Objective personality tests Flashcards

1
Q

Personality def

A

A person’s unique and usual pattern of behavior, feelings and thoughts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Content of personality: (3)

A

Behavior, Affect, Cognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Personality Traits def

A

Relatively enduring dispositions to act, think, or feel in a certain manner in any given circumstance and that distinguish one person from another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Multivariate historical tradition of personality

A

To understand personality of individuals, you have to consider all personality traits as one. (A person cannot be described with only one trait)
=> NEO-PR, as other personality tests, follows from multivariate approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Structure of traits

A

Identification of significant dimensions (attributed) along which individuals vary from one another
+ Characterize the covariation among these personality attributes among individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Lexical tradition of personality

A

Most important traits represented by single words. Origin of NEO-PR relies on lexical tradition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lexical hypothesis

A

If an idea is important for pple, they’ll have a word that will express this concept.
-> The more important the concept, the more word exist for this concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How do we prove lexical hypothesis?

A

Factor analysis used to synthesize dictionary information.
Goal = Identify the smallest number of factors or groups of adjectives that represent the widest variety of adjectives in the language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Are Big Five Distinct Categories or a Continuum?

A

Continuum.
-> Labels are used categorically; the leave behind important information
-> Labels apply more strongly to those at the extreme ends

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

NEO: Construction (history)

A
  • 1978: Included only 3 factors - N, E, O (no scales for A and C) and 18 facets
  • 1985: A and C added: First NEO-PR
  • 1992 manual: Facet scales available for all factors + Included the short version (NEO-FFI) + Rational Scale Construction (supported by factor analysis)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

NEO-PI-R - Psychometric properties: Reliability -Internal consistency

A

Traits: .86-.92
Facets: .56-.81
- Cuz fewer items to measure each of the facets (normal range)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

NEO-PI-R - Psychometric properties: Test-retest reliability

A

High but bit weaker as time interval extends.
- 3 month → .75-.83
- 6-year N,E,O → .68-.83
- 3-year A,C → .63 & .79

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

NEO-PI-R - Psychometric properties: Convergent Validity

A

Self-spouse agreement (2 forms of NEO-PR: Self and Other rated)
N,E,O,A,C → .60, .73, .65, .62, .63: Moderate to large convergent validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

NEO-PI-R - Psychometric properties: Discriminant Validity

A

Can be found when test correlated with tests with constructs unrelated.
-> Sometimes scales are not independent (C & A)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lastest version of the test? Date & characteristics

A

NEO-PI-3. Published in 2005.
- 240 items, description of behaviors rated on 5-point scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree)
- Age range: 14-99 (norms for adolescents)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In NEO-PI, raw scores converted to ______

A

T-scores (M=50, SD=10)

17
Q

Application of NEO-PI (2)

A

(1) Mostly research on basic personality
(2) Limited usefulness in clinical or other applied settings

18
Q

NEO-PI issues (2)

A

(1) Aquiescence: Tentency to agree with statements
-> Half reverse keyed items
(2) Social desirability: Tendency to portray self in a socially desirable way - Construct validity problem

19
Q

What’s NEO-PI’s recommendation to combat acquiescence bias?

A

If more than 150 items are ‘agree or strongly agee’ profile must be interpreted with caution.

20
Q

NEO-PI-R Interpretation

A

Test of NORMAL personality, not psychopathology. BUT Research on how combination of scores → psychopathology
- E.g. Paranoid can be identified by very HIGH neuroticism, LOW extraversion, LOW openness, LOW agreeableness

21
Q

MMPI: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory def

A

Self-report measure to aid in the diagnosis of psychiatric disorders.
=> The most used and thoroughly researched personality test since 1960s
=> Consistent with then common psychiatric perspectives on abnormal personality characteristics

22
Q

MMPI first published in ____. Current version = ___

A

Early 1940s; MMPI-3 (2020)

23
Q

MMPI: How were the Original Clinical scales made? characteristics & approach (3)

A
  • Empirical approach.
  • Final item pool = 550 sample items
  • Response scale: True or False or Cannot say
  • Primary normative sample = 724 Minnesota “normals”
24
Q

General steps in Development of most clinical scales

A

Empirical approach
Choose 2 groups.
- Administer item pool to large group: psychiatric & normative
- Select a diagnostic group
- Compare endorsement for each item of selected group to normative group

25
Q

MMPI: “Neurotic” Triad

A
  • Scale 1: Hypochondriasis (Numerous physical symptoms)
  • Scale 2: Depression (Sadness, loss of energy, severe depression)
  • Scale 3: Hysteria (Physical symptoms in response to stress)
26
Q

MMPI: “Psychotic” Tetrad

A
  • Scale 6: Paranoia (Resentful and suspicious of others, delusions of persecution)
  • Scale 7: Psychasthenia (Rumination, Obsessive-Compulsive)
  • Scale 8: Schizophrenia (Withdrawn, reclusive, bizarre thinking)
  • Scale 9: Hypomania (Impulsive, distractible, emotional excitement)
27
Q

Scales: MMPI

A

Scale 0: Social introversion
Scale 1: Hypochondriasis
Scale 2: Depression
Scale 3: Hysteria
Scale 4: Psychopathic Deviate
Scale 5: Masculinity-Femininity
Scale 6: Paranoia
Scale 7: Psychasthenia
Scale 8: Schizophrenia
Scale 9: Hypomania

28
Q

Validity scales in MMPI (6)

A

(1) L(Lie) Scale: Endorse too few items which express common frailties
(2) F Scale (Infrequency scale): Endorse items which few people endorse
(3) K Scale (Defensiveness Scale): Faking good
(4) FB (Frequent back): infrequent responding in 2nd half of the test
(5) VRIN: Assesses random responding
(6) TRIN: Acquiescence bias

29
Q

Interpretation MMPI scores before vs after

A
  • Before: 70+ = may have clinical significance; Today: 65
  • Before: look at any elevation in any of the scale (1 most elevated scale); now: Interpret scores in multiple subscales
30
Q

MMPI-2 (4)

A

(1) Re-standardization: More appropriate normative sample
(2) Updated item content (567 items)
(3) Same clinical scales but 5 and 0 not psychopathology
(4) 3 new validity scales (FB, VRIN, TRIN)

31
Q

MMPI New validity scale: FB

A

Frequent Back:
(before = infrequent responding in 1st half of the test);
- this = infrequent responding in 2nd half of the test

32
Q

MMPI New validity scale: VRIN

A

Assesses random responding
For each scale, you have 2 items with similar content (should be similar) => if they don’t answer in similar way, random responding

33
Q

MMPI New validity scale: TRIN

A

Measure of acquiescence: Pairs of items with opposite content => should have different responses
If agree to both = acquiescence

34
Q

MMPI also have ________ (~60) based on _______

A

content scales; - measuring particular constructs; Rational test construction (Based on judgment of what items seem to be measuring)
=> E.g. anxiety, alcoholism scale, Obsessiveness, Family problems, Negative treatment indicators

35
Q

Strength MMPI-2

A

Large, more diverse normative sample

36
Q

Weaknesses MMPI-2 (2)

A

(1) Criterion groups now dated
(2) Considerable item overlap reduces discriminant validity