Social Impact Flashcards
What is the social impact theory discuss
How we behave within social areas
What is the source
Person doing the influencing
What is the target
People who are influenced
3 aspects of social impact theory
Strength
Immediacy
Numbers
Explain strength
How much power you believe the person ordering you has
Example of strength
Hierarchy
Uniform
Title
Explain immediacy
How recent the influence is and how close to you they are
Examples of immediacy
Physical proximity
Time
Explain numbers
The more people putting pressure on you to do something
Explain the psychosocial
The first source of influence has most dramatic impact
Second, third, forth sources generate less and less social force
Explain divisions of impact
Social force gets spread out between all the people it is directed at
Explain diffusion of responsibility
The more people the less personal each person will feel
Sedikides and Jackson procedure
Visitors were asked not to lean on railings at New York zoo
How is strength tested in Sedikides and Jackson
Confederate wearing uniform
Confederate wearing t-shirt and shorts
How is immediacy tested in Sedikides and Jackson
Confederate in same room
Confederate in adjacent room
How is division of impact tested in sedikides and Jackson
Group of one or two
Group of 5/6
Results when confederate was dressed as zoo keeper
58% obedience
Results when confederate was dressed in t-shirt and shorts
35% obedience
Results when confederate in same room (S + J)
61% obedience
Results when confederate in adjacent room (S + J)
7% obedience
Results for confederate with group of one or two
60% obedience
Results when confederate with group of 5/6
14% obedience
Couplet 1 for SIT + obedience
AO1: learner and teacher in different room - Milgram
DM: this demonstrates
AO3: weak in immediacy - not within close proximity
EDM: Therefore, empathy cannot be shown which could’ve affected obedience levels and resulted in less than 65% administering 450V
Second couplet for SIT and obedience
AO1: strength - authority figure
DM: shown by
AO3: Hofling - called nurses and asked for them to admitted overdose - 95% compiled
EDM: this suggests nurses saw doctor as having high power so felt obligated to obey
Fourth couplet of SIT + obedience
AO1: immediacy - does having a source close affect obedience
DM: shown by
AO3: Sedikides and Jackson
Same room: 61%
Adjacent room: 7%
EDM: These results support SIT - obedience increases with increased level of immediacy
Third couplet of SIT + obedience
AO1: Strength - does uniform affect how much power the person ordering you has
DM: shown by
AO3: Sedikides + Jackson
Uniform: 65%
Short + t-shirt: 35%
EDM: therefore this demonstrates that uniform increases obedience as they view you as having higher power
Explain the Hofling study
Arranged for unknown doctor to telephone 22 nurses
Asked them to administer over does of a drug not on their ward list
Results of Hofling study
95% obeyed
Conclusion of Hofling study
Challenges social impact - source being absent did not reduce effect/ didn’t appear to make a difference