social categorisation Flashcards

1
Q

what is personal identity

A

personality characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is social identity

A

groups you are a member of

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is a category

A

collections of instances that have a family resemblance organised around a prototype.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are prototypes

A

cognitive representation of typical defining features of a category.
- standards against which family resemblance is assessed and category membership decided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what did Rosch say about categories

A

they are not rigid but fuzzy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

why do we categorise

A
  • save cognitive energy
  • clarifies and refines perception of the world
  • maintain a positive self esteem
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are some common group distinctions

A
  • sexual orientation
  • profession
  • age
  • race
  • class
  • employment status
  • nationality
  • immigrant status
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is illusory correlation in terms of stereotypes

A
  • negative stereotypes may occur when people inaccurately pair minority groups with negative events/behaviours because they are both distinct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what did Hamilton and Sherman find about illusory correlation stereotyping

A
  • asked white american pps to estimate the arrest rate of various types of americans
  • african americans were estimated to have higher arrest rates than they did
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the effects of stereotyping

A
  • behaviour assimilation-stereotypes don’t just influence our perceptions of others, they can influence our own behaviour
  • stereotype threat - can lead to poor performance
  • prejudice and discrimination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what task was used by Bargh et al to investigate behaviour assimilation

A

the scrambled sentence task - making sentences out of randomly ordered words
- 2 conditions - words associated with elderly and neutral words unrelated to age
- measured how long it took them to leave the room after

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what were the results of the scrambled word task

A
  • pps primed with elderly words behaved in a way related to an elderly stereotype - moved more slow to leave the room
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the issue with bargh’s scrambled word task

A
  • often don’t replicate
  • people need to care about whats being primed
  • papies - people who want to be thinner make healthier food choices after being primed with associated words e.g. diet but only works for people who want a healthy diet
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what did tan and barber find about stereotype threat

A
  • examined whether age based stereotypes impact older chinese adults
  • tested older chinese pps memory under a stereotype threat condition
  • found poorer memory recall in stereotype threat condition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is prejudice

A
  • strong, highly accessible negative attitude
  • dominated by cognitive bias and negative stereotypes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is discrimination

A

behaviour based on unjust treatment of certain groups
- reluctance to help
- tokenism
- reverse discrimination

17
Q

what did Gaetner and Dovidio find about reluctance to help in discrimination

A
  • pps were more reluctant to help a minority member than their own group when faced with an emergency but only when others were present
18
Q

what is tokenism in terms of discrimination and what did Monin and miller find about it

A
  • process of favouring a member of a minority group in isolated episodes
  • found that pps who were given the opportunity to hire a well-qualified minority candidate were willing to discriminate against other minorities in future hiring, as they had already proved that they were not prejudices
19
Q

what is reverse discrimination

A

opening displays pro-minority behaviour but as a way to deflect accusations of prejudice e.g. giving more money to a minority when feeling threatened

20
Q

what did Dovidio et al 1996 find about racism

A

decline of racist attitudes over 60 years

21
Q

what did Quillian and Lee find about discrimination 2022

A

found that hiring discrimination amongst among 170k apps for minority groups has not fallen over the past decades
- specific stereotypes changed, but negativity remains

22
Q

what is new/modern racism

A

conflict between evaluation towards out-group and values of equality and egalitarian attitudes
- a bit more implicit

23
Q

what are the three theories of subtle prejudice

A
  • modern or symbolic racism
  • ambivalent racism
  • ambivalent sexism
24
Q

what is modern or symbolic racism

A
  • blaming the victim
  • support of policies that all happen to disadvantage racial minorities
25
Q

what is ambivalent racism

A
  • high scores on pro-black attitudes
  • high scores on anti-black attitudes
26
Q

what is ambivalent sexism

A
  • hostile sexism paints women in a negative light
  • benevolent sexism could be seen as apparently positive
27
Q

what causes prejudice

A
  • historical/economical - linked to the psychological notion of frustration of aggression
  • psychological - individual differences in personality, group processes
28
Q

what is the frustration-aggression hypothesis

A

dollard et al
- frustration causes aggression
- psychic energy built up by frustration needs an outlet - scapegoat
- linked to displacement

29
Q

what are the stages in frustration aggression

A
  • identification of personal goals
  • psychic energy activated
  • frustration of goal achievement
  • source of frustration too powerful
  • scapegoat found; catharsis achieved by displacing aggression
30
Q

what evidence did hovland and sears find

A
  • study about cotton workers
  • over a fifty period measures; the price of cotton, number of lynchings of black workers
  • as frustration increased lynching’s increased
31
Q

what are authoritarian personality traits

A
  • extreme reactions to authority figures
  • obsession with rank and status
  • tendency to displace anger
  • related to upbringing - harsh parental discipline
32
Q

what evidence did adorno et al find for authoritarian personality

A
  • interviews about childhood
  • questions monitoring anti-semitism, ethnocentrism, political and economic conservatism, potential for fascism
  • correlation between the harshness of upbringing and measures of prejudice
33
Q

what are criticisms of the authoritarian personality explanation

A
  • can’t determine cause and effect
  • poor methodology - memory
  • ignores social context
34
Q

what did tajfel argue about social learning

A

rather than personality, hatred and suspicion of certain groups are learnt in early life

35
Q

what evidence did barret and short find about social learning

A

english children aged 4-5 years old
- french and spanish were liked, followed by italians, germans were liked the least
- due to parental prejudices - modelling and conditioning

36
Q

what evidence did minard find about conformity

A
  • investigated attutudes of white miners
  • 60% would readily switch between racism and non racism depending on whether situational norms encouraged or discouraged prejudice
37
Q

what is the social identity theory

A
  • we have a social identity as well as a personal one. made up of how we categorise ourselves in terms of social groups
  • intergroup differentiation - in group vs outgroup
  • depersonalisation
  • in group bias
38
Q

what did hogg and vaughan find about prejudice

A
  • school teacher jane elliot
  • tried to highlight effects of prejudice to school children - blue eyed were children were inferior and had to wear a collar and lost privileges
  • brown eyed children were very quick to derogate those blue eyes
39
Q

what did akrami et al find

A
  • explored whether personality or social psychology or a combination of both predicted sexism
  • sexism was best explained by considering the combined influence of both personality and social psychology conflicts
  • necessary to integrate various approaches to explain prejudice