Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

psychology yr12 > Social influence > Flashcards

Social influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
AP® Psychology flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards Psychology 101 flashcards
1
Q

What is compliance?

A

publicly adopting a group’s beliefs even if we don’t agree with them privately
- the most shallow type of conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is internalisation?

A

This results in private change as well as public, usually permanent as attitudes have become internalised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is identification?

A

Identifying with a group and adopting their beliefs - because we identify with them we want to be a part of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the ‘need to be liked’ called?

A

Normative social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the ‘need to be right’ called?

A

Informational social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give two examples of conformity studies

A

Asch’s conformity studies
Zimbardos Stanford prison experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many participants were in Asch’s original investigation?

A

123

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the range of group sizes in Asch’s baseline investigation?

A

6-8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

give the baseline procedure of Asch’s’ conformity study

A

Those involved must say out loud which comparison line matches the target line
Confederates (aware) all gave the same incorrect answer each time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

there are _ types of conformity

A

3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the findings of Asch’s conformity studies?

A

Group with Confederates conformed 36.8% (1/3rd) of the time
25% of ppts never conformed (individual differences)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What three ways did Asch alter his procedure in follow up studies?

A

Group size
Unanimity
Task difficulty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

by altering group sizes in a follow up investigation what did Asch find?

A

3 people is enough to sway opinion
Adding more confederates does not seem to increase pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

by having a disparity in unanimity in his follow up investigation what did Asch find?

A

Confederates giving correct answer
Conformity was 5%
Confederates giving different incorrect answer
Conformity 9%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

by altering task difficulty what did Asch find in his follow up investigation?

A

The more similar the lines (the more ambiguous the answer) the more greater the conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Asch’s conformity studies are an example of ________ social influence why is this?

A

Informational
Conformity increased when the line task was more difficult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

give a strength of Asch’s conformity studies

A

Task difficulty research support - Lucas et al asked their participants to solve ‘easy’ & ‘hard’ maths problems - the ppts conformed more often i.e. agreed with the wrong answers when the problems were harder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

give three limitations to Asch’s conformity studies

A

External validity = low , it is unlikely we are put into this situation in real life and therefore many not be an accurate measure of conformity i.e. the task of identifying lines is trivial and so there is no real reason to conform

Cultural/gender bias - Asch’s OG study & his follow ups were done in America and only with white men - can’t be applied to non western/collectivist cultures as conformity may be differ there e.g. research into collectivist cultures has shown higher levels of conformity due to greater importance placed on the group than the individual - so ungeneralisible & limited application

Ethical issues - deception - ppts unaware of true nature of the experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What was the procedure for ZimBardos Stanford prison experiment?

A

21 male student volunteers tested for emotional and psychological stability
They are randomly allocated prison or guard to reduce research bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

how were participants encouraged to conform in ZimBardos Stanford prison experiment?

A

Through uniform and instructions
Prisoner - smock , cap , id number , could ‘apply for parole’ but not ‘leave’
Guard - uniform , cuffs , clubs and shades , complete authority over prisoners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what were the findings of ZimBardos Stanford prison experiment?

A

Guards quickly took on role with enthusiasm

Within two days the prisoners rebelled and the guards retaliated with fire extinguishers

Guards harassed prisoners i.e. headcounts and if refused to ppt they were made to clean the toilets with their bare hands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

how many participants were released early in ZimBardos Stanford prison experiment due to distress?

A

One released post rebellion for psychological disturbance
2 more on day 4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what happened to the participant who went on a hunger strike in ZB’s Stanford prison experiment?

A

Force fed then punished with isolation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

how many days was ZB’s Stanford prison experiment?

A

6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

give two strengths of ZB’s Stanford prison experiment

A

Internal validity - roles of guards & prisoners randomly allocated and so individual personality differences were ruled out as roles were given by chance so differences in behaviours must be due to the roles themselves - a lot of control over variables

Application - The guards willingness to take on their roles and their increasing aggressive behaviours due to the powers given to them & the uniform (loss of identity) may explain police brutality and the reasons behind it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Give two limitations of ZB’s Stanford prison experiment

A

Ethical concerns - violated protection from psychological harm as ppts experienced psychological duress e.g. one ppt released post rebellion for psychological disturbance - violated right to withdraw as prisoners could ‘apply for parole’ but not ‘leave’

Contradictory evidence/lack of reliability- BBC prison study very different results, prisoners took control of mock prison and subjected guards to harassment , supported the social identity theory as the guards didnt develop a shared social identity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

define obedience as a form of social influence

A

A form of social influence where an individual follows a direct order
The individual giving the orders usually a authority figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Give an example of a study that investigates obedience

A

Milgrams baseline procedure - the influence of authority figures on obedience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

what did milgram study and why

A

The influence of authority figures on obedience he couldn’t comprehend how those who were seemingly normal becoming involved in the atrocities of the nazi holocaust

Milgram believed answers for this switch might lie in the personality characteristics of German people (perhaps more susceptible)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

How many participants were in Milgrams original investigation

A

40 American male volunteers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

describe the baseline procedure of Milgrams study

A

Fake lots were drawn for the roles of ‘teacher’ + ‘learner’ (mr wallace) - ppt always ‘teacher’

The voltage was increased by 15 volt increments every time the ‘learner’ gave an incorrect/no answer

the learner gave verbal (fake) protests and eventually
went silent when 450 volts was reached

Experimenter used 4 prods when participant ‘teacher’ stopped e.g. you must go on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

How many prods were used by the experimenter in Milgrams baseline procedure

A

4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

what were the findings of Milgrams original investigation

A

65% went to the max 450v

All teachers showed signs of distress - 3 had seizures

All were debriefed after 84% said they were glad they participated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

how many ‘teachers’ had a seizure

A

3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

what % of participants gave the max voltage

A

65%

36
Q

what % of participants gave the max voltage

A

65%

37
Q

what % of participants said they were glad to have participated after having been debriefed

A

84%

38
Q

what was the conclusion of Milgrams original investigation

A

Germans were not ‘different’ but variables in situations influence obedience - therefore Milgram conducted follow up studies on the effect of these variables

39
Q

what is one way participants were deceived in Milgrams original investigation

A

Fake lots were drawn for the roles of ‘teacher’ + ‘learner’

40
Q

give an ethical issue Milgrams research poses

A

Protection from harm - 3 ‘teachers’ had seizures due to distress

41
Q

what was the strength of Milgrams original investigation

A

Research support -
Hofling et al found that 21 of 22 nurses in a real life hospital were willing to administer potentially lethal doses when ordered by a doctor

42
Q

give two limitations of Milgrams original investigation

A

Unethical
Broke right to withdraw - ppts who wanted to stop with the ‘shocks’ were encouraged to continue via prods
deception + protection from harm - ppts believed the ‘learner’ was receiving ‘shocks’ which put ppts under

culture bias
the sample is unrepresentative of other cultures as it only uses white American males whilst collectivist cultures are more focused on the social group rather than the individual like in western cultures & so obedience levels may differ across cultures - limited application to a wider population

Low external validity - doesn’t consider gender differences - Sherridan and king , study with humans and puppies - puppies received real shocks if not followed instructions - 54% of men + 100% of women administered shocks when told to - suggests women are more likely to obey an authority figure

43
Q

what were the three situational variables Milgram investigated in his follow up investigations

A

Proximity
Location
Uniform

44
Q

describe Milgrams investigation into the situational variable proximity

A

When Teacher + learner were in the same room 40% level of obedience
When teacher puts learners hand on shock plate - 30% obedience
When experimenter constructs over the phone - 20.5% obedience

45
Q

describe Milgrams investigation into the situational variable location

A

When experiment was in a rundown office block - 47.5% obedience
When held at Yale its legitimacy was passed on to experimenter + study - teacher feels forced/intimidated by legitimacy of Yale

46
Q

describe Milgrams investigation into the situational variable uniform

A

When the experimenter was taken over by ‘ordinary person’ in own clothes - obedience was 20%
Uniform is correlated to authority and so entitled to obedience

47
Q

which of Milgrams proximity condition experiments which produced the least obedience?

A

when the experimenter constructed over the phone - 20.5%

48
Q

what is the strength of Milgrams situational variables follow up studies?

A

Research support
Uniform plays important role , Bickmans field experiment showed people are more likely to obey someone dressed as a guard rather than a milkman

49
Q

what are two limitations of Milgrams situational variables follow up investigations

A

Gender differences
Milgram underestimated importance of differences e.g. women may be more susceptible to social influence proven by Sherridan and king study

Lack of internal validity
Orne and Holland criticise saying ppts figured out the shocks weren’t real - produces demand characteristics

50
Q

Give an example of someone who operated in the agentic state

A

Adolf Eichmann - oversaw the logistics behind mass deportation of the Jews - he never denied his crimes but defended he was simply following orders

51
Q

what is the autonomous state

A

When you act independently and feel responsibility

52
Q

what is the agentic shift

A

When we perceive an authority figure (has a higher position in the social hierarchy) so we are more likely to obey

53
Q

what is the agentic state

A

Acting as an ‘agent’
binding factors are used to minimise guilt/responsibility complete obedience to authority figure - following instructions

54
Q

give two strengths of situational explanations as a way of explaining obedience

A

Research support for legitimacy & authority
Bickman had confederates dressed in different outfits (security guard, milkman) in New York confederates asked people to do things e.g. pick up litter - more likely to obey security guard

Cross cultural support for legitimate authority
Kilham + Mann replicated Milgram’s procedure in Australia they found 16% of ppts went up to top voltage - Mantell found different figures for Germany - 85% - increases validity

55
Q

give two limitations of situational explanations as an explanation for obedience

A

Limited explanation
Agentic shift does not explain why some of the ppts did not obey in Milgram’s study- dictates humans are social animals in a social hierarchy inclined to obey

Contradictory research
Rank + Jacobson found 16 out of 18 nurses refused to administer a lethal drug dose that they were familiar with when ordered by a doctor - replication of Hofling et al but with drug nurses knew

56
Q

the agentic state is a _________ explanation for obedience

A

Situational

57
Q

the two situational explanations for obedience are

A

The agentic state
Legitimacy of authority

58
Q

most societies operate on a ______ and we learn to accept authority as legitimate early

A

Hierarchy

59
Q

Acceptance of authority becomes problematic when the authority figure is __________

A

Destructive

60
Q

Give examples of times an authority figure has become destructive

A

Stalin
Hitler

61
Q

who proposed the authoritarian personality as an explanation for obedience

A

Adorno et al

62
Q

the authoritarian personality is a _________ explanation

A

Dispositional

63
Q

What did Adorno et al say high obedience is equivocal to

A

A psychological disorder caused by individual personality

64
Q

give three features of the Authoritarian personality

A

Critical of society
Submissive to authority
Contempt for inferior social status - those who are othered

65
Q

what are the 3 possible origins of the authoritarian personality

A

Harsh parenting
Impossibly high expectations
Conditions of love creates resentment + hostility displaced onto weaker substitutes

66
Q

what did Adorno et al develop to measure the authoritarian personality

A

The f scale

67
Q

how many white male Americans did Adorno et al test using the f scale

A

2000 white middle class male Americans

68
Q

What did Adorno et al find when testing 2000 white male Americans using the f scale

A

A strong correlation between authoritarian and prejudice - those who scored high had definitive/separatist thinking + stereotyped identifying with the ‘strong’ and contempt for the weak

69
Q

What are two strengths of the dispositional explanation as a way of explaining obedience

A

Research support
Elms & Milgram - those who scored high on the f scale gave the highest voltage to confederates

Real world application
Can explain the brutality behind Mei lei massacre + nazi holocaust

70
Q

Give two limitations of the dispositional explanation to obedience

A

Political bias
F scale measures extreme right wing tendencies - Christie + Jahoda point out the reality of left wing authoritarianism in the Russian Bolshevism or Chinese Maoism - not comprehensive dispositional explanation can’t account for whole political spectrum

Limited explanation + WW2 Germany
Tendency to give explanations for human behaviour when a large majority of Germans were just racist + identified with the anti semitic Nazi state

71
Q

what is a situational explanation for resistance to social influence

A

Social support - having someone else resisting social pressure acts as a role model

72
Q

What two things does social support lead to

A

Resisting conformity
Resisting obedience

73
Q

what is resisting conformity

A

The presence of a dissenter gives others permission to follow their own conscience

73
Q

what is resisting conformity

A

The presence of a dissenter gives others permission to follow their own conscience

74
Q

Give an example of resisting conformity

A

Asch’s study , conformity dropped to 5% as ppts were encouraged to give correct answers

75
Q

what is resisting obedience

A

The presence of a dissenter challenges the legitimacy of authority & frees others to follow their own conscience

76
Q

Give an example of resisting obedience

A

Milgrams study - variations provided evidence of resistance to obedience

77
Q

the presence of a _______ provides social support to resist social influence

A

Dissenter

78
Q

what is a dispositional explanation for resistance to social influence

A

Locus of control - depends on our sense of how in control of our lives we are

79
Q

Who proposed locus of control

A

Rutter

80
Q

what is a low internal LOC

A

We are in control of our lives + responsible for our actions

81
Q

why does having a low internal LOC make resistance easier

A

Believe they are responsible for their own actions and have qualities typically associated with leadership e.g. self confidence , higher intelligence

82
Q

what is a high external LOC

A

We believe outside factors control our lives and determine our actions

83
Q

A dissenter acts as a ____ _____ for others

A

Role model

84
Q

what is a strength of social support as a way of explaining resistance to social influence

A

Research support
Gamson et al (1982) found higher levels of resistance in their study than Milgram - role of dissenting peers in obedience - they were in groups - 29 out of 33 (88%) rebelled showing peer support is linked to greater resistance

85
Q

what is a strength of LOC as a way of explaining resistance to social influence

A

Holland repeated Milgram’s baseline study & measured whether ppts were internal or external - 37% internals did not continue to highest shock level compared to 23% externals did not continue - internals = greater resistance to authority

86
Q

What is a limitation of LOC as a explanation for resistance to social influence

A

Research also contradicts LOC
Twenge (2004) analysed data from US obedient studies - data showed over time span people became more resistant to obedience & developed more external LOC - if it was linked to LOC people would have had internal LOC because resistance increased

psychology yr12 (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions