SOC388 - 7. Becker/Garfinkel Flashcards
Becker
pragmatism
Labeling Theory
used to think there’s an inherent disposition toward deviance
once we attach label, we treat them as a deviant and will act deviant
Meaning
learn to associate effects of smoking with pleasure of smoking
first we have to learn how to properly smoke it
learn to recognize the effects and connect it to drug use
Meaning
nothing inherent in why people become marijuana user
meaning is created through our conversation of gestures in interaction
symbolic interactionism: people have to point to meaning
Experience
learn that playing sports is a pleasurable experience regardless of outcome
Experience
there’s physical reactions which lead to positive sensations
associate physical reactions with pleasurable experience
Experience
there’s two ways of learning meanings: told by others and by observation
shopping: associate positive feeling with buying something new
Experience
we have to identify them as positive, point to them for ourselves
Interaction
how we learn meanings of things and experiences
Garfinkel
-
Ethnomethodology
“study of set of common sense knowledge and range of procedures and considerations whereby people makes sense of find their way about in and act in situations they are part of”
Ethnomethodology
1967 - new way of studying
reflexively – we don’t think about it – reflex
Ethnomethodology
members shape action in relation to context while the context itself is constantly being redefined through action
social order ongoing (constantly maintaining) practical (actions) accomplishment (something we accomplish)
Ethnomethodology
criticism of traditional mainstream sociology – didn’t take everyday life seriously
we have to study everyday life as opposed to seeing social order as context to explain something else
Ethnomethodology
traditional sociologists took everyday life for granted
Blumer and Garfinkel says we need to explain social order and everyday life
Ethnomethodology
We had to study people
Tries to explain common sense
Argued against micro and macro – distinction wrong and misleading
Ethnomethodology
Can’t easily distinguish between macro and micro
Even macro structures are still that things we accomplish through ongoing practices
Ethnomethodology
Blumer: distinction betw external and internal factors is misleading, both are maintained
Macro structures are not prior to our experience, they wouldn’t exist if we didn’t take actions to maintain them
Micro structures are the same way