Provides role models for resisting.
Legitimacy is reduced.

57
Q

Explain 2 strengths of social support as an explanation for resistance.

A

Real world application.
Was found that when an 8 week programme to help pregnant teens resist peer pressure to smoking introduced social support, participants were significantly less likely to smoke.
Gives high external validity.

Research support.
Participants worked in groups to gather evidence to run a smear campaign for an oil company. 88% rebelled.
This shows that peer support is linked to greater resistance.

58
Q

How does an internal locus of control affect resistance to social influence.

A

More confident people.
Less need for social approval.
More likely to resist social influence and act according to own beliefs.

59
Q

How does an external locus of control affect resistance to social influence.

A

Believe things happen to them.
Less likely to resist social influence.

60
Q

Explain one strength of locus of control as an explanation for resistance.

A

Research support.
Recreated Milgrams baseline study and measured if participants were internal or externals. 37% of internals did not go to full voltage, 23% of externals did not.
Internals showed greater resistance.
Increases validity of LOC and also our confidence that it can explain resistance.

61
Q

Explain one weakness of LOC.

A

Limited role of LOC.
Rotter states that LOC only comes into play in novel situations, it has very little influence in familiar situations where past experience is more important.
This means that LOC may not be as important of a factor in resistance to social influence as some suggested.

62
Q

Explain consistency in minority social influence.

A

Minority must be synchronised in their views over time as this increases level of interest from others.
Makes other people rethink their own views.

63
Q

Explain commitment in minority social influence.

A

Minority must show dedication to the cause.
Could involve engaging in extreme activities/risk.
Augmentation principle - draws attention.

64
Q

Explain flexibility in minority social influence.

A

Need to be adaptable and willing to listen to valid counter arguements.
Can increase engagement from others.
Shows possibility of compromise.

65
Q

What is the snowball effect?

A

Factors make other people rethink their views.
Gradually more people adopt the views.

66
Q

Describe the research into minority social influence.

A

172 females, 6 groups, 36 slides.
All varying shade of blue.
2 out of 6 participants were confederates.
Consistent - said 36 slides were green.
Inconsistent - said that 24 were green.

67
Q

Describe the results of research into minority social influence.

A

Consistent - participants agreed on 8.4% of trials.
Inconsistent - 1.25%

68
Q

Explain one strength of COMMITMENT in minority social influence.

A

Real life events show the importance.
The suffragettes chained themselves to railing which gained attention and shows dedication. They then managed to get the vote.
This suggests that showing commitment to a minority view is more likely to lead to social change.

69
Q

Explain one strength of CONSISTENCY in minority social influence.

A

Research evidence to support the importance.
Blue slide, green slide study showed that a consistent minority view has a greater effect on changing the views of others.
Suggests that a consistent minority is more likely to lead to social change.

70
Q

Explain why agency theory cannot explain all obedience behaviours.

A

In Milgram’s study 35% of participants were not fully obedient despite being given orders by an authority figure. According to the theory, they should have been in the agentic state.
Suggests agency theory is an incomplete theory.

71
Q

Explain why agency theory only considering social factors is a weakness.

A

Other psychologists have found that dispositional factor e.g. locus of control and authoritarian personality also influence obedience.
Therefore the best way to explain obedience may be to consider both social and dispositional factors.