Milgram Flashcards
Aim of Milgram
Understand German behaviour Holocaust
Test obedience to legitimate authority
Procedure of milgram
40 volunteers - American 20-50 yrs
Paid $4.50 + told to withdraw
Voltage increased in 15V each time until 450V
4 standardised prods
Teacher could leave after all prompts
What are the 3 roles of Milgram and explain
Experimenter - prodded participant
Learner - received shock + protested
Teacher - distributed shock
Name some prods
Please continue
The experiment requires you to continue
You have no choice but to continue
How many people administered to full 450V
65%
How many continued to 300V
100%
How many dropped out at 300V
12.5%
What did some learners do to show stress
Tremble
Sweat
Bite lips
How many teachers had nervous laughter
35%
Conclusions of Milgram
Ordinary Americans = surprisingly obedient
Some factors affect obedience - competence, reputation of researcher, idea of advancing science
Generalisability of Milgram
All male - cannot generalise to females
All American - cannot generalise to other cultures
Time locked in early 1960s
Reliability of Milgram
Replicated - 19 variations
Prescripted prods + recorded response remains the same
Application of Milgram
Obedience in schools
Authority figures should wear uniform
Validity of Milgram
Lacks ecological validity - artificial
People assumed it was episode of famous prank show
Ethics of Milgram
Well-being ignored
Deceived about shocks
Not give informed consent
Did debrief
First couplet of Milgram + obedience essay
AO1: only Caucasian males
DM: Therefore, this study suffers from
AO3: Ethnocentrism- only one ethnicity studied
EDM: Furthermore, cannot be generalised to other ethnicities, may differ in obedience
Second couplet of Milgram + obedience essay
AO3: lacks ecological validity
DM: because
AO1: learners prodded with electrical shock that increases in voltage
EDM: therefore artificial task that is not representative of real life situations
Cannot give true response on how people obey
Third couplet on Milgram and obedience essay
AO3: Ethically challenged - not given right to withdraw
DM: this is supported by
AO1: prods “it is essential to continue”
Causes strsss - feel as if they cannot withdraw
EDM: however, at the start they can withdraw whenever and still get money
Forth couplet on Milgram + obedience essay
AO1: 40 male volunteers
DM: consequently this study suffers from
AO3: gender bias + androcentrism - only one gender studied
EDM: this shows that, study cannot be generalised to female population - may differ in obedience
Explain variation #7
Experimenter gives instructions and leaves teacher alone
If teachers have Qs they phone experimenter
Prods delivered over phone
Results of variation #7
Significant drop in obedience down to 22.5%
Gave lower shocks than told to do
Conclusion of variation #7
Physical presence is important for obedience
Explain variation #10
Milgram moved study to a run down office in Bridgeport - so participants don’t link study to the uni
Results of variation #10
Big drop obedience to 45.5%
Participants showed more doubts + asked more Qs
One said study is ‘heartless’