Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

psychology yr12 > Social influence > Flashcards

Social influence Flashcards

(87 cards)

Start Studying
1
Q

What is compliance?

A

publicly adopting a group’s beliefs even if we don’t agree with them privately
- the most shallow type of conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is internalisation?

A

This results in private change as well as public, usually permanent as attitudes have become internalised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is identification?

A

Identifying with a group and adopting their beliefs - because we identify with them we want to be a part of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the ‘need to be liked’ called?

A

Normative social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the ‘need to be right’ called?

A

Informational social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give two examples of conformity studies

A

Asch’s conformity studies
Zimbardos Stanford prison experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many participants were in Asch’s original investigation?

A

123

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the range of group sizes in Asch’s baseline investigation?

A

6-8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

give the baseline procedure of Asch’s’ conformity study

A

Those involved must say out loud which comparison line matches the target line
Confederates (aware) all gave the same incorrect answer each time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

there are _ types of conformity

A

3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the findings of Asch’s conformity studies?

A

Group with Confederates conformed 36.8% (1/3rd) of the time
25% of ppts never conformed (individual differences)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What three ways did Asch alter his procedure in follow up studies?

A

Group size
Unanimity
Task difficulty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

by altering group sizes in a follow up investigation what did Asch find?

A

3 people is enough to sway opinion
Adding more confederates does not seem to increase pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

by having a disparity in unanimity in his follow up investigation what did Asch find?

A

Confederates giving correct answer
Conformity was 5%
Confederates giving different incorrect answer
Conformity 9%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

by altering task difficulty what did Asch find in his follow up investigation?

A

The more similar the lines (the more ambiguous the answer) the more greater the conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Asch’s conformity studies are an example of ________ social influence why is this?

A

Informational
Conformity increased when the line task was more difficult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

give a strength of Asch’s conformity studies

A

Task difficulty research support - Lucas et al asked their participants to solve ‘easy’ & ‘hard’ maths problems - the ppts conformed more often i.e. agreed with the wrong answers when the problems were harder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

give three limitations to Asch’s conformity studies

A

External validity = low , it is unlikely we are put into this situation in real life and therefore many not be an accurate measure of conformity i.e. the task of identifying lines is trivial and so there is no real reason to conform

Cultural/gender bias - Asch’s OG study & his follow ups were done in America and only with white men - can’t be applied to non western/collectivist cultures as conformity may be differ there e.g. research into collectivist cultures has shown higher levels of conformity due to greater importance placed on the group than the individual - so ungeneralisible & limited application

Ethical issues - deception - ppts unaware of true nature of the experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What was the procedure for ZimBardos Stanford prison experiment?

A

21 male student volunteers tested for emotional and psychological stability
They are randomly allocated prison or guard to reduce research bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

how were participants encouraged to conform in ZimBardos Stanford prison experiment?

A

Through uniform and instructions
Prisoner - smock , cap , id number , could ‘apply for parole’ but not ‘leave’
Guard - uniform , cuffs , clubs and shades , complete authority over prisoners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what were the findings of ZimBardos Stanford prison experiment?

A

Guards quickly took on role with enthusiasm

Within two days the prisoners rebelled and the guards retaliated with fire extinguishers

Guards harassed prisoners i.e. headcounts and if refused to ppt they were made to clean the toilets with their bare hands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

how many participants were released early in ZimBardos Stanford prison experiment due to distress?

A

One released post rebellion for psychological disturbance
2 more on day 4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what happened to the participant who went on a hunger strike in ZB’s Stanford prison experiment?

A

Force fed then punished with isolation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

how many days was ZB’s Stanford prison experiment?

A

6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
give two strengths of ZB’s Stanford prison experiment
Internal validity - roles of guards & prisoners randomly allocated and so individual personality differences were ruled out as roles were given by chance so differences in behaviours must be due to the roles themselves - a lot of control over variables Application - The guards willingness to take on their roles and their increasing aggressive behaviours due to the powers given to them & the uniform (loss of identity) may explain police brutality and the reasons behind it
26
Give two limitations of ZB’s Stanford prison experiment
Ethical concerns - violated protection from psychological harm as ppts experienced psychological duress e.g. one ppt released post rebellion for psychological disturbance - violated right to withdraw as prisoners could 'apply for parole' but not 'leave' Contradictory evidence/lack of reliability- BBC prison study very different results, prisoners took control of mock prison and subjected guards to harassment , supported the social identity theory as the guards didnt develop a shared social identity
27
define obedience as a form of social influence
A form of social influence where an individual follows a direct order The individual giving the orders usually a authority figure
28
Give an example of a study that investigates obedience
Milgrams baseline procedure - the influence of authority figures on obedience
29
what did milgram study and why
The influence of authority figures on obedience he couldn’t comprehend how those who were seemingly normal becoming involved in the atrocities of the nazi holocaust Milgram believed answers for this switch might lie in the personality characteristics of German people (perhaps more susceptible)
30
How many participants were in Milgrams original investigation
40 American male volunteers
31
describe the baseline procedure of Milgrams study
Fake lots were drawn for the roles of ‘teacher’ + ‘learner' (mr wallace) - ppt always 'teacher' The voltage was increased by 15 volt increments every time the 'learner' gave an incorrect/no answer the learner gave verbal (fake) protests and eventually went silent when 450 volts was reached Experimenter used 4 prods when participant ‘teacher’ stopped e.g. you must go on
32
How many prods were used by the experimenter in Milgrams baseline procedure
4
33
what were the findings of Milgrams original investigation
65% went to the max 450v All teachers showed signs of distress - 3 had seizures All were debriefed after 84% said they were glad they participated
34
how many ‘teachers’ had a seizure
3
35
what % of participants gave the max voltage
65%
36
what % of participants gave the max voltage
65%
37
what % of participants said they were glad to have participated after having been debriefed
84%
38
what was the conclusion of Milgrams original investigation
Germans were not ‘different’ but variables in situations influence obedience - therefore Milgram conducted follow up studies on the effect of these variables
39
what is one way participants were deceived in Milgrams original investigation
Fake lots were drawn for the roles of ‘teacher’ + ‘learner’
40
give an ethical issue Milgrams research poses
Protection from harm - 3 ‘teachers’ had seizures due to distress
41
what was the strength of Milgrams original investigation
Research support - Hofling et al found that 21 of 22 nurses in a real life hospital were willing to administer potentially lethal doses when ordered by a doctor
42
give two limitations of Milgrams original investigation
Unethical Broke right to withdraw - ppts who wanted to stop with the 'shocks' were encouraged to continue via prods deception + protection from harm - ppts believed the 'learner' was receiving 'shocks' which put ppts under culture bias the sample is unrepresentative of other cultures as it only uses white American males whilst collectivist cultures are more focused on the social group rather than the individual like in western cultures & so obedience levels may differ across cultures - limited application to a wider population Low external validity - doesn't consider gender differences - Sherridan and king , study with humans and puppies - puppies received real shocks if not followed instructions - 54% of men + 100% of women administered shocks when told to - suggests women are more likely to obey an authority figure
43
what were the three situational variables Milgram investigated in his follow up investigations
Proximity Location Uniform
44
describe Milgrams investigation into the situational variable proximity
When Teacher + learner were in the same room 40% level of obedience When teacher puts learners hand on shock plate - 30% obedience When experimenter constructs over the phone - 20.5% obedience
45
describe Milgrams investigation into the situational variable location
When experiment was in a rundown office block - 47.5% obedience When held at Yale its legitimacy was passed on to experimenter + study - teacher feels forced/intimidated by legitimacy of Yale
46
describe Milgrams investigation into the situational variable uniform
When the experimenter was taken over by ‘ordinary person’ in own clothes - obedience was 20% Uniform is correlated to authority and so entitled to obedience
47
which of Milgrams proximity condition experiments which produced the least obedience?
when the experimenter constructed over the phone - 20.5%
48
what is the strength of Milgrams situational variables follow up studies?
Research support Uniform plays important role , Bickmans field experiment showed people are more likely to obey someone dressed as a guard rather than a milkman
49
what are two limitations of Milgrams situational variables follow up investigations
Gender differences Milgram underestimated importance of differences e.g. women may be more susceptible to social influence proven by Sherridan and king study Lack of internal validity Orne and Holland criticise saying ppts figured out the shocks weren’t real - produces demand characteristics
50
Give an example of someone who operated in the agentic state
Adolf Eichmann - oversaw the logistics behind mass deportation of the Jews - he never denied his crimes but defended he was simply following orders
51
what is the autonomous state
When you act independently and feel responsibility
52
what is the agentic shift
When we perceive an authority figure (has a higher position in the social hierarchy) so we are more likely to obey
53
what is the agentic state
Acting as an ‘agent’ binding factors are used to minimise guilt/responsibility complete obedience to authority figure - following instructions
54
give two strengths of situational explanations as a way of explaining obedience
Research support for legitimacy & authority Bickman had confederates dressed in different outfits (security guard, milkman) in New York confederates asked people to do things e.g. pick up litter - more likely to obey security guard Cross cultural support for legitimate authority Kilham + Mann replicated Milgram’s procedure in Australia they found 16% of ppts went up to top voltage - Mantell found different figures for Germany - 85% - increases validity
55
give two limitations of situational explanations as an explanation for obedience
Limited explanation Agentic shift does not explain why some of the ppts did not obey in Milgram's study- dictates humans are social animals in a social hierarchy inclined to obey Contradictory research Rank + Jacobson found 16 out of 18 nurses refused to administer a lethal drug dose that they were familiar with when ordered by a doctor - replication of Hofling et al but with drug nurses knew
56
the agentic state is a _________ explanation for obedience
Situational
57
the two situational explanations for obedience are
The agentic state Legitimacy of authority
58
most societies operate on a ______ and we learn to accept authority as legitimate early
Hierarchy
59
Acceptance of authority becomes problematic when the authority figure is __________
Destructive
60
Give examples of times an authority figure has become destructive
Stalin Hitler
61
who proposed the authoritarian personality as an explanation for obedience
Adorno et al
62
the authoritarian personality is a _________ explanation
Dispositional
63
What did Adorno et al say high obedience is equivocal to
A psychological disorder caused by individual personality
64
give three features of the Authoritarian personality
Critical of society Submissive to authority Contempt for inferior social status - those who are othered
65
what are the 3 possible origins of the authoritarian personality
Harsh parenting Impossibly high expectations Conditions of love creates resentment + hostility displaced onto weaker substitutes
66
what did Adorno et al develop to measure the authoritarian personality
The f scale
67
how many white male Americans did Adorno et al test using the f scale
2000 white middle class male Americans
68
What did Adorno et al find when testing 2000 white male Americans using the f scale
A strong correlation between authoritarian and prejudice - those who scored high had definitive/separatist thinking + stereotyped identifying with the ‘strong’ and contempt for the weak
69
What are two strengths of the dispositional explanation as a way of explaining obedience
Research support Elms & Milgram - those who scored high on the f scale gave the highest voltage to confederates Real world application Can explain the brutality behind Mei lei massacre + nazi holocaust
70
Give two limitations of the dispositional explanation to obedience
Political bias F scale measures extreme right wing tendencies - Christie + Jahoda point out the reality of left wing authoritarianism in the Russian Bolshevism or Chinese Maoism - not comprehensive dispositional explanation can’t account for whole political spectrum Limited explanation + WW2 Germany Tendency to give explanations for human behaviour when a large majority of Germans were just racist + identified with the anti semitic Nazi state
71
what is a situational explanation for resistance to social influence
Social support - having someone else resisting social pressure acts as a role model
72
What two things does social support lead to
Resisting conformity Resisting obedience
73
what is resisting conformity
The presence of a dissenter gives others permission to follow their own conscience
73
what is resisting conformity
The presence of a dissenter gives others permission to follow their own conscience
74
Give an example of resisting conformity
Asch's study , conformity dropped to 5% as ppts were encouraged to give correct answers
75
what is resisting obedience
The presence of a dissenter challenges the legitimacy of authority & frees others to follow their own conscience
76
Give an example of resisting obedience
Milgrams study - variations provided evidence of resistance to obedience
77
the presence of a _______ provides social support to resist social influence
Dissenter
78
what is a dispositional explanation for resistance to social influence
Locus of control - depends on our sense of how in control of our lives we are
79
Who proposed locus of control
Rutter
80
what is a low internal LOC
We are in control of our lives + responsible for our actions
81
why does having a low internal LOC make resistance easier
Believe they are responsible for their own actions and have qualities typically associated with leadership e.g. self confidence , higher intelligence
82
what is a high external LOC
We believe outside factors control our lives and determine our actions
83
A dissenter acts as a ____ _____ for others
Role model
84
what is a strength of social support as a way of explaining resistance to social influence
Research support Gamson et al (1982) found higher levels of resistance in their study than Milgram - role of dissenting peers in obedience - they were in groups - 29 out of 33 (88%) rebelled showing peer support is linked to greater resistance
85
what is a strength of LOC as a way of explaining resistance to social influence
Holland repeated Milgram’s baseline study & measured whether ppts were internal or external - 37% internals did not continue to highest shock level compared to 23% externals did not continue - internals = greater resistance to authority
86
What is a limitation of LOC as a explanation for resistance to social influence
Research also contradicts LOC Twenge (2004) analysed data from US obedient studies - data showed over time span people became more resistant to obedience & developed more external LOC - if it was linked to LOC people would have had internal LOC because resistance increased

psychology yr12 (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions