Social Behavior Inventory Flashcards

1
Q

The Social Behavior Inventory was developed by ________ for studying _______

A

Moskowitz; interpersonal behaviours in daily life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does the Social Behavior Inventory assesses?

A

Assesses 4 constructs:
- Dominant
- Submissive
- Agreeable,
- Quarrelsomebehaviours
- Adapted from Wiggins’ interpersonal circumplex model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Items were written to ensure_______

A

relevance across contexts (e.g., work, home, recreation).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Social Behavior Inventory is a type of ____ recording

A

Event-contingent
(IRM-NS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Interpersonal Circle (Wiggins’ interpersonal circumplex model): Major dimensions and continuum

A

AGENCY: Dominant <-> Submissive
COMMUNION: Quarrelsome <-> Agreeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sample behaviours: Dominant (3)

A
  • Setting goals for others
  • Asking the other to do something
  • Expressing an opinion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sample behaviours: Submissive (3)

A
  • Waiting for the other person to act or talk first
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Sample behaviours: Agreeable (3)

A
  • Expressive reassurance
  • Compromising about a decision
  • Smiling and laughing with others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sample behaviours: Quarrelsome (3)

A
  • Not responding to other(s) questions or comments
  • Showing impatience
  • Making a sarcastic comment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain how the Social Behavior Inventory was made (4)

A
  • Item development
  • Item validation
  • Event-Contingent Recording (study to examine reliability/validity/psychometric properties…)
  • Scale refinement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Social Behavior Inventory: Item development (2)

A
  • Items sourced from existing measures and created in consultation with managers.
  • Designed to be socially acceptable and context-independent.
  • Sample item for Dominant: “I set goals for the other.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Social Behavior Inventory: Item Validation (2)

A
  • Items rated by experts and managers for alignment with constructs (coefficient alpha > .80).
  • Selection criteria: Item ratings at least 1 SD above the mean for their behaviour scale.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the initial Social Behavior Inventory study (4)

A
  • Participants documented behaviours after social interactions (>5 min) over 20 days.
  • Forms randomized across** four versions** to avoid response sets.
  • Participants: Working adults (ages 20–56), varied occupations, ~50% lived with a spouse.
  • Average of 6 records/day per participant (~120 records each).
    (+ Interviews at large companies)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Social Behavior Inventory: Scale Refinement

A

Selected 12 items per construct based on correlations with IAS–R (Interpersonal Adjectives Scales—Revised).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Psychometric Properties

A
  • Moderate to high internal consistency (α = .45 to .84).
  • High stability across time (e.g., 20-day data: α = .95 to .96).
  • Convergent validity with IAS–R scales (correlations: .25 to .46).
  • Structural correlations aligned with interpersonal circumplex predictions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Applications (2)

A
  • Studying temporal behavioural patterns, situational effects, affect-behaviour relations, and perceptions of others.
  • Research contexts: Gender, attachment style, psychopathology, serotonergic manipulations, role status, etc.
17
Q

Construct Approach to Scale Development (Lecture) (4)

A

(1) Interpersonal Circle model used to define constructs
(2) Gathered items
-> 1-occasion questionnaires + Interviews at large company to identify sample behaviors
(3) 15 judges rated whether items were relevant to each construct
(4) Initial ECR study; used to examine:
- Internal consistency
- Stability
- Generalizability of scales over situations
- Whether correlations between scales matched theoretical model
- Convergence with constructs measured by a questionnaire measure
- Discriminant validity of scales from a questionnaire measure

18
Q

How to Measure Stability Across Days (Social Behavior Inventory)

A

-> The mean of each scale calculated for each day
-> Coeff Alpha was calculated for each scale based on each of 20-day scores
Coeff alpha often increase as time passes by (4 days < 1 month) - time for behaviour to be stabilized

19
Q

How to Measure Internal Consistency (Social Behavior Inventory)

A

Coeff alpha

20
Q

Summary:
- ___ stability
- ___ internal consistency
- Evidence for ____
- Can measure ____ and ____ in behavior

A

high, moderate, convergent/discriminant validity, mean levels, variability/specificity

21
Q

Social Behavior Inventory: Stability across Weeks of Flux and Spin, what were the results

A

High alpha coeff/spin:
Pple vary → but that variation is stable