Situation Variables Affecting Obedience Content Flashcards

1
Q

What is obedience?

A

A type of social influence where somebody acts in response to a direct order from a figure with perceived authority. The person receiving the order is often made to respond in a way they wouldn’t usually if they weren’t given this order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How did Milgram recruit participants for his study?

A

Through newspaper ads and flyers in the post:
. Offered $4.50 to take part and would have their travel costs paid for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did the ad deceptively call Milgram’s study?

A

A study about memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many people were recruited for Milgram’s study and what can be said about this?

A

40 male only participants, aged between 20 and 50 years, with jobs ranging from unskilled to professional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How was Milgram’s study rigged from the start?

A

The draw for their role always selected ‘Mr Wallace’ as the ‘learner’ (person being shocked). He was a confederate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What role were the true participants assigned to in Milgram’s study?

A

The ‘teacher’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who was the ‘experimenter’ in Milgram’s study?

A

An actor in a white lab coat (another confederate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How were participants in Milgram’s study given the right to withdraw?

A

They were told they could leave the study at any time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the procedure in Milgram’s baseline study?

A

. Learner strapped into chair in another room and wired with electrodes
. The learner had to performance tasks involving learning word pairs
. The experimenter required the teacher to give an increasingly severe shock on every wrong answer
. The shocks were demonstrated to the teacher to prove it ‘safe’ and were not real from that point onwards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the range of shock levels in Milgram’s baseline study?

A

15 to 450 volts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How did the learners react to different shock levels (same every time)?

A

300V - learner pounded on wall, saying ‘get me out of here’ and didn’t respond to any further shocks, as if he was dead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the experimenters standardised instructions when the teacher looked to him for guidance?

A

‘An absence of response should be treated as a wrong answer’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the four standard ‘prods’ repeated if necessary in Milgram’s baseline study?

A
  1. ‘Please continue’
  2. ‘The experiment requires that you continue’
  3. ‘It is absolutely essential that you continue’
  4. ‘You have no other choice, you must go on.’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the findings on obedience levels in Milgram’s baseline study?

A

. No participants stoped below 300V
. 12.5% stopped at 300V
. 65% continued to the highest 450V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What data apart from obedience levels were collected from Milgram’s baseline study?

A

Qualitative data on observations on how the participants showed extreme signs of tension:
. Sweating
. Biting lips
. Nervous laughter
. Stuttering

Three participants had ‘full-blown uncontrollable seizures’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do we know the findings of Milgram’s baseline study weren’t expected?

A

Before the experiment, Milgram asked 14 psychology students to predict the behaviour of the participants
- the students estimated no more than 3% would go to the full 450V

17
Q

What were the results of the follow-up questionnaire to Milgram’s baseline study?

A

84% said they felt glad to have participated

18
Q

How was Milgram’s study quite ethical after it finished?

A

The participants were debriefed, ensuring their behaviour was back to normal

19
Q

Why did Milgram decide to do his study on obedience?

A

He wanted to know why the German population followed the orders of Hitler in the holocaust
- were Germans different?
- were some Germans naturally more obedient than others?

20
Q

What is a situational variable?

A

The environment that appears to affect the results/behaviour in a study

21
Q

What was the baseline obedience figure from original Milgram study?

A

65%

22
Q

What was the first proximity variation of Milgram’s study and results?

A

Teacher and learner in same room
- obedience rate drops to 40% as the teacher could see the reactions aren’t genuine, so can take responsibility to not continue

23
Q

What was the second proximity variation in Milgram’s variations and what were the results?

A

. Teacher forced learner’s hand onto an ‘electroshock plate’ when they refused to answer a question
- obedience rate dropped to 30%

24
Q

What was the final proximity variation (most important) of Milgram’s variations and what were the results?

A

. Experimenter leaves room and instructions given over a phone call, so the proximity between the experimenter and teacher is further
- obedience rate drops to 21%
- teachers tended to give lower voltage shocks and pretended to give shocks

25
Q

What conclusion can be drawn from the proximity variations of Milgram’s study?

A

For obedience to occur, the person giving the orders has to be physically present to for the highest obedience levels e.g an example of this is when you are set cover work, you may not actually do it as the teacher isn’t present

26
Q

What was the location variation in Milgram’s variations and results?

A

. Location changed to a run-down abandoned building in Connecticut
- equipment set up in the basement of the building

Finding: obedience drops to 48%
- however, this isn’t a massive drop, showing the location of the study isn’t actually an extremely important factor in obedience levels

27
Q

What was the uniform variation in Milgram’s variation and what were the results?

A

Experimenter called for a phone call and an ‘ordinary member of the public’ comes in as a new experimenter (also a confederate)
- wears casual clothes
- obedience drops to 20% (lowest rate)

28
Q

What was the aim of Bickman (1974)?

A

Investigate whether obedience was affected by the uniform worn

29
Q

What kind of experiment was Bickman’s study and how many participants?

A

153 random participants in New York (field experiment)

30
Q

What 3 ways were the experimenters dressed in Bickman’s study?

A

. Security guard
. Milkman
. Ordinary clothes

31
Q

What did the experimenters ask the public in Bickman’s study?

A

One of these instructions:
. ‘Pick up this bag for me’
. ‘The sign says no standing.’

32
Q

What were the results of Bickman’s study and what conclusion can be drawn?

A

. Security guard: 76% obedience
. Ordinary clothes: 30% obedience
. Milkman: 47% obedience

Conclusion: in real life, obedience occurs in response to a uniform that reflects a legitimate authority