Social Approach Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Ecological validity in Milgrams study

A
High
-sample 45v shock
-pps believe real (supported by qual data, nervous laugh etc) 
Low
-lacks mundane realism
-not everyday task
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What qualitative data was collected in Milgrams study?

A

Observation of pps reaction

  • nervous laugh
  • sweat
  • trembling
  • stuttering
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What quantitative data was collected in Milgrams study?

A

How many dropped out at each stage

  • 65% went to 450
  • 100% went to 300v
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What practical applications can we made from Milgrams findings

A
  • educate on the danger of obedience

- use to teach people to follow morals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the aim of Milgrams study?

A

“Germans are diff hypoth”

-Americans will respond to an authority figure to harm others in a similar way to the germans in WW2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What method was used in Milgrams study

A

Controlled observation

Snapshot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe milgrams sample

A

20-50 year old males
Any occupation
Volunteer sample advertised in newspaper
(Students not allowed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the IV in Milgrams study?

A

NONE as structured observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the DV in Milgrams study and how was it measured?

A

Level of obedience

  • num of pps to drop out at each stage
  • level of shock given
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What controls were made in Milgams study?

A

Standardised procedure
4 standard prompts
1 standard response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the standard response in Milgrams study given by the experimenter?

A

Although the shocks are painful they cause no permanent tissue damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the 4 standard prompts used by the experimenter in Milgrams study?

A

1) please continue
2) the exp requires that you continue
3) it’s absolutely essential that you cont
4) you have no other choice your must go in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What changes could be made to Milgrams study?

A
1) Improve ethics 
\+inform pps of true aim
\+relieve stress, no long term damage 
-demand characteristics 
-social desirability 

2)include women
+more representative/generalisable
-lower validly, doesn’t fit aim “germans are diff” as german soldiers=men not women

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What reaction did the learner show in Milgrams study when a 300v shock was given?

A

Banging on the wall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What reaction did the learner show in Milgrams study when a 345v shock was given?

A

No response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What ethical issues occurred in Milgrams study?

A

Deception
-pps believed tests of memory
-unaware they gave fake shock
-believed allocation of teacher/learner was random but rigged lottery
Protection
-pps may have felt guilt for giving shocks

17
Q

What was the aim of reicher and haslams study?

A

Study the way people respond to a system of inequality (tyranny) Do they accept or resist

18
Q

R&H was a

A

Experimental case study with 3 IV’s

19
Q

The IV’s in R&H were..

A

1) permeability
2) legitimacy
3) cognitive alternatives

20
Q

The DV in R&H was

A
social organisational & clinical variables 
Measured using triangular data 
•daily swabs
•video recording
•psychometric test
21
Q

What controls were made in R&H

A

Standardised
•clothing
•environment
•inter-rater reliability

22
Q

Practical applications of R&H

A
Power of groups
Tyranny not inevitable 
Consequence of group dynamics 
Aired on TV
Surveillance may reduce reduce abuse of power
23
Q

Ecological validity in R&H

A

Lacks as prisoners aware roles not real
Aired on tv- social desire ability

High
pps sufficiently involved
Pps Showed true emotion

24
Q

Ethics in R&H

A

3 day screening with consent forms
2 inde clinical psychologists
5 inde ethics committee monitored
Ended on day 8 after concerns

25
Q

Quan and qual data in R&H

A

Psycho test& cortisol levels =quan

Video recordings =qual

26
Q

R&H was a

A

Longitudinal CS

27
Q

Additional eval of R&H

A

+generalisable (sample reflect target p)
+high validity(quan/qual/unable to fake cortisol)
-lack eco validty
-low reliability (cs so unable to repeat due to uncontrolled variables)

28
Q

Changes to R&H

A

1) include females

2) not air it on tv

29
Q

R&H sample

A
Volunteer
•332 men applied
•15 men picked after 3 phase screening
•5 groups of 3 
•matched on personality 
•1 guard:2prisoners
30
Q

Describe 3 phase screening

A

Psychometric test measuring social&clinical variables e.g dominance anxiety
Weekend assessment by inde psycho
Medical and police checks