Social Influence Flashcards
3 types of conformity
compliance - conforming to majority but not really agreeing
identification- conforming to expectation of social role
internalization - public behaviour and private beliefs changed
Normative influence
conforming because everyone else is ‘the norm’
Informational influence
conforming because you believe the other person has the right information
Asch Procedure
line judgement task , Ps were asked to identify which two lines looked most similar in a room full of confederates giving the wrong answer
Asch Results
75% conformed at least once
Pro and Con of Asch
- repeated easily - adds validity
- deception - ethical issue
4 Factors influencing conformity
size of group
nature of response
task difficulty
presence of a dissenter
Perrin and Spencer ( Asch replication)
Used engineering students and found conformity was lower as more confident in decision making
Eagly and Carli ( Asch replication)
Women showed higher conformity rates as they don’t like group conflict whereas men are expected to be assertive
Stanford Prison Proc
Mock prison , Ps were either assigned to guard or prisoner
Day 2 - prisoners revolted, guards harassed prisoners
Day 6- experiment ended as prisoners were having psychological harm
Milgram was influenced by
trial of adolf Aichman , a Nazi soldier whose defnense for killing someone was he was following orders
Milgram proc
40 ps told to deliver shocks to a learner if gave wrong answer with increasing intensities
- experimenter in same room giving prompts that were scripted
- Milgram was watching from a two way mirror
MIlgram results
65% shocked to max voltage
Milgram ( office building %)
48%
Milgram ( learner in same room %)
40%
Milgram ( P’s had to place learner hand on electric plate %)
30%
Milgram ( remote instructions %)
23%
agentic state
person behaves as if they are an agent of someone else - individuals allow someone else to direct their behaviour
autonomous state
someone acting on their own accord and take responsibility for the consequence
binding factors
factors that result in you going ahead to do something that you know you shouldn’t.
moral strain
when we obey an order than goes against our conscience.
agentic shift
shift from autonomous to agentic state
happened in Milgram’s
Milgram ( Milkman giving instruc %)
14%
3 situational factors affecting obedience
proximity, location , uniform
3 factors causing agentic shift
insistence of authority
pressure of location
unwillingness to disrupt
Authoritarian personality
obedient to higher status but hostile to lower status
caused by strict parents as learnt to do as told
Adorno F Scale
Fascist scale - interested as to why so many Nazis followed orders
series of questions - quite directional as all worded in the same way
locus of control
extent to which you believe you are in control of your life
Internal LoC
things happen due to personal choices
External LoC
things happen due to fate